Bangkok Post : Don Mueang's future up in the air

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Don Mueang's future up in the air

By: Amornrat Mahitthirook
Published: 9/01/2009 at 10:07 AM

Don Mueang's role as a commercial airport is likely to end as the Transport Ministry favours using only Suvarnabhumi under its single airport policy to foster Thailand as an aviation centre and tourism hub in Southeast Asia.

Srisuk Chandrangsu, chairman of the panel on tourism and aviation promotion, said the new policy meant Don Mueang could cease operation serving regular commercial flights.

He expected that Suvarnabhumi could become the only airport serving the capital as early as the next quarter or within this year at the latest.

The policy still needs cabinet approval.

Mr Srisuk works under Transport Minister Sopon Zarum, who on Wednesday advocated the plan to use only one airport.

The announcement reverses the policy pursued by previous governments. The government led by Gen Surayud Chulanont declared that Don Mueang would be opened to ease traffic and passenger congestion at Suvarnabhumi.

Subsequent cabinets under primer ministers Samak Sundaravej and Somchai Wongsawat agreed with the policy.

Don Mueang was reopened on March 25, 2007 to relieve congestion after all flights were moved to Suvarnabhumi on Sept 28, 2006.

The reopening of Don Mueang also allowed construction flaws at the new airport to be repaired.

Currently, some Thai Airways International domestic flights and all domestic flights of Nok Air and One-Two-Go operate out of Don Mueang. THAI's main base is still Suvarnabhumi.

Mr Srisuk, a former permanent secretary for transport, dismissed the notion that passenger traffic at Suvarnabhumi had exceeded the airport's capacity to accommodate 45 million people a year.

The figure was calculated from the number of passengers when traffic at Suvarnabhumi reached its peak. The airport could manage passenger traffic better by spreading out the number of flights landing and taking off at the airport from peak hours to other periods, he said.

The three airlines at Don Mueang could move back to Suvarnabhumi without causing overcrowding, he said.

Once all airlines at Don Mueang move back to Suvarnabhumi, Don Mueang would become an aviation maintenance centre and an airport serving chartered flights.

Acting Airports of Thailand president and Suvarnabhumi director Serirat Prasutanond said Suvarnabhumi could serve passengers of the airlines that would move back from Don Mueang.

How fast they moved back would depend on the airlines themselves.

Acting THAI president Narongsak Sangkhapong said the national flag carrier was willing to support Mr Srisuk's plan, adding that the single airport policy would help cut THAI's operation costs.

However, he needed to consult other airline executives about the timeframe for relocation.

But chief executive of Nok Air Patee Sarasin disagreed with the plan, saying the relocation would cost each airline 10 to 20 million baht. The low-cost airline had already borne the relocation cost twice. The first was when it moved from Don Mueang to Suvarnabhumi and the second time was when it moved from Suvarnabhumi back to Don Mueang.

Latest stories in this category:

Keep this article in your social bookmark:


Or you can:    print this    mail this    back to top

Share your thoughts

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • erffre

    Discussion 21 : 27/01/2009 at 04:09 AM21

    close Suvarnabhumi and move it all back to Don Muang at least it all ran smoothly when it was there what other city hub have you got to go to another airport for a internal flight

  • Legal Notice

    Discussion 20 : 11/01/2009 at 12:22 AM20

    I am sorry to see so many of the postings here being so unserious and untruthful. Not to say so hateful, full of vengeance and biased to each other. I think it is ok that we are all having different views on political issues, but we should all respect each others fundamental right to voice our opinions, without the risk of being ridiculed by inferior human beings, like I for instance see wtf , levenfeld and thaiman are doing again and again on these columns.

    If we lose our respect for these basic and fundamental human rights of our fellow human being, we only end up on the same level as the members of the terrorist organisation PAD. As undemocratic, without respect of our opponents convictions and in line, boxed up with and on the same low level as other dictator wanting and liking groups like the Nazi brown shirts and SS, Stalin’s KGB, Mussolini’s black shirts and so on.

    Therefore I think it is great that we have such good people contributing with their support and knowledge to democracy in this channel of public opinion. And the best example is as I see it, the one who write under the name of DREY. A true champion of democracy and I think it is a shame to see that some idiots here try to bully him of writing. SHAME ON YOU!

