Burma junta defends Suu Kyi court ban

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Asia

Burma junta defends Suu Kyi court ban

  • Published: 16/09/2009 at 03:01 PM
  • Online news: Asia

Burma's state media on Thursday defended the ruling junta's decision to bar opposition icon Aung San Suu Kyi from court during final arguments in her appeal against her detention.

File photo of the High Court building in Rangoon. Burma's state media on Thursday defended the ruling junta's decision to bar opposition icon Aung San Suu Kyi from court during final arguments in her appeal against her detention.

The Nobel laureate was convicted on August 11 of breaching security laws after an American swam to her house. She was sentenced to three years' hard labour but junta chief Than Shwe cut the term to 18 months' house arrest.

Her lawyers say the military regime has denied her permission to attend court on Friday to hear closing submissions in her appeal, but government mouthpiece newspapers said the decision was in line with the law.

"According to the practices of the courts, any defendants are not sent to the tribunal," a commentary in the English-language New Light of Burma daily said.

"If the defendant is a prisoner, there is no need to summon him to the court for his statements," said the editorial, which also appeared in state-run Burmese language newspapers.

"Courts hear criminal cases in accordance with the existing laws.... Therefore, it is fair to say that Burma's judicial practice meets the judicial principles," it said.

The article did not mention Suu Kyi's name nor her party but it was published one day after Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy said the decision to bar her from the appeal court was "not justice".

The 64-year-old pro-democracy leader appealed against the verdict earlier this month.

Eccentric US national John Yettaw was sentenced to seven years' hard labour at the same trial for swimming uninvited to her lakeside house in May, but the regime freed him last month after a visit by US Senator Jim Webb.

The guilty verdict against Suu Kyi sparked international outrage and the imposition of further sanctions against Burma's powerful generals, who have already kept the frail Suu Kyi locked up for 14 of the past 20 years.

Her extended house arrest keeps her off the scene for elections promised by the regime some time in 2010, adding to widespread criticism that the polls are a sham designed to legitimise the junta's grip on power.

In New York, Human Rights Watch said in a report released Wednesday that the number of political prisoners in Burma had doubled to more than 2,200 in the two years since a crackdown on protests led by Buddhist monks.

The "brutality" of the military government had been highlighted by the latest detention term ordered against Suu Kyi, the group said.

"Burma's generals are planning elections next year that will be a sham if their opponents are in prison," said Tom Malinowski, an HRW official.

The NLD won a landslide victory in the country's last elections in 1990 but was never allowed to take power by the military, which has ruled the country since 1962.

US President Barack Obama's acting point man on Burma also urged the regime to free all political prisoners as he said that a review of US policy on the country, including sanctions, was almost complete.

"It is so important that we not forget about these people," Scot Marciel, deputy assistant secretary, East Asia and Pacific bureau, and ambassador for Asean affairs, said at the launch of the HRW report.

About the author

Writer: AFP

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Paul Barasi

    Discussion 2 : 17/09/2009 at 04:02 AM2

    Imagine for a moment this courtroom ban from the Junta's viewpoint. Can you think of one reason why this helps them internally or externally?Dictators are sickos but why must they also always be thickos?

    What do Hillary Clinton and Ban Ki-moon have in their diaries for 18 September more important than attending Suu Kyi’s hearing? Why haven't they at least tried to send Justice Observers? What is the US policy review on Burma really about - doe the White House not know the history? Have they not read the new constitution? Burma's 2010 elections will make Mugabe look like a democrat!

    Where are the stiffer sanctions and arms embargo? What is the UN actually doing and with what results? And what is going to happen: a deepening humanitarian disaster, a full blown civil war?

    Look at the sequence:(1)UN is soft on the Burmese Junta; (2)US announces Burma policy review; (3) Suu Kyi now barred from her own appeal hearing. Go figure!

  • Ursus

    Discussion 1 : 16/09/2009 at 05:52 PM1

    Her appeal will be rejected and we realize once more that the generals do not have any serious intention to hold fair elections next year.
    After the elections they will rule the country like before with scare tactics and brutality against their People and ethnic minorities but call themselves "legally democratic elected"!

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top