| about this site | who we are | site map | reading tips | teaching tips | student tips | build vocab |
| teaching vocab | hot links | visit Thai school | Bangkok Post | student weekly | home

This column covers "developing stories" meaning that you can expect additional stories on the same subject in the near future. The material that follows was written using much of the same language as your Bangkok Post writers use in their stories.

February 8, 2005

INTERNATIONAL

A welcome change: Some good news from the Middle East


As Iraqis vote in large numbers,
Israel and Palestinian leaders meet in Egypt

For the first time in many months, almost everyone can agree that there has been some positive news on the political front out of the Middle East. Even the price of oil fell a bit as a result.

The event that captured most of our attention, of course, was the election in Iraq. Millions of Iraqis defied insurgent threats of a bloodbath to exercise their right to vote. In the end, there was violence — more than 50 people died — but it was far less than expected. That is definitely good news.

What the Iraqis were actually voting for was not widely understood, however — even among many Iraqis themselves. This week, all of us will get a better chance to find out. First we should get an official announcement of both the turnout and the results. Indeed, you may even be able to find that information in the front section of the Bangkok Post today.

The turnout is important because: 1) we want to know the percentage of eligible voters actually voted; and 2) more significantly, we want to know how Iraq’s three main population groups voted. Of particular concern is the Sunni population, a distinct minority in numerical terms, but the group that held most of the political power under Saddam Hussein and the privileges that went with it.

It is very likely that the Sunni vote was very low and, as a result, this group will be poorly represented in the new parliament. Analysts fear this could inflame an already volatile situation since most of the support for the insurgency comes from the Sunni areas of the country.

The overall election results are obviously important because they will give us an idea of how easy or how difficult it will be to form a government, and also who might be expected to head that government.

Many observers expect that the new government will be dominated by Shiite politicians, probably those with strong connections to the revered Shiite cleric, the Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. But they may not be very united and, as a result, groups loyal to Interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi could have a strong say as well.

Watch to see what happens and watch especially to see if the new Iraqi leaders make a special effort to give the Sunnis a significant role in government.

Remember also that the new parliament’s main job, apart from selecting a new government, is to write the country’s constitution. Here the question is whether the constitution will be based largely on Shiite religious values — something that could anger the country’s Sunni and Kurdish minorities — or if it will be more secular in character.

Meanwhile, there have been also some positive developments in the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Hopefully, that trend will continue today as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon travels to Egypt to meet the new president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas.

Since coming to power in an election held only weeks after the death of long-time political leader Yassir Arafat, Mr Abbas has worked very hard trying to reduce the level of violence existing between the two neighbours. He has even gone so far as to station Palestinian security forces in border areas to discourage militants from launching attacks on Israel. Mr Abbas has called such attacks counterproductive, gaining nothing while leading to the deaths of over 3,000 Palestinians in the past four years.

Israeli government leaders clearly want to reciprocate and today’s meeting may clarify what actions they will be willing to take. The Israeli cabinet has approved a package of measures, including the gradual withdrawal of Israeli soldiers from five West Bank cities and the release of about 900 Palestinian prisoners.

Mr Abbas is likely to ask for much more, so the meeting may not go as smoothly as most people would like. Watch to see what happens. It is very important that Mr Abbas is seen by his own people as gaining significant concessions from the Israelis. Otherwise the militants may strike out again — a major setback for Mr Abbas, Mr Sharon and the whole peace process. And since the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the main causes of Muslim discontent around the world, it could be bad news for all of us.

Know these words and phrases

front
an area of activity

defied
refused to pay attention to

insurgent
of people fighting against their own government

turnout
the number or percentage of people who have the right to vote and who actually vote

eligible
having the right to do something

privileges
special rights or advantages

inflame
to make a situation worse

volatile
changeable and easily becoming dangerous

dominated
controlled or heavily influenced

revered

respected; highly admired

cleric
a religious leader

interim
intended to last only for a short time until replaced by someone or something more permanent

secular
not connected with religion

station
to put in position

discourage
to prevent or make difficult to do something, especially something bad

militants
people who are willing to use force to gain what they want

counterproductive
having the opposite effect to the one which was intended

reciprocate
to behave or feel towards somebody in the same way as they behave or feel towards you

concessions
things allowed or given up in order to end a disagreement or to make a situation less difficult

discontent
unhappiness


LOCAL

A shrivelling opposition

Its targets exceeded, Thai Rak Thai gains almost unlimited power

Worlds apart from Iraq, voting proceeds peacefully at this Sukhumvit-area polling station in the heart of Bangkok.

People were still voting when I walked past my local polling station a few minutes before closing time. Ten minutes later, I watched on TV as the exit polls were announced indicating a Thai Rak Thai landslide even beyond what analysts were expecting.

Then, about a half hour later, Democrat leader Banyat Bantadtan came out of party headquarters to concede defeat. “I would like to congratulate Thai Rak Thai for achieving its goal of being a single-party government,” he said. All in all, election day in Thailand certainly didn’t provide much suspense.

There is no question that Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s style of governing is hugely popular with Thai voters. As a result, he and his cabinet will have a virtual free rein in running the country for the next four years.

On the positive side, this should mean four years of political stability. It should also mean that Thai Rak Thai will be able to fulfill its campaign promises unhindered by the political opposition. But, as both domestic and foreign critics have been pointing out, there are risks in entrusting so much power to one political group.

The leadership of Thai Rak Thai is broadly more representative of business interests than it is of ordinary Thais and it is conceivable that on certain issues, TRT party interests will not coincide with theirs. Thus, with the opposition so weakened, ordinary Thais could find they have no one to represent them.

Look at the front section of today’s Bangkok Post to see what kind of a political opposition we can expect. Will it only be the Democrats or will the Chart Thai Party join them? There are certain to many other issues under consideration as well as the country digests the implications of TRT’s magnificent victory.

shrivelling
becoming smaller in size

landslide
a victory by a very large margin

concede
to admit that you have lost in a competition

suspense
a feeling of excitement or anxiety

virtual
almost; almost a particular a particular thing or quality

free rein
complete freedom to do things

unhindered
not limited or obstructed

entrusting
giving someone a duty for which they are responsible

coincide
to be the same or similar

digest
to take the time to understand something

implications
the future effects

This lesson was prepared by Acharn Terry Fredrickson, BA Stanford, MA (TESL) University of Minnesota, Manager/Editor of the Learning Post at the Bangkok Post and general editor of this programme.

Read our other What's news columns here.

Back to our home page


|© The Post Publishing Public Co., Ltd.
All rights reserved 2005
|
Last modified: February 7, 2005