
|
| about this site |
who we are |
site map |
reading tips |
teaching tips |
student tips |
build vocab |
|
INTERNATIONALChinese capitalism on the moveOne of the USA’s major oil companies is a target of a Chinese takeover bid
The offer was more than a billion dollars higher than a previous bid to take over the company by the American energy giant Chevron, a deal that has been accepted by the boards of both companies. For most Americans, it seems almost unthinkable that a company from a communist country could be trying to take over a major capitalist corporation – an American corporation at that. Thus, the bid came as a real eye-opener for Americans, alerting them to China’s rapidly growing status a top-tier world economic power. Having the highest offer doesn’t mean that CNOOC will actually take over Unocal, however. US regulators would likely take a long hard look at such a deal and there is no guarantee that they would approve it in the end. The Bush administration, too, might be uneasy about having a large US energy company that is so important to national security under the control of a potential enemy. Such uncertainty might cause many shareholders to accept Chevron’s lower offer. But don’t count the Chinese completely out either. CNOOC is not your typical Chinese state firm. Its chief executive is a graduate of a US university, it conducts its board meetings in English and the company is being advised by two of Wall Street’s top investment banks, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. This is obviously a very serious bid and it will be interesting to watch what happens. It is made all the more interesting by Unocal’s very large operation in Thailand. Unocal Thailand was the very first oil company to win exploration rights here way back in 1962. It began producing natural gas in 1981 and today it is one of EGAT’s biggest suppliers.
Victory for a hardlinerMahmoud Ahmadinejad is Iran’s new president
He is not very well known outside of Iran, but he has a reputation for advocating a very strict adherence to Islamic rules of behaviour. As such, his election represents a major change from the reformist president he succeeded. At the same time, he is much more in tune with the country’s religious leaders who wield the real power in Iran. Mr Ahmadinejad also seems to be very much in tune with the country’s poor who gave him overwhelming support. Analysts say he was able to exploited widespread resentment over the growing gap between rich and poor, a strategy helped by his own working-class credentials. What Mr Ahmadinejad’s election means for Iran’s relations with other countries is unclear. He has no real international experience, but has hinted that he is not in favour of quickly improving relations with western countries. There is likely to be a lot of analysis of what Mr Ahamadinejad’s rise to power means for Iran and the rest of the world. We can also expect some surprises as we get to know him better.
|