Govt scores poorly on economy

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Govt scores poorly on economy

Executives say politics is hurting Kingdom

  • Published: 30/11/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Leading businessmen have given the government an average of 5.3 out of 10 for its performance in tackling economic problems over the past year.

The finding is based on questions asked by the Thai Chamber of Commerce University of about 1,000 members of provincial chambers of commerce who attended a three-day annual meeting in Chiang Mai which ended yesterday.

The respondents were made up of members of the private (85%) and government (15%) sectors.

The results show the government "only narrowly passes the test", said Thanavath Phonvichai, director of the university's economic and business forecast centre.

Business leaders from the central and northeast regions gave the government a 5.6 rating while those from the North rated the government 5.2 and those from the South gave it a 5.1.

Businessmen from the eastern region gave the government just 4, mainly because they were unhappy with its failure to settle a dispute involving investment projects in the Map Ta Phut industrial estate.

Most respondents felt political instability was the major factor hurting the economy, followed by the global economic recession and the rising price of oil and raw materials.

Political unrest was the most urgent issue needing a government solution, although 90% of respondents said they also wanted the government to tackle corruption.

Almost 40% of respondents believed the economy would recover in the first half of next year as a result of government investment projects and increasing farm commodity prices.

The survey also found there were no signs of lay-offs and employment was beginning to rise, Mr Thanavath said.

"Most people in the private sector are worried the economic recovery remains fragile," he said.

"Most respondents have projected Thailand's economic growth at 2% to 3% next year, which is below the government's forecast. This is because of political conflict, the appreciation of the baht and the Dubai World banking crisis."

Most respondents back the Thai Kem Kaeng scheme as a means to stimulate the economy, and the debt refinancing programme to tackle loan sharks.

Chamber chairman Dusit Nontanakorn said the Thai Chamber of Commerce would recommend national economic strategies to the government this week.

The plans are aimed at developing the economy, helping it adapt to global changes and paving the way for the establishment of the Asean Economic Community.

The strategies call for the development of the upper northern region, covering Chiang Mai, Lamphun, Lampang and Mae Hong Son, into a centre of tourism and culture, and a production base to process fruit and vegetable for exports.

The upper northeastern region, covering Udon Thani, Nong Khai, Loei and Nong Bua Lam Phu, would become a commercial, investment, tourism and transport hub for the Mekong subregion.

The lower northeastern provinces, covering Chaiyaphum, Nakhon Ratchasima, Surin and Buri Ram, would be developed into a hub for alternative energy and a base to produce and export silk products and Hom Mali rice.

The upper central region, such as Pathum Thani, Nonthaburi and Ayutthaya, would serve as a base to produce hi-tech industrial products.

The southern border provinces, covering Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, Satun and Songkhla, would be made a base to produce and export halal food and to process rubber.

About the author

columnist
Writer: Phusadee Arunmas
Position: Business Reporter

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Joe America

    Discussion 22 : 01/12/2009 at 12:52 AM22

    I have been telling people for years The name is Thailand not Farangland. If you want to make a small fortune in Thailand, you need to start with a large fortune.
    Siam #17 knows and makes many good points why you should invest somewhere else. Some of the stories I have heard over the years these farang come to Thailand with dreams of getting rich and work so hard like dogs and after they blow the farm they go home broke.
    Thailand is a great place to visit or retire part time but you better be very well connected and a shark if you want to do business.

  • FaranginThai

    Discussion 21 : 30/11/2009 at 06:06 PM21

    Good example of Thai business ethics. We all know about how hard it is to get what you pay for in Thailand, especiall regarding the internet and it´s services.

    Well not it´s official, because here comes the result of testing done by the Thai webmaster Association.

    Lets see:

    "Best ISP in Thailand

    November 30th, 2009 — Internet, Internet Providers


    The test done by Thai webmasters Association shows that Samart is the best internet provider in Thailand. The upload and download speed was about the same all the time. The Thai internet providers have long lived on big promises and little to show for. When you read on the adverting that they should give you for example 2 MB they only provide maybe 1 MB or less.

    TTT or Max net delivered 78 % of of the speed they advertised

    CS loxinfo delivered 69 % of of the speed they advertised

    TOT delivered 68 % of of the speed they advertised

    I-Net delivered 64 % of of the speed they advertised

    CAT delivered 51 % of of the speed they advertised."

  • Siam

    Discussion 20 : 30/11/2009 at 06:01 PM20

    Here is an perfect example, an article in Bangkok Post, of why the Government and Thai business is in serious trouble.

    http://bangkokpost.com/business/aviation/28267/thai-boss-seeks-anti-airasia-alliance

    The Boss of Thai airways talks about the need to gang up on Air-Asia because they are a such a threat to them in business.

    What about Bangkok Air?

