Court: Article 112 is constitutional

Published: 10 Oct 2012 at 15.56
Online news:

The Constitution Court on Wednesday ruled that Article 112 of the Criminal Code, the lese majeste law, is constitutional.

The ruling was made following a request by Somyos Prueksakasemsuk and Ekachai Hongkangwan, defendants in lese majeste cases.

The request, submitted through the Criminal Court, asked the Constitution Court to rule whether Article 112 of the Criminal Code contradicts Sections 3, 8, 29 and 45 of the constitution.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

howell
Post : 1,661
Send message

Discussion 12 : 11 Oct 2012 at 23.1312
Post this to my Facebook
@hillfarang. I thought he was in Dubai because he is on the run from the law ?
Like dislike 1 people liked / 2 people disliked this comment
hillfarang
Post : 1,312
Send message

Discussion 11 : 11 Oct 2012 at 10.3911
Post this to my Facebook
D@4 "Bec. the real PM has his office in Dubai.
In what other country would that be constitutional?"

"... in Dubai because of the illegal, unconstitutional military coup!!?!!"
Like dislike 9 people liked / 6 people disliked this comment
siamitude
Post : 796
Send message

Discussion 10 : 11 Oct 2012 at 09.5810
Post this to my Facebook
@mitrapaap Disc. 9 You are right, people need to be responsible and accountable for what they say and what they do. Rights also come with duties. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom to slander. But at the end of the day, Thai ruling class needs to trust the people instead of fearing them. Suppressing free speech is a sign of social weakness and immaturity.
Like dislike 8 people liked / 1 people disliked this comment
mitrapaap
Post : 912
Send message

Discussion 9 : 11 Oct 2012 at 08.119
Post this to my Facebook
Siamitude D7: did you forget to include something? - responsibility.
Like dislike 6 people liked / 9 people disliked this comment
mitrapaap
Post : 912
Send message

Discussion 8 : 11 Oct 2012 at 07.238
Post this to my Facebook
"The Constitution Court unanimously ruled that Article 112 is designed to ... maintain ... morality.

Not very successfully if I look at today's politicians.
Like dislike 15 people liked / 5 people disliked this comment
siamitude
Post : 796
Send message

Discussion 7 : 11 Oct 2012 at 07.147
Post this to my Facebook
Freedom of speech, religion and thought for every Thai is long overdue.
Like dislike 19 people liked / 4 people disliked this comment
musashi
Post : 457
Send message

Discussion 6 : 11 Oct 2012 at 05.496
Post this to my Facebook
The ruling simply shows that the CC knows which side their bread is buttered. That is besides the point. The key point is that Article 112 does not define what constitutes "defamation" or "insult".

Since the criminal code itself has not been clearly defined on purpose, can the CC therefore give us some insight into how judges arrived at the judgments and periods of sentencing? Can they also please clarify the reasons as to why Article 112 is deliberately kept vague and not properly defined.

Case in point, the death of Ah Gong in jail for supposedly sending insulting messages to the PA of the draft dodger can be technically disputed. A rogue politician who wants to pretend to be loyal to the institution could easily have someone's phone setup to be charge under 112 later. Piece of cake.
Like dislike 18 people liked / 3 people disliked this comment
dozouf
Post : 8
Send message

Discussion 5 : 11 Oct 2012 at 02.125
Post this to my Facebook
A just government should neither fear criticism nor stifle free discourse.
Like dislike 18 people liked / 5 people disliked this comment
democrazy
Post : 519
Send message

Discussion 4 : 10 Oct 2012 at 19.114
Post this to my Facebook
Did anyone expect another ruling ?
I am still waiting for a court ruling on the current gov. legality.
Bec. the real PM has his office in Dubai.
In what other country would that be constitutional ?
Like dislike 28 people liked / 18 people disliked this comment
whatajoke
Post : 1,779
Send message

Discussion 3 : 10 Oct 2012 at 17.333
Post this to my Facebook
It may be a contradiction but it's an important law as far as they are concerned so there should be no problem.
Like dislike 4 people liked / 32 people disliked this comment

1 2 Next Last

Court: Article 112 is constitutional | Bangkok Post: breakingnews

Court: Article 112 is constitutional

Most Viewed

'Biggest blackout ever' hits South

Your comments

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!