Jet fighters used to make rain, not war

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Jet fighters used to make rain, not war

  • Published: 18/03/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

The air force is using two Alpha Jet fighters this summer to help the Agriculture and Cooperatives Ministry with its rain-making operations.

Air force chief Itthaporn Subhawong yesterday said the air force had given the jets to His Majesty the King last September and this year was the first time they would support rain-making operations.


Air Force officers show off an Alpha Jet shortly after the planes arrived in Thailand.



The two German-made fighters are equipped with cold cloud-making instruments and use silver iodide bullets to release rain-making substances at an altitude of 20,000 feet.

ACM Itthaporn said the air force had also developed hygroscopic flare dispensers to make rain from warm clouds. The instruments have been mounted on its AU-23 Peacemaker aircraft.

Last year, the air force operated 618 flights _ 770 flight hours _ of rain-making, which used nearly 900 tonnes of chemicals. This year's operations began last Tuesday and the aircraft were first deployed in Ubon Ratchathani province. The rain-making success rate is 85% to 95%.

The air force has deployed 400 crew and 15 aircraft in the operation: four BT-67 and three NOMAD transport planes, six AU-23 fighter planes and the two Alpha Jets from Wing 23 in Udon Thani.

The rain-making stations are in Lop Buri, Ubon Ratchathani, Surat Thai and Chiang Mai.

Authorities in Tak, meanwhile, have opened their rain-making centre to try to ease the impact of the drought in nine districts.

Water trucks have been sent to help locals and crews have been assigned to prevent forest fires.

In Phuket, local irrigation chief Supinyo Hoonpadungchai said reservoirs held enough water to serve the tourist island even if it did not rain until May.

About the author

Writer: POST REPORTERS

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Somboon

    Discussion 9 : 20/03/2009 at 02:55 AM9

    Who will stop the (Purple) Rain? Certainly not the guy named Prince. And certainly not the Creedence Clearwater Revival.

    900 tonnes a year of acid rain? Did it reach the ground? How much did it reach? Where did it goes after reaching the ground? Did it get stored? Where did it go after it was stored? Hot Dog (Led Zeppelin), the list goes on and on......

    May be the Rainy Day Woman (Dylan) will do the tricks? But If It Keeps Raining, the Levee Is Going to Break....(Zep).

    It is good to know Thailand spent a large chunk of defense budget on rainmaking using jet fighters.

    Amazing Thailand indeed.

  • Kevin

    Discussion 8 : 19/03/2009 at 09:59 AM8

    Whilst it is laudable of the Air Force to employ otherwise useless bits of equipment, one wonders at the total cost incurred ie depreciation on the fighters' capital cost, the cost of capital (interest), operating costs (jet fuel, pilots' training costs, salaries, maintenance costs, other direct costs such as support staff, etc.) plus the massive absorbed indirect cost of maintaining an Air Force, versus the amount of usable water actually generated (net of run off, ground absorption, dissipation etc.). Wouldn't it be cheaper to buy it and truck it in?

    Further, if this is the use that the airforce has in mind for its jet fighters, how many pipelines and pump stations to pump water from flood areas to drought, could be built for the cost of the Gripen Jet Fighters which the Air Force currently has on order? Not to mention their huge operating costs over the next 10 years as set out above, which will treble due to new type approval, training, and extra costs of familiarisation, etc.

    Just curious to know.

    The Military says it is concerned about the Natiional Interest and National Security. As the biggest threats to the National Interest and Security are flood, drought and the plight of the agricultural sector (which supports the majority of the population), perhaps the Military should consider abandoning all of its mega-purchases for the next 10 years and using those funds to build the pumping stations, pipelines and feeder reservoirs from areas of flood and surplus to areas of drought. Additionally without expensive toys the military would then truly be one with the people. All in the interests of National Security of course. How about it General Anupong?

  • Dr. Charnchai Prasertson

    Discussion 7 : 18/03/2009 at 10:32 PM7

    Wow, I see now where my defense money goes!

    Buying jets for rain making purposes? I thought jets were for defense and fighting. Are there any other less fancy and expensive machines/equipment available for rain making beside the jets?

    900 tonnes of chemical raining down on people. Where did the rain go? Evaporated before reaching the ground?

    May be more jets and officers are needed to make purple rain?

  • Confused

    Discussion 6 : 18/03/2009 at 04:56 PM6

    The rain-making success rate is 85% to 95%.

    Can anybody tell me what this means exactly? How much rainfall is actually produced. And how much of that is really usable. And the cost?

  • Kevin Page

    Discussion 5 : 18/03/2009 at 03:47 PM5

    Whilst it is laudable of the Air Force to employ otherwise useless bits of equipment, one wonders at the total cost incurred ie depreciation on the fighters' capital cost, cost of capital (interest), operating costs (jet fuel, pilots' training costs, salaries, maintenance costs, other direct costs such as support staff, etc.) plus the massive absorbed indirect cost of maintaining an Air Force, versus the amount of usable water generated (net of run off, ground absorption, etc.). Wouldn't it be cheaper to buy it and truck it in?

    Further, if this is the use that the airforce has in mind for its jet fighters, how many desalination plants and pipelines could be built for the cost of the Gripen Jet Fighters which the Air Force currently has on order? Not to mention their operating costs over the next 10 years as set out above, which will treble due to new type approval and extra costs of familiarisation, etc.

    Just curious to know.

  • Paul

    Discussion 4 : 18/03/2009 at 12:58 PM4

    The fuel bills for this must be huge, lucky taxpayers

  • Pamela

    Discussion 3 : 18/03/2009 at 10:58 AM3

    Thailand faces drought every year in summer, flood in rain season. Is is caused from poor management of irrigation or effect of global warming? There is no answer but we can start to save our country ; to stop deforest.

    Who can help us? It's you all!

  • Richard

    Discussion 2 : 18/03/2009 at 10:24 AM2

    This is great. Using fighter jets for rain making!!!! Presumably they installed the rain making gear in the fighters because there is nothing else for the fighters to do. Which begs the question - What about the Gripens that are on order? Going to fit them with rain making gear too? This is so ridiculous even for Thailand. Couldn't happen anywhere else (not with a straight face anyway)

  • Ling Mau

    Discussion 1 : 18/03/2009 at 08:48 AM1

    Seems to be working...

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top