Farmers up in arms at herb listing

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Farmers up in arms at herb listing

Chilli, turmeric, ginger branded 'hazardous'

  • Published: 11/02/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Farmers and traditional medicine experts have reacted angrily to the listing of 13 widely used herbal plants as hazardous substances, suggesting there is a hidden agenda that favours chemical companies.

The Industry Ministry listed the 13 plants as hazardous substances to control production and commercialisation.

The plants are widely used among farmers as alternatives for expensive and toxic farm chemicals, pesticides and herbicides.

The announcement on listing the plants as "hazardous substances type 1" under the 1992 Hazardous Substances Act was approved by Industry Minister Charnchai Chairungruang last month. It took effect on Feb 3.

Proposed by the Department of Agriculture, which is a member of the hazardous substances committee, the announcement requires growers, manufacturers, importers and exporters of pesticides, herbicides and plant disease control substances made from the 13 herbal plants to follow safety and quality control regulations issued by the committee. Otherwise they will face six months in jail and/or a fine of 50,000 baht.

Farmer advocates yesterday said putting the herbal plants on the controlled list would hurt growers as they could no longer produce, trade and use botanical pesticides and herbicides freely.

Farmers and producers of the organic substances might have to pay more for registration, packaging and testing as required by the law, said Witoon Lianchamroon, of Biothai, a non-government organisation working on organic farming.

He suspected the motive behind the listing.

Multinational chemical companies are expected to benefit once production and commercialisation of the alternative substances is curbed, he said.

Large numbers of farmers have switched recently from imported chemicals to botanical substances as they are much cheaper and safer, he said.

"Instead of tightening controls on these farmer-friendly herbal plants, the committee should crack down on multinational companies who exploit Thai farmers by luring them into buying their highly toxic and costly products," Mr Witoon said.

Tussanee Verakan, coordinator of the Alternative Agriculture Network, said the committee produced the list in secret without consulting farmers who would be the hardest-hit.

"The government keeps promoting organic farming and reduction of chemical use," she said.

"Why did they put such heavy restrictions on organic substances which are the heart of organic farming?"

Department deputy chief Jirakorn Kosaisevi insisted the listing was aimed at protecting benefits for farmers.

"The announcement is not intended to protect chemical producers," Mr Jirakorn said.

"These botanical pesticides are widely used and traded. They should be controlled to ensure they are up to standard."

The new regulation would help promote herbal products, he said.

Department for Development of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine deputy director-general Prapot Paetrakas said the 13 plants were core materials in herbal medicines. Controlling their manufacture and trade could affect the herbal medicine industry, he said.

The department will discuss the issue with legal experts and others on Friday.

About the author

Writer: KULTIDA SAMABUDDHI and APIRADEE TREERUTKUARKUL

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Eddie

    Discussion 81 : 16/07/2009 at 02:46 AM81

    If this Mandatory "flu" shot happens in a few months, people will be too busy burying their dead to concentrate on much else...they say only a 4% rate of death from vaccines, but will 300 million inb our country alone...12 million+ and if world wide...innumerable!!!

  • Professor L A Damani

    Discussion 80 : 16/03/2009 at 11:37 AM80

    Herbal Agrochemicals – Always Safe?


    There has been a lot of coverage recently in the pages of the Bangkok Post of the decision by the Industry Ministry to list 13 traditional Thai herbs as hazardous substances. Of course those herbs that have long been used in food are safe. However, preparation of concentrated extracts of these herbs and their use for spraying onto plants is an entirely different proposition, since that may lead to lung (inhalational) and skin (dermal) exposure of plant derived chemicals at high concentrations to the user. Nonetheless, gardeners and farmers growing food for their own consumption, can presumably use these without any restrictions from governments. Farmers using these products, or manufacturers supplying these as commercial products, for pest control in food crops for sale to the public, have to be aware that the consumer protection laws of any country prohibit the supply of defective, or sub-standard, or harmful products. If the use of uncontrolled “natural pesticidal preparations” leads to any harm to the farmers or the public through consumption of these foods, then the full force of the laws would be applied to these parties.

    It makes sense that the manufacturers should be required to do some basic product testing, which need not necessarily be cost prohibitive. This would include, (a) tests for quality and standardization to ensure consistency of the pesticidal product (b) tests for stability of the marketed product, so that expiry dates can be printed on the label, (c) tests to check the stability of the plant chemicals after application on to plant parts exposed to sunlight, since many chemicals are known to undergo chemical change (photooxidation) to potentially toxic compounds, (d) tests to demonstrate efficacy of various strengths of the final spray solution of the marketed products, in both laboratory and controlled field trials, against a variety of crop pests at various stages in their growth cycle, so that the farmers have a clear understanding of which product and strength they need to use against a particular pest, (e) tests to develop products that are not only stable & efficacious, but also have rain-resistance built into the formulation design; it is no point in using a product if the first rainfall after application washes away the pesticide, (f) tests to ascertain whether the chemicals present in these products, or any formed subsequently via sun exposure, are readily washable from food before consumption, and measurement of “residues” in plant parts and soil to check for persistence, (g) some simple safety tests to ensure the product cause no harm to farmers who accidently comes into skin contact with the product, and finally (h) some animal tests to ensure that inhalation of fine particles of the spray do not cause lung toxicity. The basic message is that just because these herbs are safely used orally does not mean that concentrated extracts from them not toxic to the skin or lungs, when compared to the toxic synthetic chemical pesticides. Remember that “natural” does not always equate to “safe”; many of the most powerful human toxins are from “natural” sources, e.g. ricin & strychnine from plants and tetrodotoxin from the puffer fish. A large number of Thai academics, often with support from the National Innovation Agency and a few industrial companies, are already contributing to the safety of Thai citizens by conducting some excellent research on plant extracts with pesticidal properties; now it is the time for all the “natural agrochemical” companies to step up to the plate and fund some of this research, which in my view is necessary for the protection of the farmers and the public.