  • Christopher B. Reznich

    Discussion 19 : 10/01/2009 at 02:37 AM19

    When I think of some of the major airline hubs around the world - London (Gatwick, Heathrow), New York (JFK, La Guardia, Newark), and Chicago (Midway, O'Hare), there is plenty of traffic to support multiple airports. Why not have two airports in Bangkok serving more flights?

  • HonoluluJimmy

    Discussion 18 : 10/01/2009 at 02:07 AM18

    I do like the ease a short trip from "farang/BKK" to Don Muang. Shorter distances within the airport and most certainly there is the Taxi Que. Overall I like having the option. the lounge is fine for Domestic travel and very close to the gte etc. From an Int'l arrivl at SuwannaBoom I'm late at night, take a room and fly to HKT first thing..... Good for me as I p/u bags in HKT etc. Now if I'm in Bangkok I don't need the extra distance etc. The ONLY time I use SuwannaBoom is arriving late while transit to HKT. Other wise I'm happy with dumpy old Don Muang.... I have probably 100 Int'l departures/arrival at DM and at least that for Domestic. Do I understand that the ONLY reason that SuwannaBoom got snipped was pure Politics, Thaksin bashing... I well know that alot of the bull was bull. A Unted Airlines Capt said if the runways were bad they wouldn't land there. In fact UA sent their own experts and looked for them sleves. I arrived SuwannaBoom Oct 15 2006 a mere 3 weeks after opening only to find that the day rooms were full. So I took a self guided tour of the new "Gem of Aviation in Asia" to see that there was lots of workers about at night... Cosmetic Work... However, the big complaints were bogus. Just more Thaksin bashing. There were plenty of services, food, all night booze (not for me) and YES, plenty of Hong Nam's. On that issue people wern't ready for the little green signs that you see all over Thailand! The were a number of help desks open all night and good maps. Plus... I would like to mention chang Massage. I took an Aromafor 2 hours which came with a shower. I was VERY HAPPY with the whole session. So, I will conclude that all the bull about Suwannboom is just that BULL! Now, as to the longer time for domestic SuwannaBoom ..... Cha Cha Farang! Shed the ways of Farangland and become Thai in your heart! Mai Pen Rai... you'll live longer

  • sloth

    Discussion 17 : 09/01/2009 at 09:23 PM17

    skypilot,
    present setup is most inconvenient for anyone with international connection either way.

  • Drey

    Discussion 16 : 09/01/2009 at 08:04 PM16

    Last visit to suvarnabhumi, only 5 imigration counter open, each counter only have 5-6 person in que, It was noon landing.

  • skypilot

    Discussion 15 : 09/01/2009 at 05:47 PM15

    The benefit of Don Muang airport for domestic flights was ideal. Traveling time to and from was shorter and congestion a minimum. I vote to maintain its present status.

  • Drey

    Discussion 14 : 09/01/2009 at 04:06 PM14

    What a mean-spirited thing to say ThaiMan, especially in my case. I never met my parents, as they had a sense of how I would turnout, so they abandoned me early on.

  • toto

    Discussion 13 : 09/01/2009 at 03:21 PM13

    Suvarnabhumi has never been congestionned. When an airport is operating beyond its capacity, you see it easilly: planes are delayed, schedules are changed and so on. This never happend in Suvarnabhumi (i used it often). The military government decided to re-open Don Mueang and forced Thai Airways (after they named one of the top generals at the head of the company)to move partly there because they own the land in Don Muang and AOT had to rent it. So, the closure of Don Muang was a big loss of money for the Air Force. That's also why Don Muang was re-open as an international airport : more money to be paid, even if no actual international flight. This was just gross corruption by the military at the expense of AOT and Thai Airways. (but only Thaksin is supposed to be corrupted in Thailand and the military are so honest...)

  • Thaiman

    Discussion 12 : 09/01/2009 at 03:19 PM12

    Yeah right, Drey..and I'm your daddy!..

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • If you have further comments or want to discuss more, you can create the topic in our forum. Click here