Defence seeks to tear holes in 'botched' Koh Tao murder probe

Defence seeks to tear holes in 'botched' Koh Tao murder probe

###Deckdeck

KOH SAMUI: Lawyers defending two Myanmar migrant workers on trial for the 2014 murders of two British backpackers on Koh Tao sought yesterday to expose holes in a police investigation they maintain was botched and intended to frame the suspects.

The conduct of the police and treatment of the country's huge Myanmar migrant-labour force has been central to the trial of the young men accused of killing Hannah Witheridge, 23, and David Miller, 24, a year ago last week.

Post-mortem examinations showed the victims suffered severe head wounds and Witheridge was raped, but lawyers and activists say the two Myanmar accused, Zaw Lin and Win Zaw Htun, both 22, have been made scapegoats for the killings.

The hearings are taking place on Koh Samui, where the defence would present a statement from a British expert who has analysed surveillance-camera footage being used as evidence.

The expert was contacted by Briton Andy Hall, who specialises in protecting the rights of labourers and exposing abuses.

"We saw a lot of instances of police abuse and torture... and a concern for us is that the police were just focusing on ways to nail the two defendants," Mr Hall said.

"We believe, from my investigation, that they blocked out so much other evidence that could have been used... simply to focus on the two accused," he said, referring to the police.

Police have stood by their probe and Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has said "nobody would dare" go after the wrong suspects because the case was so high-profile.

The defence has used the country's foremost forensics expert to scrutinise DNA samples that police said tied the two men to the murders. The court has heard that DNA found on the murder weapon did not match that of the defendants. The court ordered a re-examination of the samples after police said they had lost the DNA, then contradicted themselves.

Defence lawyer Nakhon Chompuchat yesterday said his duty was to convince the judge to question whether the evidence had sufficient credibility to convict the men.

Do you like the content of this article?
COMMENT