MP amnesty on the table

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

MP amnesty on the table

Banned politicians may receive second chance

  • Published: 21/04/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has brushed aside calls for a cabinet reshuffle but is not ruling out the possibility of pushing for an amnesty for politicians banned from politics.


Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, right, shares a laugh with Deputy Prime Minister Suthep Thaugsuban before attending a meeting at the Democrat party headquarters yesterday. The two were in good spirits after surviving the protests by the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship last week. CHANAT KATANYU

The prime minister has rejected the idea of talks with convicted former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra to end the political impasse, as suggested by leaders of the industrial sector.

Mr Abhisit said he had no intention of changing his cabinet members in the wake of the red shirt riots and complaints from his coalition partners about working with Deputy Prime Minister Korbsak Sabhavasu.

Mr Abhisit stressed that any attempts to bring about national reconciliation must be based on righteousness and the rule of law. Granting amnesty to criminal convicts or those facing criminal charges was out of the question.

"I confirm that I'm ready to talk with anyone who acts in line with the law and does not condone violence," the prime minister said.

The government is ready to look at the possibilities of giving amnesty to politicians who were found guilty of political crimes, he said.

Mr Abhisit said certain controversial issues involving political reform and constitution amendments may be put forward for public hearing.

The joint parliamentary session of the House of Representatives and the Senate will be held on Wednesday and Thursday to discuss ways to end the political conflict.

The political reform plan and the proposed constitution amendments are expected to be raised during the joint session.

The prime minister insisted the government would try to do all it could to arrest other United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship leaders who are on the run from police.

He also stressed the government would lift the state of emergency in Bangkok and surrounding provinces as quickly as possible.

However, People's Alliance for Democracy coordinator Suriyasai Katasila has opposed the constitution rewrite and amnesty proposals.

He said he did not believe the proposals would bring about national reconciliation. They would further stoke the political crisis. An amnesty would cause public mistrust of the government's political reform, which would be seen as nothing but a compromise of interests among politicians, Mr Suriyasai said.

He said the premier might have been pressured by coalition parties to bow to their demands for the constitution amendments and the granting of an amnesty.

Former Thai Rak Thai leader Chaturon Chaisaeng said the prime minister's amnesty proposal was not genuine.

It was meant only to clear the name of leaders of the PAD, not to solve the political problems, Mr Chaturon said.

He said the PAD had violated the law and damaged the country and should not be treated the same way as politicians who were harassed after the military coup of Sept 19, 2006.

Interior Minister Chavarat Charnvirakul denied his Bhumjaithai party had pressured the prime minister to grant an amnesty to the banned politicians.

He said the proposed charter amendment was one way to ease political tensions.

But Deputy Interior Minister Boonjong Wongtrairat, also from Bhumjaithai, said the party disagreed with the amnesty proposal. The party does not support legislation that would only benefit a particular person or a particular group of people.

Government whip chief Chinnaworn Bunyakiat stressed that amnesty must not be granted to those charged with corruption, criminal offences and inciting riots and unrest.

He supported the push for a draft bill on the regulation of public gatherings, saying if enacted, the bill would make it easier for state authorities to handle gatherings without the need to invoke emergency rule.

The government whip will ask political parties to consider and endorse the bill.

Puea Thai MP for Yasothon Peeraphan Palusuk said the party would push for the revival of the 1997 constitution, which was abrogated by the military coup, to replace the present constitution.

All political parties would be asked to hold talks to decide whether to adopt the 1997 constitution in its entirety or only some parts of it.

Mr Peeraphan said Puea Thai had insisted on doing away with some controversial provisions of the present charter which deals with the dissolution of political parties.

About the author

Writer: ANUCHA CHAROENPO

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • David too

    Discussion 10 : 22/04/2009 at 11:28 AM10

    To STRONG THAILAND ,

    Thailand is not Strong and nothing the present generation can do will make it so .
    Do not delude yourself that there is a new breed of politician , squeaky clean "waiting in the wings" ready to step into the shoes of the present MPs .
    Corruption in one form or another is the way of life in Thailand ; power and Money are number One , in politics you can have access to both .

  • paul

    Discussion 9 : 21/04/2009 at 03:58 PM9

    Just to refresh your memory the 2006 coup occurred one and a half months before a regularly scheduled, fully approved national election. We all know who would have won that is why the military stepped in.

  • soveny

    Discussion 8 : 21/04/2009 at 03:36 PM8

    Right Bubba and David too!!

  • Strong Thailand

    Discussion 7 : 21/04/2009 at 12:48 PM7

    Mark!
    Don't do it. If you do, it will be vert shortsighted of you. The coup and the dissolution of parties as well as the banning of politicians was made to keep the croocked politicians out and to give the chance to breed a new class of politicians: sincere, clean, knowledgeable and professional. Now, the guys who would profit from an amnesty, are the guys contrary to you.
    The short sightedness would like in the fact that you would give up the chance of long term perspectives of clean politics in Thailand and the problems you are facing now, the division of the people would arise sooner or later. Also, with crooked politicians back in power (its easy for them, as they rely on their purchasing power), all efforts to get the country moving and competitive in the international arena would just be in vain. What you are trying to do, is to cure a sickness with antibiotics instead of boosting the bodies immune system.
    And should you really push an amnesty through, then, may I say frankly, you could step down right away, as you would have lost you legitimacy.

