| about this site | who we are | site map | reading tips | teaching tips | student tips | build vocab |
| teaching vocab | hot links | visit Thai school | Bangkok Post | student weekly | home

This column covers "developing stories" meaning that you can expect additional stories on the same subject in the near future. The material that follows was written using much of the same language as your Bangkok Post writers use in their stories.

February 22, 2005

LOCAL

Seeing red

As violence escalates in the deep South,
the prime minister introduces a controversial scheme to quell it


Soldiers inspect the scene of the recent car bombing near the Marina Hotel in Sungai Kolok district, Narathiwat. At least four people were killed and 37 others injured. PATTANAPONG HIRUNARD

According to a lengthy post-election story in Time magazine, the victorious Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra is ready to focus his second term on Thailand’s economy.

That may have to wait. He is certainly getting little time for economics during his current stint as the caretaker prime minister. Escalating violence in the South including the country’s first-ever car bomb, has pushed just about everything else to the side.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. After the election rebuke to his Thai Rak Thai Party from the three southernmost provinces, it sounded like the prime minister was going to take a more conciliatory line towards those who opposed him.

But then came the announcement that the army would shortly establish a new infantry division of 12,000 troops to be based permanently in the troubled region. The next day, during a trip to Narathiwat province, Mr Thaksin told residents there that the government was planning on dividing the area into zones and withholding development funds from villages deemed to be supporting the insurgents.

Essentially, the area would be colour-coded similar to the situation during the communist insurgency several decades ago. Instead of red, pink and white areas, however, Mr Thaksin wants to label them red, yellow and green.

Government funds would be withheld from villages where resistance to the government was heaviest. Yellow areas, where the resistance was more moderate, would receive partial funding while villages in green areas would receive the same level of funding as those in the rest of the country.

Mr Thaksin defended his controversial plan in terms that will likely sound reasonable to many people in the country. He asserted that it was necessary to withhold funds from villages supporting the insurgency because they might use them to further their separatist aims.

“What if they used the money to make bombs, buy ammunition and mobile phones [for terror campaigns]? This is intolerable,” Mr Thaksin said.

Nevertheless, criticism for the plan was swift and harsh. Veteran Democrat politician and former prime minister Chuan Leekpai reminded Mr Thaksin that the government does not have the right to punish a part of the country it dislikes. “Doing so is tantamount to saying they are not part of Thailand. It is the government itself that is separating the country.”

In its opinion and analysis section on Friday, the Bangkok Post also went on record as opposing the prime minister’s plan. The lead editorial even attributed much of the blame for the continuing violence to Mr Thaksin himself.

“The seemingly endless spilling of blood in the deep South is preventable and should be stoppable,” it said. “That’s why most people in Thailand are horrified that it is allowed to continue. Thaksin Shinawatra, the caretaker prime minister awaiting installation for his second term, is largely to blame because he has called the shots all along.”

A big part of the problem, the editorial went on is Mr Thaksin’s inflexible businessman’s mindset. “The belief that money is a panacea for all ills has propelled his threat to withhold development funding from locals seen to espouse violence … Although more than 500 people have been killed over the past almost 14 months, Mr Thaksin does not seem to have advanced on his early, simplistic analysis of the region’s problems.”

On the next page, deputy news editor Wasant Techawongtham weighed in with some strong criticism of his own. Far from improving the situation, he said Mr Thaksin’s zoning plan will only make it worse and it will likely strengthen the hand of the insurgents.

“The separatists will be happy with the plan because it will deliver a perfect vehicle for them to carry out their activities. All of a sudden the government is handing them some 300 'red' villages in Narathiwat alone. Villagers in these areas can rightly feel abandoned by their own government."

At the moment, Mr Thaksin’s zoning scheme remains only an idea. Watch to see if the criticism — some of it from members of his own party — leads him to change his mind.

escalate
to become or make greater, worse, more serious, etc.

quell
to stop, especially violence

stint
a period of time spent working in a job

caretaker
in charge for a short time until a new government is chosen

rebuke
rejection

conciliatory
having the intention to calm people’s anger

infantry
foot soldiers

permanently
lasting for a long time; not temporary

deemed
considered

insurgents
people fighting against their own country’s government or armed forces

moderate
not extreme

separatist
wanting to separate a region from the rest of the country

intolerable
completely unacceptable

swift
quick

veteran
someone with a lot of experinece in something

tantamount to
having the same bad effect as something else

attributed
saying that someone is responsible for doing something

horrified
made to feel shocked, disgusted or frightened

called the shots
controlled the situation

inflexible
unwilling or unable to change

panacea
something that will solve all problems

propelled
drove forward

espouse
to give support to a belief, policy, etc.

simplistic
making a problem seem less difficult or complicated than it really is

weighed in
added an opinion

vehicle
something that can be used to achieve something

abandoned
left and no longer wanted


INTERNATIONAL

Explosion in Lebanon

Death of former prime minister revives worries of a civil war

If you are a student or you are still in your 20s, you probably haven’t heard very much about Lebanon. The small middle-eastern country bordering Israel and Syria has been largely peaceful since 1990.

If you are older, however, you might remember that things were horribly different in the two decades preceding 1990. That was a time of a bloody and very complicated civil war during which much of the capital Beirut was reduced to rubble.

Lebanon was a lawless place with dozens of private armies controlling areas of the country. Its neighbours were active as well. In 1982, the country was briefly invaded by Israel seeking to stop Muslim militants from attacking its border areas. But it was Syria that played the biggest role, sending thousands of troops into the country at the request of the Lebanese president to help quell the violence.

The civil war is long over, but the Syrian troops are still there. The international community through the UN has demanded that they leave and many Lebanese agree. Until last week, the most influential opponent of a continued Syrian presence was former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, the man most credited for Lebanon’s remarkable economic recovery since the civil war.

As you probably know, Mr Hariri was killed last week in a massive bomb that shook the capital and killed 16 people. While we still don’t know who planted the bomb, the early blame has fallen largely on Syria, a charge its government vehemently denies. The worry now is that Lebanon will split along anti-Syrian/pro-Syrian lines making a civil war a real possibility.

Analysts say Syria is likely to resist the calls for its withdrawal. Many senior ministers of the Syrian government have business interests in Lebanon and that country is also important in Syrian’s long-running dispute with Israel.

This week the pressure on Syria is likely to mount as President George W. Bush visits Europe. Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon is one of the few areas where both Europeans and the US tend to agree and the leaders will likely have some very strong statements on the matter. Watch to see what happens.

revive
to bring back

horribly
extremely unpleasant

rubble
broken pieces of walls or buildings that have been badly damaged or destroyed

invaded
forcibly entered another country

militants
people will to use force to gain what they want

quell
to stop

charge
accusation

vehemently
strongly and emotionally

resist
to refuse to accept

withdrawal
(of a military force) leaving an area

mount
to increase

This lesson was prepared by Acharn Terry Fredrickson, BA Stanford, MA (TESL) University of Minnesota, Manager/Editor of the Learning Post at the Bangkok Post and general editor of this programme.

Read our other What's news columns here.

Back to our home page


|© The Post Publishing Public Co., Ltd.
All rights reserved 2005
|
Last modified: February 21, 2005