Institute agrees to study reforms

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Institute agrees to study reforms

Puea Thai rejects plan, doubts PM's sincerity

  • Published: 10/03/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

King Prajadhipok's Institute has accepted the invitation to study political reforms under former charter writer Suchit Bunbongkan. It has given itself eight months to complete the task.

The decision was greeted with mixed reactions. The People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) welcomed it but it was opposed by the opposition Puea Thai party.

The institute agreed at a meeting yesterday to take up the mission after being approached by the government which wanted a neutral body to look into political reforms. King Prajadhipok's Institute (KPI) is a public organisation set up by parliament.

A preliminary plan was unveiled by institute council member Somkid Lertpaitoon. It set a deadline of eight months to complete the study which includes the key issue of how the constitution should be amended.

The study will form the framework to be used by constitution writers.

Mr Somkid expected it would then take three months to form a team of drafters and eight months to write a new constitution. The entire process will take about 19 months. The institute's task will end after it completes the study.

KPI secretary-general Borwornsak Uwanno said it would be up to the government to accept the results.

The study will be undertaken by a committee led by Mr Sujit of no more than 50 people. It will be made up of lawmakers from the lower and upper houses, academics, and representatives of the government, opposition parties, the PAD, the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), the armed forces, the public and private sectors, the press and non-government organisations.

KPI deputy secretary-general Wootisan Tunchai said each group could nominate its representatives, while the institute would approach potential committee members.

Mr Borwornsak promised the panel would be independent even though it would be funded by the government.

Mr Sujit, who is chairman of the Political Development Council, said the task would be difficult because of high hopes that the reforms would bring an end to political conflicts.

He pledged to block political interference with the panel but cautioned reforms should not be seen as a magic pill to cure all political problems.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva insisted all parties would have a say in the political reform study.

PAD coordinator Suriyasai Katasila said the alliance was prepared to take part in the study unless the panel planned amendments to the charter that would pardon transgressors from the Thaksin Shinawatra administration.

Key PAD members would not join the panel, instead sending academics or allies to represent them, he said.

Puea Thai protested at a political reform study being led by Mr Sujit and doubted the sincerity of the government to carry out its aims.Opposition chief whip and Puea Thai MP for Ayutthaya Withaya Buranasiri said the choice of Mr Sujit was unacceptable. Since Mr Sujit was known to be connected with the coup makers who toppled Thaksin, Mr Sujit's impartiality was in doubt, he said.

Mr Withaya said eight months was too long for the study. It should actually take no longer than three months as every party was already aware of the political problems and eight months meant it would be too late to tackle them, he said.

Puea Thai spokesman Prompong Nopparit accused the prime minister of trying to buy time for himself by assigning the political reform study to KPI.

Thammasat University deputy rector Parinya Thewanarumitkul said the government should take the lead in studying political reforms with KPI acting in a supporting role.

By assigning the study to KPI, the government could be regarded as avoiding the responsibility for political reforms or even delaying them, Mr Parinya said.

About the author

Writer: POST REPORTERS

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Dicky

    Discussion 3 : 11/03/2009 at 03:57 AM3

    I think the whole constitution thing is a bit of a distraction from errors of government... Forget the constitution; clean up politics; clean up the law enforcement; reform education and tackle the idea of a sustainable future.

    When the house is in order, write the rules, then the constitution will not need a rewrite every time there is a new Prime Minister... In the mean time follow the principles of buddhism as a guide.

  • Somboon

    Discussion 2 : 11/03/2009 at 02:43 AM2

    Wait and see what they will do with freedom to speech, either through newspapers, radio, internet and so forth.

    Wait and see how they will get the Army, Police, and Judicial System separate from each other.

    Wait and see how they will deal with class, status, influence, wealth, and so forth.

    Wait and see how neutral they will be.

    Wait and see if they will be pulled or pushed by anyone.

  • meow meow

    Discussion 1 : 10/03/2009 at 10:10 AM1

    Thailand needs to develop a strong sense of stability in its government. This constant turmoil is not good for the political process or for the country.

    The constitution needs to be amended so that elected officials stay in power until their established term ends. The current process allows for a party to be removed from office through protests, intimidation, and system abuse. A country the size of Thailand should not have so much political upheaval. It never seems to end.

    There needs to be established terms of office of either four years or six years. Once an election has occurred, the other parties would then need to develop a working relationship with the party in office until the next election when they would be free to campaign for office.

    The constant desire to reform must, at some point, come up with a process that works better than what is in place now. Coups, debates, and the constant effort to have votes of no confidence makes it hard for any governing officials to make progress in addressing the countries issues. The King's institute needs to look for ways to develop long term stability in the government which will in turn develop long stability for Thailand.

    If people in office are then found to be corrupt, they need to be prosecuted and sent to prison. Such behaviour is criminal, simple as that.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top