One of the many things I learned from Milton Friedman is that the true cost of government is its spending, not its taxes. To put it another way, spending is financed either by current taxes or through borrowing, and borrowing amounts to future taxes, which have almost the same impact on economic performance as current taxes.
We can apply this reasoning to the United States' unsustainable fiscal deficit. As is well known, closing this deficit requires less spending or more taxes.
The conventional view is that a reasonable, balanced approach entails some of each. But as Friedman would have argued, the two methods should be considered polar opposites. Less spending means the government will be smaller. More taxes mean the government will be larger. Hence, people who favour smaller government (for example, some Republicans) will want the deficit closed entirely by cutting spending, whereas those who favour larger government (for example, President Barack Obama and most Democrats) will want the deficit closed entirely by raising taxes.
This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.