Abhisit says public fed up with protests

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Breakingnews » Breakingnews

Abhisit says public fed up with protests

  • Published: 31/01/2009 at 09:03 PM
  • Online news: Breakingnews

Davos - Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva told the World Economic Forum on Saturday he believes the mood of the people is turning against opposition protesters but that he could order a second economic stimulus package.

Speaking as thousands gathered in Bangkok calling for the dissolution of parliament, Abhisit, who has only been in office for one month, told reporters at the World Economic Forum in Davos that he was not worried.

"The deputy prime minister is making sure that there is no repeat of what happened last year,” he said, referring to mass protests that rocked the country in 2008 and stranded hundreds of thousands of tourists.

"I think the mood of the people now is that they very much want to move forward, they want to get over the current divisions, they want to see a government that works hard, that deals with people's concerns and has the honesty and integrity that has been missing for so long,” he said.

"If we can keep on working in the way we have for the last month then I'm not worried about it.”

He said the government has a future "if we can deliver on what we promised, bringing stability back, running the economy well, no corruption scandals.”

He said the demonstrations would be "a way of checking the strength of the Red Shirts movement” which supports former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Abhisit said the world economic crisis was a "bigger risk” for his government and that he could order new stimulus measures on top of a 116-billion-baht (3.3-billion-dollar/2.5-billion-euro) package approved by parliament this week.

He said the finance ministry was in negotiations with international financial institutions for a possible cash injection, mainly with regional development banks. "There could be a second financing package if necessary.”

Abhisit said the Thai economy was now technically in recession but he hoped it would return to positive growth in the final quarter of 2009.

The premier said that he felt stronger as he had gained more support in parliament since taking office. By-elections have given his Democratic Party and its allies a majority of about 50, he said.

But he said that the Thaksin camp still had influence. Thaksin, a business tycoon, was forced out of power in a military coup in 2006 and has since lived in exile.

"I think the ball is in our court, it is up to us to deliver, up to us to show the people. The Thai people are really really tired of conflicts and divisions,” Abhisit said.

"You can never underestimate somebody with that amount of money, but the fact of the matter is that the majority of the Thai people want the country to move on. Why should we be held up by one man?”

Abhisit said Thaksin followers had been lobbying embassies of Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries in Bangkok urging the countries not to attend the Asean summit scheduled for Hua Hin at the end of the month.

About the author

Writer: AFP

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Anonymous

    Discussion 77 : 01/02/2009 at 11:27 PM77

    Mr. Boon, how rude of you to accuse someone of being dictator.

    Need I remind you, political in Thailand is nowhere near dictatorship. If you want to understand the meaning of dictatorship more, please go to Zimbabwe or somewhere along that line.

  • Boon

    Discussion 76 : 01/02/2009 at 11:16 PM76

    The puppet PM is just a tool of the dictators. His fate as leader of democrat is being monitor by his DPM, who is the dictators' agent. I advice Khun A to wake up now and form his own political party together with the many able people.

    However, it is not possible for him to do that because the dictators will screw him like they are doing to Thaksin. Khun A is now trapped and he will break down soon. May be he should choose to live in England and never to return.

  • wtf

    Discussion 75 : 01/02/2009 at 10:27 PM75

    Lol. Voice of Reason, you really sound like Thaksin - "what about all those people that voted for PPP" YEAH - buying those votes wasn't cheap!!! Well the money wasn't there this time around and they voted the other way. Welcome to Thailand.

    lol. Well I don't blame a businessman for not wanting to get his money back on his investment - but a good businessman also knows when to quit while he's ahead.

    Imagine if all the money being wasted to pay these radio stations, run Truth Today, or bus in handfuls of people for 30 minute showcases of human exploitation was actually spent on something worthwhile for the country - like improving education?

    Party on Voice - I hope you get paid well for emasculating yourself in public like this.

  • Anonymous

    Discussion 74 : 01/02/2009 at 10:27 PM74

    Mr. voice of reason, in discussion 61 you said that a government must be elected by the people in a general election.

    Good point, but did not PM Somchai elected the same way as PM Abhisit?

    I sense some preferential treatment here.

  • wtf

    Discussion 73 : 01/02/2009 at 10:18 PM73

    Malv #69: That's a well thought out, elementary explanation - accurate and to the point - but don't waste your time on Drey/Voice of Reason/Kaweeka they are all the same guy - and he is a paid shill.

    If not - I can't believe they would be all in lock step with their total Jakrapob-esque ignorance of a Parliamentary system - where Abhisit was indeed legally chosen by the representatives the people voted into office - including many of Thaksin's former supporters.

    People, got something against his policy fine - but the guy is in office fair and square. Don't get upset just because Thaksin's racket fell to pieces and got swept away in the last election.

    The UDD represents the Peua Thai faction who is now playing "sore loser". When the Democrats start pushing destructive policy, all the UDD is going to ensure is enough draconian laws put on the books to stop real dissent when it is called for.

  • Thaksin fuck off

    Discussion 72 : 01/02/2009 at 09:28 PM72

    Thaksin paid the red shirts and brainwashed them.

  • joke of a country

    Discussion 71 : 01/02/2009 at 09:27 PM71

    the answer is simple. The PPP was legitimate because the population voted without understanding what democracy means. They voted for handouts and money. The PPP was legitimate because its mandate was to free a fugitive ex PM.

    Yes, you could argue that he was tried and convicted by his enemies, but when PM, who would have sentenced him - his brother? His brother in-law? Every key position was filled with a crony.

    Bottom line is never give democracy to people who don't deserve it.

    Thailand, if you want democracy, fight for it. Stop watching your evening soap operas hoping that everything will fix itself.

  • somsak

    Discussion 70 : 01/02/2009 at 08:52 PM70

    Did the red shirt people insisted that PTP should disolve the parliament, yeah, maybe some leaders said it's better to go for election as a stratetic advice, but did they took to the stree requesting the hosue disolution for PTP? No As long as PDP are in power, they don't care, even if milions of votes are dumped in the garbage cuns according to your interpretaton, then, how can you say that they are democratic fighters for general election? They are just protesitng for their obsses to regain power, don't overestimate them

  • malv

    Discussion 69 : 01/02/2009 at 08:19 PM69

    Voice of reason,

    Thank you for your timely response. Now it's my turn to express my personal opinion, with which I'm sure you will disagree. In this case, I'd say that the house can continue to function for years. It's probably a big ask for moderate Thai citizens who are neither red nor yellow to go back to the poll booth again.

    My point is that when people elected representatives, these representatives are entrusted to make democratic decisions in the parliament. It's PPP who failed the people who elected them as their reincarnation, PTP, failed to attract enough representatives to form a government. Of course, you will argue that the military acted as a catalyst in the process. But the bottom line is that PPP actually broke the law and the party dissolution was a consequence of their own action.

    This is probably my last one today. It's perhaps time to agree to disagree.

  • voice of reason

    Discussion 68 : 01/02/2009 at 07:43 PM68

    Malv

    I understand where you are coming from, but how long do you leave it between general election and formation of the government? There was a legitimately elected government in place. The EC, Military and many other transpired to depose the legally elected government and replace it with this government. That general election in 2007 was won by the PPP. What about the votes of all the people that voted PPP? This is what you seem to be casually shrugging your shoulders over. Meh, who cares?

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top