
|
| about this site |
who we are |
site map |
reading tips |
teaching tips |
student tips |
build vocab |
|
This column is for self
study or classroom use and gives guided help with reading the wide variety of writing styles and topics that appear as feature articles in the Bangkok Post. The lessons include background information, skill
building practice and vocabulary explanations.
|
|
It certainly seems, however, that the villagers are winning the public relations war. Their latest threat (read to find out what it is) has certainly got a lot of media attention. Carrying out the threat would be clearly illegal, however, so I doubt anything much will happen by the Friday deadline the villagers have set.
The villagers claim that airport authorities have not been sincere in their negotiations with the villagers. In one front-page story this morning, we read about villagers complaining that all they have received so far are earplugs, sleeping pills and stress relief drugs. The story below gives details on more serious complaints.
|
dispute an argument or a disagreement between two people, groups or countries
compensating |
residents people who live in an area
time-consuming
media |
sincere being honest; saying only what you really think or feel
negotiations |
Villagers undeterred by threats APINYA WIPATAYOTIN
Residents living nearby the airport continue to complain of extreme noise pollution from planes taking off and landing and are calling for the AoT to buy their houses so they can resettle in quieter areas. The residents said they would submit a petition to the AoT today, calling on the airport operator to adopt a runway management scenario that reduces the impact of noise on local communities and speeds up compensation payments to eligible recipients under an agreement signed by the AoT, the affected villagers, and the Treasury Department. The villagers also called on the AoT to look into the noise impact on communities living outside the official noise-hazard zone and come up with proper assistance, since they are also suffering from severe noise pollution from aircraft. ''We have to do it because the AoT has never shown sincerity in tackling the problem. The AoT has forced us to do such a thing,'' said Prasert Boonkaeo, spokesman of the alliance of 32 communities affected by aircraft noise. The villagers, from 32 communities around the airport in Samut Prakan's Bang Phli district, have threatened to disturb air traffic by launching balloons into the sky above the airport to protest the AoT's failure to follow through with compensation and noise pollution mitigation schemes. ''We will cancel the balloon operation if the AoT shows their sincerity in solving the problem. Solve the problem, and you will see no balloons in the sky this Friday,'' he told yesterday's press conference. The plan is worrying the authorities, who fear the balloons could cause an accident or, at the very least, damage the reputation of Suvarnabhumi airport. Deputy Transport Minister Sansern Wongcha-um also warned the residents that they would be breaking the law if they went ahead with the action. Mr Prasert said the villagers' finding that the AoT had quietly redrawn the map of the official noise-hazard zone, reducing the size of the area, was the last straw. Under the new mapping of the noise-hazard zone, approved by the cabinet on May 29, a number of households would be excluded from the compensation list, he said. The May 29 cabinet resolution also states that the AoT will buy back only houses suffering from noise of over 40 on the Noise Exposure Forecast (NEF) scale, or over 75 decibels. This is contrary to the Nov 21, 2006 resolution, under which the buy-back scheme covers houses affected by 35-40 on the NEF. NEF is the official method used for aircraft noise assessment. Wanchart Manathamsombat, the head of a committee representing some 32 communities, said as a result of the new noise-hazard mapping and the May 29 cabinet resolution, around 20% of households previously listed on the compensation list would be disqualified. The representatives have already lodged a complaint with the Administrative Court, seeking the revocation of the May 29 resolution. Meanwhile, a villager from Prapawan housing estate, around seven kilometers from the northern end of the western runway, claimed that the roof of his house was damaged by an object believed to have fallen from an aircraft on Aug 28. The object, which was a plastic bottle containing an oil-like substance, was sent to the AoT for verification to see if it had fallen from an aircraft.
|