    Take a moment to contemplate Bangkok Air’s ownership of the Samui Airport in relation to the incredibly uncompetitive and hi-cost flights to and from Bangkok to Samui, and then further contemplate Bangkok Air’s intricate relationship with the Democrat Party Thailand’s finances and also Bangkok Air’s attempts to establish “a working relationship” with Thai Air, and you have the “Thai Controlled Oligarchic Monopolistic Capitalist Model” in all its glory).

    These are perfect example of how business is done here in Thailand.

  • fair and balanced

    Discussion 19 : 30/11/2009 at 03:15 PM19

    I wonder how Abhisit will spin this story?

    Despite the mounting evidence from outside and inside Thailand, Abhisit continues to insist the country is better shape and the economy is expanding.

    Unfortunately for him and his paymasters, the math just doesn't add up. GDP is falling FACT. Corruption is increasing FACT. The majority of independent surveys suggest the economy is contracting.

    If only the government would spend less time on Taksin and more time fixing the economy (without increasing the national debt) and tackling the rampant corruption, the Democrats may have a chance of actually winning an election........

    As it stands now, PT and it's allies would win a 'landslide'. Probably the reason why the Dems. are delaying the inevitable for as possible.

  • Thai Minority

    Discussion 18 : 30/11/2009 at 02:49 PM18

    Siam of discussion #12.

    Very well said and documented. I undersand also that under Thaksin watch, a new airport was built and many infrastructures were in place and yet the country has good surplus.

    The people responsible for the coup should know all these and yet they still think they are doing the right thing for the country. No way, but what can Thai people do?. We are all considered minority.

  • moonoi

    Discussion 17 : 30/11/2009 at 02:00 PM17

    dear Tony,
    thailand doesn't need at first hand more world-class industry leaders", it needs more world-class industrial workers, scientists, ministers! (as you surely know a "minister" is a servant in latin language - minister - a servant of the people).
    thailand doesn't need more chiefs but more indians.- education for everybody, free universities.

  • Siam

    Discussion 16 : 30/11/2009 at 01:59 PM16

    Those comments are very very close to the truth.

    Everyone who has ever lived in Thailand, let alone tried to do business there, knows that it´s impossible to do well there because of many factors.

    1. Legal system does not protect foreign investment and the law´s are constantly changing and no stability. The legal system ALWAYS work for the Thai´s against the farangs if there is an disagreement that need to be settled. The Thai nominee system is constantly a threat to any foreigner who buy´s anything from a condo to a Villa. It´s a high risk and always under threat.

    2. Corruption and other hidden cost´s are much higher then one could expect in a civilized country. Lack of Political stability and violence is always a threat to your business and your status in the country.

    3. Connection is more important then anyhting else, more then what you sell or do no matter how good it is, because without the right connection you will you are constantly hazard by anyone who can thinks he can benefit from doing so. And there are many of those, including the police and the Thai competition.

    4. Nationalism is rising and the power elite is threatened by foreigners who have opinion and who can beat them in business. But the irony is that at the same time they need us....or more correctly our money in order for them, the elite, to keep their lifestyle.

    The list is endless really. But basically most businesspeople and investors decide not to get involved and invest in Thailand because it´s not worth the hassle and the huge risk.

    Those who do invest in Thailand usually usually don´t know or understand that doing business in Thailand is nothing like doing it in their home country. When they find out they try everything they can to cut their losses and get out ASAP.

    Thailand is a good place to visit and enjoy but NOT a place to invest in og do business because it´s simply not worth...unless your ara Cocke or some huge corporation.

  • wantmymoney

    Discussion 15 : 30/11/2009 at 01:49 PM15

    Abhisit is a classic example of text book economist. Use the formula in your final year assesment and you can never go wrong, that's why my teacher told me and boy did I flank big time. I am looking a Dubai part 2 aka Bangkok Debt Crisis.

  • Tony

    Discussion 14 : 30/11/2009 at 01:18 PM14

    The real problem is trying to force through Globalization and this bogus "ASEAN economic community" that is connected by the hip with the crooks that collapsed the global economy in the first place.

    Trade should be freed up, but local industry and the education that drives it and its development needs to be invested in. Singapore isn't having these problems, Japan doesn't have much to lose from free-trade ... and the reason why is because their education system has produced world-class industry leaders.

  • SK

    Discussion 13 : 30/11/2009 at 01:09 PM13

    These are politicians and not economists. How would they be able to solve the economic problems when they are busy holding on to their powerful seats being the Govt. of Thailand?
    All leading economic indicators simply point out how inexperience this Govt. is. Thailand has the potential of becoming an economic leader in this region but the blame game has put all potential people out of this. This govt. has only been working to put Thaksin away but it seems they have rather made him even more popular now.
    Looking back at the headlines of the major newspapers, one can see there is not a single day Thaksin's name did not appear. This is the indication of what this government is upto. They are simple sitting on the good work done by previous administrations who are abandoned now.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top