When the killing hour arrives

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

When the killing hour arrives

On Monday, the first prisoner executions in six years were carried out at Bang Khwang jail. This is the story of the reluctant officials assigned the task

  • Published: 30/08/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

At about 1.30pm on Monday, the heart of the commander of Bang Khwang central prison grew heavy when a message was delivered to him by the Corrections Department.

It was an order from the Prime Minister's Office, requesting the prison proceed with the execution of two prisoners, who at that time were taking in the afternoon air outside their prison dormitory.

After reading the order, Prasert Yusuphap sat in front of an image of the Lord Buddha in his office and started to pray and meditate. ''I'm a Buddhist and I don't want to order the killing of anyone,'' said Mr Prasert.

He and 30 subordinates had to carry out one of the toughest tasks of a corrections official _ taking lives in the name of justice, a grisly duty spelled out in the Corrections Act.

Having been in charge of the prison for eight months, it was the first time Mr Prasert had to oversee executions. The last executions in Thailand were carried out in late 2003 when four prisoners were killed by lethal injection.

EXECUTION ROOM: Inside the chamber

Mr Prasert realised that the death order could possibly lead to chaos in the prison, where inmates serving heavy sentences are often in a fragile state of mind, so he kept the news quiet for a few hours until all prisoners were inside their cells.

At Bang Khwang, 743 inmates out of the the total prison population of 4,163 are facing the death penalty. But this more often than not does not end in execution as they still have legal recourse through the supreme and appeals courts. A total of 112 have had their cases finalised by the courts. Of those, 35 have lodged a petition for an individual Royal Pardon while the remainder are in the process of doing so.

Corrections Department chief Nathee Chitsawang

Bundit Jaroenwanit, 45, and Jirawat Poompreuk, 52, two convicted drug criminals according to prison authorities, were not granted pardons and so the execution order came from the Prime Minister's Office.

At about 4pm Mr Prasert called his men to tell them about the executions. About 15 were assigned to take care of the last-minute business of the two prisoners and the rest were to prepare the execution process.

The toughest job was asking three men to conduct the lethal injections. No one wanted to perform the job, Mr Prasert said.

Unlike execution by shooting, which was replaced by lethal injection in 2003, stopped in late 2001, Mr Prasert said, there is a ''close-up'' moment between the executioner and the prisoner when the drugs are injected into the body. He said as there were no volunteers.

Three guards who normally have routine chores such as watching over prisoners or providing occupational training were given the task.

''They don't want to do this, but someone must. It's our duty and we must perform it,'' said Mr Prasert.

switching life for death.

The three guards headed to the prison's execution room to prepare the injections. Mr Prasert then informed the registration unit to identify the two men to be executed, who were then removed from their cells.

The pair were taken to the Phak Jai Sala (rest pavilion), to be informed about the death order. They signed forms to accept the decision and conducted the business of condemned men, ranging from writing wills to calling loved ones.

When it reached 6 pm, the pair were taken to the execution chamber, where they were given a chance to listen to chanting by a monk, and their last meal.

One hour later they were brought to the actual execution room where first they were injected with sodium thiopental, a barbituate which makes them unconscious, then pancuronium bromide, a muscle relaxant.

The last drug, potassium chloride, stops the heart beating.

''They [the executioners] asked for forgiveness from the two, and after they finished the task I advised them to do merit-making,'' said Mr Prasert, who walked back to his office to again pray for forgiveness in front of the Buddha image.

Lethal injection is regarded as one of the most humane methods of execution, but some human rights advocates, including the Amnesty International, have decried the practice of execution whatever the means used.

Mr Prasert said that personally he did not agree with prisoner executions. He said that there could be flaws in the justice system which could end up with the wrong person being executed.

He said prisoners in Bang Khwang generally suffer enough from long-term sentences, some for life, and those showing remorse should be forgiven.

According to Nathee Chitsawang, the Corrections Department's chief, the department has not proposed any changes to the death penalty as the subject is still open to debate.

He said the department is an implementation body and had to follow directives. It has tried to take care of the officers involved in execution as best it can by providing training as well as extra allowances.

About the author

Writer: Piyaporn Wongruang

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Pointman #2

    Discussion 26 : 06/09/2009 at 05:34 PM26

    I personally believe, I'm as hard-core as anyone, but recently, I turned against the death penalty. After reading the story regarding Todd Willingham, who was from the U.S. State of Texas, I feel the mistakes made in that case were criminal, uncalled for, showed complete ignorance by the prosecutor and everyone involved, to include my own government. I'm a U.S. Citizen and just reading about Todd Willingham, made me angry. Not only did he lose his 3 beautiful children, his wife left him thinking he was a baby killer. Todd Willingham is a guy who I would be proud to walk through danger with. When Todd Willingham wouldn't agree to a life sentence by admititng to authorities he killed his children, which he didnt kill, he was executed. I admire his courage. The death penalty is wrong. I also believe, if you kill an innocent human being, God will deal harshly with you for your sin.

