What's wrong with two airports?
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
I don't know why the military cannot relocate to Utopou. (I know it is navy there, but they should be able to work together)
I don't know what the likes of Fedex, UPS, etc do in Europe with all the airports there so I cannot say much on the subject.
My sphere of knowledge is based more on passenger traffic.
I still feel it was a bad move to close Don Mueang completly as they did initially, bearing in mind quantity of passenger traffic as it was there and what Suvarnabhumis' current maximum capacity is. It never made sense to me.
With regards to the other item you mentioned, many have described it as a shopping complex with an airport attached.
-

stilljustbrowsing - Posts: 2373
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:47 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
There were a lot of staff cuts at Gatwick...as BA withdrew to a centralised Heathrow hub...in order to keep its overheads down. Lots of BA routes from Gatwick were sold off to other airlines in order for them to concentrate their maintenance personnel in a single place. I see no reason for Thai Airways not to do the same.
Personally, I think that the major carriers should operate out of Cobra Swamp (I love calling it that too SJB) and the low budget airlines should operate out of DM. You pay for what you get and if it means travelling across Bangkok to get that cheaper flight then so be it. However, major carriers and connections to other destinations within, or outside Thailand should pass through BKK.
BTW when I have watched air traffic into Cobra Swamp (BKK)...I find it pretty light in comparison to other major airports...so how come it is said that it started operations at almost full capacity? I mean it wasn't exactly one 'heavy' every couple of minutes when I was watching...Not enough gates I suppose?? How about a Terminal 5
-

prommee_NE - Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 7:00 am
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
DMK is also a safety back up for planes with trouble taking off from Suvarnaboomy.
I don't like Suvarnaboomy anyway, always preferred DMK.
-

Marrtin - Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 9:57 am
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
-

stilljustbrowsing - Posts: 2373
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:47 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
BTW, do you kow why TG seem to have reverted back to the 747-400's...they were using the A340's a lot...but don't see them much any more...or is it that they just took them off certain routes?
-

prommee_NE - Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 7:00 am
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
Hence what I consider to be a lack of forethought with regards to costs and finacial control. Remember, this was Mr. T's "baby!"
The whole project was pushed through to meet deadlines rather than sensibility.
Regarding the Airbus 330 and 340, capacity is essentially the same depending on the original purchasers requirements.
The biggest difference is that one has 2 (330) engines, the other has 4. (340, which I believe are for sale from TG)
I don't want to get into trade offs and safety here with regards to costs, but obviously, maintaining an aircraft with 4 engines and associated systems is going to be more expensive than a similar aircraft that only has 2 engines and associated systems.
Do a search for "ETOPS" (Extended Twin Engine [color=#FF0000]OPeration S) to understand more.
Most major airports around the world, as I stated previously have no land interconnectivety, each becoming it's own hub with connecting flights at the same airport.
-

stilljustbrowsing - Posts: 2373
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:47 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
we need do the best for the nation to have more jobs for the people.
those of you who think of saving money by having one airport are selfish capitalists serving your own intrests and filling your pocket with more money than it can hold.
two airports will help thai ppl , make things move faster create more job and life and drive in the country. we get so many visitors for all over the world we have enough travel movement to have not two but three airports.
-

nolikegohome - Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:57 pm
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
The global economy is still a mess, more people are "holidaying at home", airlines are cutting back on scheduled flights. (and even grounding/selling some of their aircraft)
Manufacturing output is being reduced, oil prices are starting to rise again! (what a mess hey?)
All of this, compounded by some peoples view (internationally,) of Thailands' political situation and troubles in the south do not help.
I do not see this problem being resolved anytime soon.
-

stilljustbrowsing - Posts: 2373
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:47 am
- Location: Bangkok
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
-

Sean Moran - Posts: 696
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 7:00 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia.
Re: what's wrong with two airports?
-

stilljustbrowsing - Posts: 2373
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:47 am
- Location: Bangkok
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

