Nida poll director quits after suspected government interference

Confidence in the regime has been seriously shaken

The head of the Nida Poll, Arnond Sakworawich (inset) resigns after the junta successfully demanded that Nida suppress his survey showing 85% of the public don't believe Gen Prawit's explanation about the watches.
The head of the Nida Poll, Arnond Sakworawich (inset) resigns after the junta successfully demanded that Nida suppress his survey showing 85% of the public don't believe Gen Prawit's explanation about the watches.

The Nida poll director has vowed to quit after a poll he conducted relating to Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwon's luxury watch scandal was suppressed.

Many observers think the government put pressure on the institute, persuading its rector to step in and prevent the poll from being published.

Social media lit up on Sunday with criticism of the government for interfering, forcing its spokesman to deny the claim.

According to a source, the poll indicates that up to 85% of respondents do not believe Gen Prawit's explanation that his luxury watches were borrowed from friends. This damning statistic threatens to further undermine public confidence in the way the government has handled the scandal.

"Although I support the coup and government, if [I see] that something isn't right or just, I don't have to 'lick top boot,'" said poll director Arnond Sakworawich in a message posted on Facebook on Sunday, explaining his decision to resign. He had been in the job just two weeks, working on three polls in that time.

Mr Arnond said that, as an academic, he has to present the facts plainly, and he would never betray that principle or the people. He stressed that a person holding a management post in any academic institution must pursue academic freedom and show ethical courage.

"If I can't maintain these things, there's no reason for me to stay in the office," he said.

He and his team tried to conduct the poll with academic integrity and present the information accurately and carefully. 

"But then one of the staff at Nida told me the rector had ordered any politically-related poll to be reviewed by him and that he ordered a halt to this poll," he said.

"I think [the rector] is afraid, but I'm not. I respect him, as he was my teacher. But academically, I have the right to be myself."

The suppression of this latest poll came after the results of another survey were published showing that the majority of respondents doubt the transparency of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO).

It showed that 76.3% of respondents thought there were "irregularities" in the NCPO led by Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and in his government itself, while only 16.64% had confidence in its transparency. The other 7.04% declined to answer.

About half of respondents doubted the willingness of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to conduct a genuine investigation into such high-ranking politicians as Gen Prawit.

Pheu Thai Party legal adviser Ruangkrai Leekijwattana said he suspected influential figures had interfered in the recent poll's suppression as they could see the government's popularity declining, particularly due to the watch scandal.

Government spokesman Lt Gen Sansern Kaewkamnerd denied the government had tried to block the poll results and insisted it was not trying to curb academic freedom.

Mr Arnond's resignation should not be linked to the government and the deputy prime minister's watches, he added.

Meanwhile, Nida president Pradit Wanarat said he is the person accountable for the decision to halt the poll. Since the case of Gen Prawit is still being investigated by the NACC, the poll results might influence public opinion.

The rector also stressed that Nida Poll has always tried to uphold academic freedom, adding that once Gen Prawit's case reaches completion, the committee will review the poll again. He would discuss the matter with Mr Arnond today. 

Learn from listening

Click play to listen to audio for this story, or download to save the file
: :

Vocabulary

  • accountable: responsible for something that has happened -
  • betray: to deliberately do something that harms someone who needs your support - หักหลัง ทรยศ
  • curb: to control or limit something - จำกัดขอบเขต, ควบคุม
  • damning (adj): critical of somebody/something; suggesting that somebody is guilty - ซึ่งเป็นเครื่องพิสูจน์ความผิด
  • decline: to say politely that you will not accept something or do something - ปฏิเสธ
  • doubt (verb): to think that something is probably not true, that it probably won't happen or that it probably does not exist - สงสัย
  • ethical: involving the principles used for deciding what is right and what is wrong - ตามหลักจรรยา
  • genuine: real; honest - แท้
  • halt: a stop - การหยุด, การหยุดชั่วครา
  • integrity: the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles that you refuse to change - ความซื่อสัตย์, ความซื่อตรง
  • principle: a basic belief, theory, or rule that has a major influence on the way in which something is done; a moral rule or standard of good behavior - กฎ, ข้อปฏิบัติ, หลักปฏิบัติ
  • rector: the person in charge in some universities, schools, colleges and universities - อธิการบดี
  • suppression: stopping opposition or protests using force or strict laws; crackdown - การใช้กำลังเข้าปราบปรามของเจ้าหน้าที่
  • threaten: to put at risk; to put in danger - ทำให้ตกอยู่ในความเสี่ยง
  • transparency: an honest way of doing things that allows other people to know exactly what you are doing - ความโปร่งใส
  • undermine: to make something or someone become gradually less effective or successful - ทำให้อ่อนลง,ทำลายทีละน้อย,ทำลายอย่างลับ
  • uphold: to defend or keep to a principle or law; to show that you support something by what you say or do - รับรอง พิทักษ์รักษา ยืนหนัด
  • willingness (noun): not objecting to doing something; having no reason for not doing something - ความเต็มใจ, ความสมัครใจ
Do you like the content of this article?
COMMENT
MORE IN SECTION