Bangkok Post » Post Blogs
Friday, May 25, 2012
Foreign land grab threat not just an illusion
Remember the news three years ago about some
Saudi sheikhs trying to buy up paddy fields in central Thailand to
ensure a steady rice supply for their oil-rich but food-scarce
countries?
Back then, the authorities could not deliver any evidence of the
buy-ups, and blamed foreign men with Thai wives for purchasing local
land through proxy ownership. That's why I thought the brouhaha was
simply a case of xenophobia.
Now, I am not so sure.
Thanks to research by farmers rights group GRAIN on worldwide
farmland grabs, I couldn't help wondering if the scapegoating was a ploy
to shift public attention from the real culprits.
GRAIN, an international non-profit group that supports small farmers'
rights, has documented an alarming trend of governments and
corporations buying up farmland on a large scale in more than 60
developing countries to produce basic foods for export.
Renee Vellve, GRAIN co-founder and researcher, said the massive rush was triggered by the food crisis in 2007 and 2008.
To protect themselves, the food-importing countries led by the Gulf
States started to use "farming abroad" to secure direct food supplies.
Meanwhile, the financial crisis in 2007 and 2008 also encouraged the
finance industry to regard farmland as a new source of healthy returns.
According to the World Bank, about 50 million hectares of land were
sold or under long-term lease to foreign governments and investors in
2008 and 2009 alone. It's a conservative estimate. According to Land
Matrix, an online public database of large-scale land deals, 227 million
hectares were involved in this global farmland grab.
That is more than 1,400 million rai of farmland, or half the land area of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
As a result of this global land grabbing, millions of poor farmers
are being thrown off their land, local water sources are siphoned to
feed giant agro-industries, and ecosystems are severely damaged by
large-scale chemical-intensive plantations.
In short, poor people are being robbed of their livelihoods to make food security in rich countries possible.
GRAIN was last year awarded the Right Livelihood Award, an
alternative Nobel Prize, for exposing this ruthless global land grabbing
which is driven by rich governments and multinational corporations and
financed by powerful pension funds and multilateral agencies.
Farmland earns high returns, with fertile land becoming scarcer as food prices rise worldwide.
According to Black Sea Agriculture, an investing firm, farmland
earned the highest returns of 635% in 2010, two times more than gold and
stocks, and about six times more than real estate.
The acquisition of massive amounts of farmland in foreign countries
comes in many guises, from direct purchases, state concessions, to
long-term leases.
The business structures also vary, such as direct management, joint ventures, contract farming, and farming companies.
Land is also being sought for biofuels, timber plantations, carbon credits, mining, and tourism.
Among the main countries seeking farmland abroad are the Gulf States,
China, South Korea and Japan. Closer to home are Singapore and
Malaysia, GRAIN says.
More than half of the deals happen in Africa. But the threats are also palpable in Southeast Asia.
For example, Kuwait is reportedly investing US$20 million to irrigate
4,500 hectares in Laos to produce rice for export to Kuwait.
GRAIN has not documented land grabbing in Thailand, but a similar pattern is taking place here.
While the buying up of paddy fields has yet to be exposed, many
scenic areas in resort towns are now in the hands of foreign real estate
businesses.
For years, mountains in the North have been turned into
chemical-intensive orange plantations by Chinese money and corn
plantations by contract farm giants.
Meanwhile, forest dwellers are kicked off their ancestral land for
forest officials' carbon credit money. Old communities are also evicted
from the forests to make way for timber and oil palm plantations.
Concerns about massive land grabbing have nothing to do with xenophobia.
They stem from a desire to hold the government accountable when the
drive to make Thailand the so-called Kitchen of the World ends up
destroying local ecological systems, small farmers' livelihoods, and our
very own food security.
There are three countries - South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey - in which Thai are not allowed to purchase land or or a house because those countries have a "reciprical" law that states - "If our citizens can't buy in your country, then you can't buy in ours". Maybe if more countries, especially the United States, passed laws such at that, then we would see a change in the laws and attitude of the Thai.
For me, there is no difference, the vast majority of money hungry investors have only a short-term view and reap quickly whatever they can reap from the land, what is next they do not care, may they be from anywhere of this worlk, including from Thailand!
State owned PTT grabs coal mine at Indonesia and Mogolia through public listed company Sakari Singapore at a cost of S$1,200,000,000. Prior today, PTT had 45.5% control of Sakari Singapore.
Who grabs more land?
http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_884451046EA0EA6748257A6700332653/$file/MGOannouncement.27aug2012.pdf?openelement
I love the place dearly, but sometimes it makes me crazy - and then I smile!!
Amazing Thailand (from one of the few farangs who do not try to run it down every chance they get!)
I love the place dearly, but sometimes it makes me crazy - and then I smile!!
Amazing Thailand (from one of the few farangs who do not try to run it down every chance they get!)
This post has 6 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
Leave a comment
Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!
Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comments. You can sign in to the community by clicking here.
If you weren't part of the community yet, please sign up here.
By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.



When Thai land has become ruined by their urea and NPK, those countries will move on to other countries or areas of land, and leave Thailand in a serious mess from which only the Thai politicians and their cronies will benefit.
Perhaps it is this that will bring about the inevitable, nationwide, public backlash against corrupt politicians.