  • David too

    Discussion 6 : 21/04/2009 at 12:17 PM6

    Righteousness and Rule of Law do not exist in Thailand . Mr Abhisit is deceiving himself and the country by refering to government by rule of law .
    The military Coup of 2006 has brought about this shameful , irreconcileable divide in Thailand .
    A little bit of Amnesty will have little or no effect .
    People say that Thaksin is a bad loser and should accept defeat as others do . He did not lose a democratic general election . Mr Thaksin was deposed by an Illegal military coup . Further , the military having failed in government , have determined to prevent a Thaksin style government being elected or remaining in power . Democreacy is being stongly Opposed ! Corruption is rife in every strata of Thai society , Though it is most seen at the higher levels . Getting rid of Thaksin is not ridding Thailand of Corruption . Abhisit may be seen to be clean , but who knows about those around him . In my view Thaksin has a right to be aggrieved as are his supporters , the democratic majority in Thailand . He is painted as a common criminal in Thailand for contavening a political law that does not exist in any other country . It is laughable that from exile he can make such a mockery of the Thai government . Put him in prison in Thailand and he will govern the country from behind bars . I am not denying that Thaksin may have abused power , as others do , in Thailand , that he may have done some dreadful things , for which he has not be charged or tried in a court of law . If he is gravely at fault , so is Thailand . For all Thaksin's evils , I doubt that there is anybody else in Thailand who could pull Thailand back from the present Abysse .

    If the Thai government wants to create peace and a way forward to a prosperous Thailand , a General Amnesty , even to include Thaksin , PAD and UDD leaders is necessary . There may be conditions attached to Thaksin's amnesty and return to Thailand . The little bit of Amnesty Abhisit is proposing will have little effect .
    At a proposed general election , the same party in a different guise will win again , not the Democrat Party .

  • Bubba

    Discussion 5 : 21/04/2009 at 11:52 AM5

    I read: "The prime minister insisted the government would try to do all it could to arrest other United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship leaders who are on the run from police."

    How can he suggest amnesty for politicians but not the people involved?

    And how can he continue to pursue the red shirt leaders when the PAD leaders are not only still free but in his government? The PAD wreaked far more havoc than the UDD.

    The PAD brought down an elected government.

    The PAD helped a minority party, the democrats (unable to win an election) take power.

    The UDD want to bring back an ELECTED government.

    But the UDD are hunted and persecuted while the PAD are free and basking in a false glory of a false victory.

    Amnesty must extend to all and the cause of all this must absolutely go to those that interfered with the democratic process in September 2006.

    I understand well the military that wants to keep an eye on what happens, and some of their leaders are genuinely concerned about the country, But a democracy can simply not have coups interfering again and again and again.

    Had the September coup of 2006 not happened, new elections would be on agenda about now. And a new election could have shown what the people wanted and how they had appreciated the previous government.

    Patience and waiting would have avoided all the destruction to the economy and loss of human life, not to mention the loss of face in the eyes of the world...

  • Somboon

    Discussion 4 : 21/04/2009 at 11:46 AM4

    "Mai pen rai khon Thai gun aeng," said the prime minister.

    The armnesty would benefit both the PAD (the Yellow crooks) and the rest of the banned politicians(Newin Chidchob and his clan of crooks). Abhisit is not as dumb as I thought, may be he is foolling me.

    If he is serious he should better abolish the idea. If he goes ahead with it, like I have stated several times before---it is a Thai "sun darn!"

  • Darrell

    Discussion 3 : 21/04/2009 at 11:06 AM3

    This would be the biggest mistake he could make giving corrupt politicians amnesty.
    This will only give them another chance to break the law again. They are corrupt and should be banded…. This will also show the rest on the world that Thailand is not sincere about upholding the law and letting bad people get away with crimes…. It will also show that the PM is weak and I believe it will turn and bite him in the long run.

  • NO AMNESTY

    Discussion 2 : 21/04/2009 at 09:58 AM2

    Don't do it PM Abhisit, this would come back to habt you forever.

    These guys broke the law (a very apropriate law) and they should be punished.

    Law for politoians which are flexible and laws for the rest of the population which are not flexible is totally unthinkable.

    Protect the law PM Abhisit, be the statesmen that didn't allow dirty politicians to get their own nasty way.

  • ThaiToo

    Discussion 1 : 21/04/2009 at 08:08 AM1

    If the PM is serious about reconcillation, which he is not, he should start by reading ML Nattakorn Devakula's well written article in today's Post and not give a blanket amnesty which is payback to people like Newin.

    The PM has a golden oppertunity; Thaskin is discredited, the reds don't have a viable leader, just dump Kosit, the albatross around his neck and call a national election. He has made enough friends with his 2000B vote buying with taxpayer money (and you thought Thaskin was smart)and is coming off a good handling of the unrest.

    Now is the time to silence all the critics, hold an election.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top