|
Gadget News & Review
By Jay Dougherty, dpa
Washington - Thinking of moving to Windows Vista? Whether you are or not,
it's becoming more difficult to ignore Microsoft's latest operating
system, as it comes pre-installed on many new computers and generates
all the buzz in the papers.
Behind all the fanfare, though, lies a seldom discussed secret:
Vista may not be right for everyone - at least not yet, and perhaps not
for quite some time. And XP, meanwhile, has just gotten better and
better. It continues to be the workhorse operating system that can
serve most users the best.
You can spend a lot of money and time preparing your equipment to
run Vista, only to find that after all the effort, you really had
everything you needed in Windows XP - and then some. So it pays to go
into any migration to Vista with eyes wide open. Here's a blow-by-blow
rundown of just what you'll be getting yourself into with Vista
compared to XP.
XP is faster
You can throw a lot of hardware - and money - at Windows Vista and
still end up with a computer that is considerably more sluggish than
your XP machine.
Part of the issue with Vista is actually perceived sluggishness.
The new interface is designed to mask, to some degree, how long
operations are taking by distracting you with various visual effects:
dialog boxes that open gradually, a pulsating circle that appears
whenever some disk action is taking place, animation effects that let
you see a minimised application gradually expand when called to the
forefront.
At first, the visual effects may very well wow you. But after a
while, when you just want to get your work done in the minimum amount
of time, you may very well come to long for the snappiness of XP's
interface.
The sad thing, too, is that today's dual core and quad core
computers can really make XP perform quicker than you've ever seen it
perform before. But with Vista, even the best of these boxes provide
what appears to be just adequate performance.
XP is compatible
Microsoft has gone a long way in ensuring that Windows Vista is
compatible with the majority of popular applications in use today. But
"majority" won't mean anything to you if the one or two applications
that you consider critical won't work under Vista or won't work as they
should.
Virtually every Windows-based program will run under XP. That means
that usually you won't need to give a second thought to compatibility.
Run Vista, on the other hand, and you'll be visiting the Web sites of
manufacturers on a fairly regular basis looking for Vista compatibility
information or patches that make current software run properly under
the new operating system. You'll also be learning about "compatibility
mode" in Vista - a feature that allows you to specify that an older
program should be run in a special mode under Vista that may enable the
program to run without issues.
And software won't be your only concern with Vista. Printer,
scanner, and other hardware manufacturers may or may not provide Vista
drivers for their products. HP, for instance, is not providing Vista
drivers for the popular and not-so-old LaserJet 1012 home printer.
XP is familiar
The interface of Windows XP may not be nearly as attractive as that
of Vista. But that snazzy new look that Vista sports has its downsides,
too. First, because a lot of things look and work differently in Vista
than they did in XP, you'll spend a good deal of time re-learning
common tasks.
Want quick access to some setting in the Display Properties dialog
box, for instance? In Vista, you'll learn that the features formerly
found in the Display Properties dialog box you're used to are now split
up into several dialog boxes accessible from the redesigned Control
Panel. There are literally dozens of examples of similar features that
you'll have to relearn once you make the move to Vista.
The relearning wouldn't be so bad if the payoff were greater. But
what many come to feel about Vista is that the interface changes are
among the operating system's primary "improvements." In previous
versions of Windows, interface changes were just a part of an operating
system upgrade that included many, many technological advancements.
Because a lot of technical improvements were stripped out of Vista
mid-way through the development cycle, however, what users are left
with is a new interface that requires relearning, along with a few new
features - such as integrated search and security enhancements - that
are nice to have but certainly available elsewhere as free add-ins to
XP.
XP is mature
Millions upon millions of computer users have pounded on Windows XP
for years. The result: Microsoft has had plenty of time to fix bugs
that were identified after the initial release. Service Pack 2 for XP
has been available for XP for some time, and Service Pack 3 - rumoured
to include just rollups of bug patches, as well as Internet Explorer 7
- is slated to ship next year.
Compare that type of maturity with Vista, which reportedly was
shipped with a long list of bugs still unaddressed, and you'd be
hard-pressed to argue that Vista is ready for any type of critical
production environment. Most corporations, in fact, won't even consider
rolling out a new OS like Vista before the first service pack is
released. Should you?
XP is flexible
If you really just can't stand the look and feel of Windows XP,
there are ways to make it look like Vista - or a lot of other things,
as well, thanks to the many "skins" in circulation. Repositories such
as WinCustomize (http://www.wincustomize.com) provide plenty of options
for changing the look and feel of XP, and many of these customisations
are well tested and reviewed.
Make no mistake: Vista can be fun to work with, and there's no
denying that the overhaul that Microsoft gave the interface made the
whole operating system more attractive.
But there remain enough issues with Vista that a move to the new
software should probably be undertaken only by those who want or need
to stay on the cutting edge of technology - and those who understand
the risks.
|
|
Reviews |
|
|
News |
|
|
 |
|
|
|