Charnchai's new tape implicates
EC staff
Two Chart Thai MPs star in third
episode
Mongkol Bangprapa
and Anucha Charoenpo
Charnchai
Issarasenarak has a third tape-recorded conversation, which
allegedly implicates two pollwatchers in the leaking of classified
information to political parties.
The former Democrat MP alleged the third
cassette was of a telephone conversation between Sitthichai
Kittithanesuan, Chart Thai MP for Nakhon Nayok, and Sanya Bunlong,
son of Dej Bunlong, deputy leader of the same party.
Mr Charnchai alleged they were discussing
vote-buying tactics and mentioned two Election Commission staffers
in charge of investigations.
Mr Charnchai said it was the first time
he had publicly revealed the identities of the two callers,
but he stopped short of naming the poll officials implicated.
The tape is the third recording he claims
to have which allegedly features Chart Thai members. The first
recording is a phone conversation allegedly between Somsak Prisananathakul,
the deputy Chart Thai leader and deputy House speaker, and a
party member discussing vote-buying tactics.
A second tape, which was not released,
exposed an alleged affair between Chart Thai leader Banharn
Silpa-archa and Janista Liewchalermwong, a list-MP.
All implicated Chart Thai members denied
their involvement but Mr Charnchai insisted the tapes were genuine.
"How was it that the [Election Commission]
investigation summary found its way on to the street and copies
were publicly distributed around the country," he said.
He said the addresses of witnesses were
traced after the confidential information was exposed.
Mr Charnchai yesterday played the tape
for Vijit Yusuparb, the commission's secretary-general.
He vowed to submit documented evidence
today and present witnesses to Sawat Chotipanich, the panel
member in charge of the investigation.
He also provided senate members with
information on alleged vote fraud committed in Nakhon Nayok.
Mr Vijit said he still had to listen
to the tapes more carefully but had ordered pollwatchers referred
to on the tape to submit written explanations.
The commission needed more time to examine
all the tapes since there were so many of them, he said.
The tapes also had to authenticated,
he said, but scientific crime detection police yesterday postponed
their verdict on the Somsak tape.
A high-ranking police source said the
identify of the voice on the first tape could not be established
because comparisons could not be made with Mr Somsak's voice.
Recordings of his voice given to police
last week were insufficient.
Mr Somsak's voice apparently did not
match the voice on the tape but he refused to co-operate when
police asked him to repeat the remarks on the original tape.
The source said the US Federal Bureau
of Investigation certified the method of voice analysis used
and a conclusion was expected this weekend.