    The misunderstanding that has caused all the rage is primarily the fault of the relevant ministries for not clearly explaining the reasoning behind the proposed new regulations through consultative meetings with those affected by these proposed rule change prior to their introduction. . It is noteworthy that the kind of testing I outline above is already required, or under advanced discussion, by regulatory authorities in many western countries for herbs used in medicine, in dietary supplement, or in cosmetic & other personal care products, and even ASEAN has a working group examining this issue. A product registration dossier should really be necessary for registration of all agrochemicals (not just pesticides), irrespective of whether they are synthetic or “natural”. For the latter, the documentation could perhaps include both the data from the aforementioned scientific tests, and the wealth of accumulated folklore knowledge from the long-term use of such herbal preparations by farmers over centuries. Perhaps this registration process could be voluntary in the first 5 years; those companies acquiring governmental registration would soon have a commercial advantage, and this would soon spur the rest of the “natural agrochemical” companies into conducting the appropriate testing to register their products. Without this type of governmental registration process, the farmers would really be at the mercy of unscrupulous entrepreneurial companies that supply unstandardised and untested products, that may either not be efficacious , or be of variable efficacy.

    Professor L A Damani
    Songkhla

  • Akira

    Discussion 79 : 25/02/2009 at 07:43 PM79

    This smells like Monsanto aka Codex Alimentarius...

  • Outraged and incensed

    Discussion 78 : 15/02/2009 at 07:59 PM78

    How blatantly obviously wicked to deny people the use of these beneficial herbs.

  • Donna

    Discussion 77 : 15/02/2009 at 07:14 AM77

    Sure can smell Monsanto in the shadows. Trying to
    do to Thailand, & other countries, what they have done in India. Farmers in India that have been broken in financial ruin and spirit now commit suicide by drinking Monsanto's pesticide which causes seed genetical altering. Control the food
    sources, control the people.

  • Jenny

    Discussion 76 : 14/02/2009 at 10:24 AM76

    Completely unacceptable and the Thai government should be reversing this list IMMEDIATELY.

    This could devastate Thailand's herb industry and small farmers, who are already struggling, could be completely destitute by the end of the year.

    Stop pandering to large companies, who are obviously behind this. All that's going to happen is their greed will continue, and honest Thais will suffer.

    Every day, yet another stupid thing happens in Thailand and Thailand continues to shoot itself in the foot. Really, how much more stupid can Thailand become?

  • natureboy

    Discussion 75 : 13/02/2009 at 01:55 AM75

    Forgive me please, I may be repeating what is already known...

    Hardworking citizens may sometimes forget that they are in a social system. Hardworking officials may sometimes forget their roots and similarities.

    When a powerful merchant (whatever they are selling) meets an official with "an offer that cannot be refused", the hazards may or may not be immediately obvious, no matter the character of the official, good or not-yet.

    Evil gets its strength to prey upon us from our negative feelings. Evil often enters with a too- hasty decision. The great problem with a preference for evil behavior is that it cannot remain hidden. Nature always answers that with loneliness. The same old cravings for more of the too-hasty solutions never satisfy. Is this why Nature is mistaken for an enemy?

    Good puppies, if fed poorly, become bad dogs with big teeth. It is we who must remind them of better times and show them better food than feeding on us. If they can't feed on us, they have only their own.

    Discuss issues kindly & firmly. Educate everyone openly. Show people a chance to do the right things. Missing a good thing really is worse than suffering a bad thing.

    Specifically, wwwfarmtoconsumer.org is a legal defense organization for farmers. Perhaps also contact them for some successful advice. The larger herb companies in the US already have some experience in this trouble. Get good help. Give good help.

    Methi parathas and real Thai tea for lunch, mmm. Blessed Be Thailand. Thanks for your time.

  • KaySan

    Discussion 74 : 13/02/2009 at 12:56 AM74

    Shame and dishonor upon you, Jirakorn Kosaisevi-and your family for raising you to act this way- and all members of your misguided Department of Agriculture.

    Know this:

    The world is watching. Those who act from greed, fear and hunger for power will find their hearts eaten away to a cold hollow core and their lives shallow and desperate. The beauty in life that you destroy will be your own as well.

    You still have a chance for redemption, though. Dismiss this proposal and embrace the higher law of nature and see that all creation is a gift to be cherished- not regulated.

  • Somnoon

    Discussion 73 : 12/02/2009 at 03:40 AM73

    One of the appointed minister by Abhisit is a former executive from the CP Group, don't you remember? And do you think he has nothing to do with this? CP's (Thanin) was caugth redhanded trying to buy his way for $50,000.00 to meet with former President Clinton.

    All big companies in Thailand have high ranking officials, generals, bank executives sit on their boards because of their power, influence, and connection. I sat in a few of those Board of Directors meetings with a company well-known name in Bangkok on display everyday, and that what those people are for.

  • Scott

    Discussion 72 : 12/02/2009 at 03:27 AM72

    Looks like the evil Federal Banking control and FDA is helping large evil partner companies like Monsanto monopolize another facet of the natural market and turning the eviroment into more poison for everyone to consume and breath!

    More poison coming to a town near you - worldwide!

    Eugenics and population reduction at its finest.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top