Bangkok Post: Forum

by **Veto** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:35 pm

I liked her sequel.... the one right after. Her English has a strong American accent. Perhaps she is in the states for some time.
One must remember PAD supporters were 60% women. She could be a cover girl for http://www.antithaksin.com :cheers:

by **Ian** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:39 pm

Veto wrote:I liked her sequel.... the one right after. Her English has a strong American accent. Perhaps she is in the states for some time.
One must remember PAD supporters were 60% women. She could be a cover girl for http://www.antithaksin.com

" PAD supporters were 60% women" there is a good sociological reason for this, women are the homemakers and preservers of tradition. PAD wanted to return to a glorified, paternalistic, imaginary past.

by **Profiler** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:04 pm

Ian wrote:
Veto wrote:I liked her sequel.... the one right after. Her English has a strong American accent. Perhaps she is in the states for some time.
One must remember PAD supporters were 60% women. She could be a cover girl for http://www.antithaksin.com

" PAD supporters were 60% women" there is a good sociological reason for this, women are the homemakers and preservers of tradition. PAD wanted to return to a glorified, paternalistic, imaginary past.

So the PAD women are every mans dream? :lol:

by **Veto** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:25 pm

Ian wrote:
" PAD supporters were 60% women" there is a good sociological reason for this, women are the homemakers and preservers of tradition. PAD wanted to return to a glorified, paternalistic, imaginary past.

I just googled Thailand demographics, women to men. Apparently women outnumber men . 1.64 babies born are female. Last time I checked that's a big majority. Isn't that what the reds want? Majority rules? (or is it majority serves?) :cheers:

by **pachangamac042** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:36 pm

So, now suddenly this is my topic? Somebody could have said something to me. Just for curiosity, what is my topic about? I must have some degree of dementia, because I can not remember what it is about or that invited scy… to join. But who knows, maybe scy… is the one with the proof? Maybe I should just delete my first post and let Profiler take over. :lol:

by **Profiler** on Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:05 pm

pachangamac042 wrote:So, now suddenly this is my topic? Somebody could have said something to me. Just for curiosity, what is my topic about? I must have some degree of dementia, because I can not remember what it is about or that invited scy… to join. But who knows, maybe scy… is the one with the proof? Maybe I should just delete my first post and let Profiler take over.

Don't mind me, just here to make Scy miserable :lol:

by **Ian** on Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:56 pm

Profiler wrote:
pachangamac042 wrote:So, now suddenly this is my topic? Somebody could have said something to me. Just for curiosity, what is my topic about? I must have some degree of dementia, because I can not remember what it is about or that invited scy… to join. But who knows, maybe scy… is the one with the proof? Maybe I should just delete my first post and let Profiler take over.

Don't mind me, just here to make Scy miserable

But I thought scy was always miserable, isn't that why he argues with everyone? :?:

by **Profiler** on Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:03 pm

Ian wrote:
Profiler wrote:
pachangamac042 wrote:So, now suddenly this is my topic? Somebody could have said something to me. Just for curiosity, what is my topic about? I must have some degree of dementia, because I can not remember what it is about or that invited scy… to join. But who knows, maybe scy… is the one with the proof? Maybe I should just delete my first post and let Profiler take over.

Don't mind me, just here to make Scy miserable

But I thought scy was always miserable, isn't that why he argues with everyone?

Probably but "he" mentioned a while back that he was actually "we"... :lol: