
|
| about this site |
who we are |
site map |
reading tips |
teaching tips |
student tips |
build vocab |
|
This column is for self
study or classroom use and gives guided help with reading the wide variety of writing styles and topics that appear as feature articles in the Bangkok Post. The lessons include background information, skill
building practice and vocabulary explanations.
|
|
This case has generated great public interest from its beginning to the end. One reason, of course, is that those involved were prominent people, but it is also because the case itself was unusual and complicated. The evidence against Dr Wisut was largely circumstantial. No one saw the murder take place and no body was ever found.
There was strong forensic evidence, however. Read to find out what that was. The story also indicates Dr Wisut had a clear motive for killing his wife. What was it? In addition, police also found many other pieces of evidence pointing to Dr Wisut as the murderer. Read to find out what they were. Are you convinced that Dr Wisut was the murderer? The death sentence was imposed because this was a premeditated murder. What evidence detailed in the story indicates that Dr Wisut planned the murder in advance?
Finally, is it now certain that Dr Wisuth will be put to death or is there still another step in the process?
|
judicial involving the courts
upholding
verdict
guilty |
sentence a punishment decided by a court of law
evidence
prominent
circumstantial |
forensic involving the scientific tests used by the police when trying to solve a crime
motive
impose
premeditated |
Wisut's death sentence upheld
POST REPORTERS
However, Dr Wisut has said he will seek a pardon from His Majesty the King. The Supreme Court agreed with the verdict of a lower court, which established that Dr Wisut had a motive to murder his wife. They were reportedly in a bitter marital conflict after Dr Wisut allegedly had an affair with a female patient. Although there was only forensic and circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court believed Dr Wisut murdered his wife. She was last seen leaving a restaurant with Dr Wisut in February 2001. Her body has never been found. His lawyer Apirom Saikhlai said Dr Wisut had the right to petition the King for a pardon within 60 days of the verdict. The petition, to be submitted through Justice Minister Charnchai Likitjitta, will mention Dr Wisut's record of providing medical assistance to inmates during his detention at Bang Khwang Prison. The lawyer believes the petition process will take about a year. Dr Wisut arrived at the Bangkok Southern Criminal Court yesterday morning looking cheerful as he greeted court officials. The smile soon faded from his face, however, as he listened for two hours to the 72-page verdict. Dr Phassaporn's father Chote Wattanachet welcomed the verdict. Her younger brother, Thanapong, said from Chiang Mai that justice had been served. Dr Wisut, formerly a well-known gynecologist at Chulalongkorn Hospital, and Dr Phassaporn, also a gynecologist working at the State Railway of Thailand Hospital, were married in 1981 and had two children. According to the verdict, their marriage became rocky towards the end of 1998 when Dr Phassaporn discovered her husband had been having an affair. On July 1, 1999, Dr Wisut moved out of the home they shared in the Makkasan area. After the separation, their conflict continued. Dr Wisut made an appointment to meet his estranged wife at a restaurant at the Siam Discovery shopping center in Pathumwan on February 20, 2001. He reportedly told his wife they needed to settle issues about their home. He is believed to have drugged her during the meal. Dr Wisut was seen escorting his wife, who looked drowsy, out of the restaurant. She has not been seen since. That same day, Dr Wisut checked in at Witthayaniwet Residence Hall at Chulalongkorn University, where he is believed to have killed his wife and dismembered her body. The following day, he left the university accommodation and checked in at the Sofitel Central Plaza Hotel. He had booked the room over a week before on February 13, the court verdict said. The court believes Dr Wisut disposed of his wife's remains by cutting up the flesh and flushing the pieces down the toilet at the university accommodation and later at the hotel. Pieces of flesh were found in the septic tanks at both sites and DNA tests confirmed they belonged to Dr Phassaporn. Just before the restaurant appointment, Dr Wisut had bought packages of small and large black plastic bags, 30 sedative pills and a large amount of toilet paper and odor-controlling tablets. The court believes he used the items to cover up the murder.
|