Minister puts brakes on 3G

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Business » Economics

Minister puts brakes on 3G

Foreigners favoured, TOT and CAT suffer

  • Published: 5/10/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: Business

The long-delayed auction of third-generation (3G) mobile broadband licences scheduled for mid-December could be put on hold indefinitely if Ranongruk Suwunchwee has her way.

The Information and Communications Technology (ICT) minister wants the auction put off as long as possible, reasoning that the conditions deter state telecom enterprises and favour foreign players.

"These conditions discourage TOT and CAT Telecom but pave the way for foreign players to freely bid and grab our national resources," Mrs Ranongruk said after meeting executives of both state telecoms over the weekend.

She said the 3G draft terms from the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) state that a qualified bidder must be a Thai entity or have foreign partners holding not more than 49% under the Telecom Business Law. Bidders must possess spectrum in the range from 1.9 to 2.1 Gigahertz.

The minister said that the TOT subsidiary Thai Mobile owned the 1.9 GHz spectrum and planned to launch the first phase of its 3G services in December with 500 base stations. TOT is also planning to invest 20 billion baht for a nationwide network.

CAT Telecom, she said, was disqualified under the current 3G auction rules because it has the Finance Ministry as a major shareholder, the same as TOT.

Mrs Ranongruk said she would outline her views today to the NTC, which plans an event to celebrate its fifth anniversary, at which Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is to be a guest speaker.

She warned both TOT and CAT Telecom could go bankrupt if 3G licences are awarded under the current conditions.

Telecom analysts say private operators could form new entities to bid for 3G licences, and then shift their existing customers to the new 3G services. This would allow them to reduce the revenue-sharing payments that are the financial lifeblood of the concession owners, TOT and CAT.

TOT chairman Teerawut Boonyasophon said that since TOT and CAT contributed large sums of their concession revenue to government coffers, the NTC should not think only of the money it could make from foreign bidders alone.

But NTC chairman Gen Choochart Promprasit insisted the regulator could not put off the auction because it was its duty under the Telecom Business Law.

He also said that the Council of State had offered a legal interpretation that the NTC could allocate frequency since the National Broadcasting Commission, which is supposed to have that duty, has never been formed.

However, if the cabinet asked the NTC to put off the auction, its board would have to consider the matter seriously, he acknowledged.

Advanced Info Service chief executive Wichien Mektrakarn said that what Mrs Ranongruk was doing was inappropriate and was interfering with the industry's growth.

He said TOT had 3G spectrum long before any other operator but had failed to add value to the resource, and that CAT Telecom also had a CDMA service that could be developed into 3G. "It would be very ugly if the ICT minister does as she plans," he said.

"As private operators, we might have to team up against it."

True Corp, however, also opposes the current 3G auction terms because it says they favour its two rivals, AIS and DTAC, which have foreign partners while True is Thai-owned.

About the author

columnist
Writer: Komsan Tortermvasana
Position: Business Reporter

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Honest

    Discussion 15 : 07/10/2009 at 12:11 PM15

    What utter nonsence! Absolutely illogical thinking and reasoning at work here ... and from a minister and her ministry!

    Is the government running a country or a slapstick comedy show? What an embarrassment.

  • RAY

    Discussion 14 : 07/10/2009 at 10:29 AM14

    The not so (in)famous thai manipulative, unclear politics at play..........


    DISGUST

  • angry reader

    Discussion 13 : 06/10/2009 at 06:31 PM13

    Well well... another idiotic Minister trying to get on the already worn-out hobby-horse telling everybody how bad the Foreigners are.
    The fact is most of the inventions used in modern day life come from outside Thailand.
    I find it quite insulting that those in a position of authority use this rather boring and certainly racist mentality to attack us foreigners for no apparent reason other than to proclaim notoriety. Of course we all know Thais are better educated that us foreigners, NOT! An illusion which has marred Thailand and prevented her from moving forward in the right direction for decades no doubt. The fact is foreigners have a wealth of experience and knowledge which could further develop Thailand as a stronger nation but for reasons that can be only described an unexplicable, are constantly hampered by self-centered and quite obviously uneducated Beurocrats !

  • anazed

    Discussion 12 : 06/10/2009 at 02:04 PM12

    Why is the auction necessary???
    can't they just define a fee and ask anyone wanting to use the frequency pay that fixed license amount with a revenue sharing deal?

    wait.... auction is supposed to bring in much more money which state tecos can't pay...

    what they can do is give a fixed minimum price and revenue sharing to state telcos and have auction for foreign operators.

    in that way everyone will have a fair deal.

  • Tim

    Discussion 11 : 06/10/2009 at 01:23 PM11

    America is already upgrading to 4G

  • Ned

    Discussion 10 : 06/10/2009 at 10:49 AM10

    True is Thai-owned - That is the exact reason for their inability to provide decent programing and service.

    Time to open the door to outside competition in every aspect of the communication industry. While your at it, remove the ICT minister who is more interested in the unproductive, useless attempted blocking of sites she thinks inappropriate instead of using all resources to move the industry into the 21st centuary.

  • Amazing Thailand

    Discussion 9 : 06/10/2009 at 10:29 AM9

    To Vic #4

    "An illuminating tower of incompetence"


    You said it all in a nutshell. This is what we get when a nationalistic nurse is put in charge of affairs she has no idea of.

    Internet connection quality in Thailand is appalling and getting worse. There's zero incentive for TOT to offer better quality service which everyone who uses TOT can confirm.

    What is needed is a competent or several competent alternatives for consumers to choose from as to force TOT to improve their services or go bust.

    An incompetent business does not deserve to be supported by government (public) funds. It is counter-productive to the public and TOT being a Plc, it is the publics money that is being wasted on TOT giving them crap.

    TOT reminds me of an old, Soviet-era dinosaur and as such it needs to either reform itself or go extinct.

    It is definitely not a national asset. Much more a huge national liability.

  • Ian Bromley

    Discussion 8 : 06/10/2009 at 09:09 AM8

    The existing players AIS True & DTAC all continue to market time limited pay as you go cards, which are clearly illegal under current regulations. TOT, CAT & TT&T operate shockingly bad internet systems that a minor African state like Rwanda can do better. So as far as I am concerned none of them should be allowed to enlarge their commercial footprint. Bring in new competence & let the consumer see what it is like to live in a first world environment.

  • james

    Discussion 7 : 05/10/2009 at 10:53 PM7

    maybe she stands to make a lot of bhat. someone should check her holdings.

  • David Harrison

    Discussion 6 : 05/10/2009 at 07:06 PM6

    Can the Thai Government make up it's mind as to whether it supports capitalism or socialist protectionism?

    The State Owned Telecom industry has enjoyed ample time to launch 3G services yet because they lack the competency to do so plead for as long as they need to play catch up. But do they mention the needs of Consumers? In fact those that want the service never seem to get a mention. And since when has the Telecoms Sector been a national asset. It's not the forest that grows or water that flows and certainly not oil!

    The Ministry needs to live in the Real World and become Customer focused. Ownership is not an issue. Service is!

    David Harrison

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top