  • TheRightStuff

    Discussion 25 : 06/09/2009 at 11:52 AM25

    Fascinating report that goes to the core of a conflict between religion and state authorities. My sympathies go to the prison commander and his subordinates (as well as the families of the condemened men).
    What this article does omit, though, is why were the executions ordered after a 6 year hiatus? This may be an issue for the usually excellent Sunday edition of the Bangkok Post to pursue.
    Chuck

  • Kevin

    Discussion 24 : 06/09/2009 at 08:16 AM24

    DEATHPENALTYinitsTOTALITY: To stand up for basic human rights (including the right to be punished for a crime without being killed) is NOT at odds with standing up, and alongside, the victims of crime and victims' family members. In fact, there are many family members who speak out against the death penalty, and their "don't kill for me" message is a powerful one, but one that is ignored in death penalty jurisdictions. Carrying out executions as a "normal" part of criminal justice is, to me, no different than carrying out torture in the name of national security: misguided, immoral, a slippery slope, and horrific given the possibility (recently proven as very real) of the wrong person being subjected to the punishment. The deterrent argument is unproven (and, in fact, appears to be disproven, as even you acknowledge). Even if it were an undisputed deterrent, that is hardly justification for institutionalized homicide. Using cattle prods to control misbehaving schoolchildren might be an effective deterrent--but that does not make it thinkable to people of conscience. Your version of "totality" is hardly the totality of the death penalty's anachronistic barbarism...Glad to see this sort of discourse taking place here. The position of the officials quoted in the article are quite poignant and underscore the notion that while there is no perfect solution to crime & punishment, there is a better way than extermination.

  • Bill

    Discussion 23 : 05/09/2009 at 10:00 PM23

    Discussion 13 : 30/08/2009 - DEFTIGER

    You have surely said a mouthful. I think you are German, Germans have startet to abolish the ultimate penalty at a relatively early point.
    (I think we all know why !) We don't have the flawless justice that most countries in Europe have, we should have stopped killing people long before they decided on it.
    If only the corruption in this land would serve as a reason to spare even a criminals life.

  • Chetruto

    Discussion 22 : 31/08/2009 at 01:25 AM22

    From my understanding, Bang Khwang may be worse than death. I must agree with the death penalty when it comes to certain crimes such as a murder of a child, however, until the court system has checks and balances with corruption it shouldn't be enforced.

  • DEATH PENALTY in its TOTALITY

    Discussion 21 : 31/08/2009 at 01:08 AM21

    Many people are quick to condemn capital punishment (i.e. death penalty), BUT avoid seeing the TOTALITY of this issue, such as:

    1) the need for justice & uphold justice (btw justice is impartial & has no emotion attachment, i.e. "do good get good & do bad get bitten")

    2) Law & justice to safeguard the sanity of human behavior by its rules & regulations. Do we want to see fear rein in our society? Honestly, how many of us desire to live in a crime infested districts, towns or cities?

    3) As a DETERRENT to would be criminals. Yes, some may argue that certain studies show otherwise. Can such studies be 100% conclusive? Even if they are 90%, would we want to risk on the unconclusive 10%? Deep down in our hearts, we all know that without rules & punishment, ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE in society. We need not venture into more legal-social debates if we would ask ourselves simple questions... Would we leave our house windows/doors/gates unlocked & wide opened. Why bother to lock them? We all know the reasons why we do all the locking up so religiously. They are all there to help as a deterrent & safeguard our house & home!

    4) Many condemn death penalty, but who is noble enough to come forward to speak up for the victims that suffered horrendously in the hands of the criminals?

    5) Who would come forward to speak up for the victims' LOVED ONES & CLOSE FAMILY MEMBERS who may in some cases suffer even more emotionally, mentally, and also financially at times. (Example, drug pusher & drug addict. The drug addict's life is reined, his employment affected & maybe jobless, steal from family, beat up wife & children, involves in robberies to pay for his addiction, etc.) Often all such sufferings are out of sight to society bystanders!

    6) There is a difference between FORGIVENESS & PARDON, so subtle that many of us fail to see it and often being confused to think they are the same. A victim can FORGIVE the criminal, BUT cannot PARDON the criminal. PARDON deals with the consequenses of the crimes.

    7) Yes, there are instances of miscarriage of justice. Do we allow such rare & unfortunate instances to paralize the justice systems? Instead, death penalty must be viewed & taken very seriously. Some key safeguard features must be built into its implementation to prevent or at least minimize any prospects for miscarriage of justice. For examples, criminals sentenced to death must be accorded the right to appeal vigorously & exhaustively ; no haste in implementing the final execution with a window period (maybe 10 years or longer) to allow for new vital evidence (if in any event) to surface to overrule the death sentence, etc. etc.

    FINALLY, many are quick to condemn death sentence BUT refuse to highlight its PROS and most unwilling to suggest constructive remedies to address its CONS.

  • Juanito

    Discussion 20 : 30/08/2009 at 11:02 PM20

    Agree with "Generation Mai"

    You are completely right describing justice in Thailand.
    It is the dark side of Land of Smile, a real and dirty one.

  • Golfy

    Discussion 19 : 30/08/2009 at 09:28 PM19

    I think it is really hard for those who are responsible for this kind of duty.

  • Sad Farang

    Discussion 18 : 30/08/2009 at 08:49 PM18

    maybe I understood sth wrong: state religion in thailand is?? buddhism right?? lord buddha prayed what:: not to kill right? so we are in a country were the state religion is buddhism and the execute death penalaty as an act of justice...
    hard to belive, more: hard to realize that s reality in thailand.. as I was young man, I stated:
    I'll never go to such states in USA, were death panelty is still in order to the low.. now I find myself in Thailand.. again: chane this inhuman practice Mr. MP ..you got your education and grades in England

  • Robert

    Discussion 17 : 30/08/2009 at 08:00 PM17

    This comment concerns the death penalty in general, not just Thailand. One of the most troubling aspects of this story is that the order came from the Prime Ministers Office. We have the same problem in America; politicians involved in the death penalty process. Raises the frightening possibility of executions being performed on a "bad news day" as a diversion, or the decision being made after someone sticks their finger in the political wind. Again, I'm not accusing this Prime Minister of that, but I am saying that only the judiciary, who do not stand for re-election and are supposed to be above politics should be involved in the process. Also, it is quite considerate of the Thais to label their death chamber in English......I think.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top