Sorayuth's ethics queried after denial | Bangkok Post: news

News > Local News

Sorayuth's ethics queried after denial

Academics and media advocates have demanded ethical accountability from news anchor Sorayuth Suthassanachinda for his "one-sided" televised explanation of the embezzlement ruling against him.

Sarinee Achavanuntakul, a member of a consumer protection sub-committee of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, said Sorayuth used his programme on TV Channel 3 to defend himself in the absence of someone to counter him.

Sorayuth on Friday devoted part of his morning news programme to airing his side of the story in the wake of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) ruling he had embezzled money from state-run media outlet Mcot Plc.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 2 : 24 Sep 2012 at 11.202

    We all know that news coverage is not impartial.I agree it should be but here is anything done to the book.

  • Discussion 1 : 24 Sep 2012 at 09.511

    It is absurd that this man was allowed to talk about personal legal problems on a news programme and present only one side of the story, even if it did involve him. News coverage is supposed to be balanced and impartial, so how could Channel 3 allow this? He should have been removed from the show until the case is resolved.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.