Channel 3 insists Nua Lek 2 was too violent, not political | Bangkok Post: news

News > Local News

Violent content led to ban, Channel 3 says

TV Channel 3 has denied political interference was responsible for its refusal to air the soap opera Nua Mek 2, saying violent content was the reason for the ban instead.

This is the first time the TV station has explained its decision publicly after abruptly ending the broadcast of the series last Friday with three episodes still to go, and replacing the series with a new show.The channel has screened the content of all programmes and its decision to take the soap opera off the air was not politically motivated, said Borisut Buranasamrit, public relations managing director at Channel 3.The station found the content of the controversial drama series to be too violent, leading to the decision to take it off the air, he said.He insisted the cancellation of the show had nothing to do with politics. "The station has not received any orders from any politicians," Mr Borisut said.Channel 3 is ready to explain its decision to the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), he said.Mr Borisut said Channel 3 would not post the series on YouTube nor sell it in the form of VCDs.The station's action drew heavy criticism from many viewers, who allege that political interference was the reason behind the cancellation of the show.NBTC commissioner Supinya Klangnarong said the agency has full authority to make a decision on whether the series breached Section 37 of the Broadcast and Telecommunications Operations Act.Section 37 bars broadcast content that seeks to overthrow the constitutional monarchy, threatens national security or morality, constitutes profanity or harms people's mental or physical health. "Please give the [banned] tape to us. We will consider whether it has violated the law," Ms Supinya said at a seminar on the issue which was organised by Chulalongkorn University's Communication Arts Faculty."If not, the channel can broadcast it. Personally, I dont think that the drama violates Section 37....

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 3 : 09 Jan 2013 at 06.243

    "Section 37 bars broadcast content that ......harms people's mental or physical health"

    I should think that the inane content of most Thai TV programs harms people's mental health.

  • ggh

    ThailandPost : 680

    Send message

    Discussion 2 : 09 Jan 2013 at 04.312

    I could understand all the hype if the self-censorship had something to do with national security or something comparatively critical to Thailand. But a soap opera receiving all this attention, quite ridiculous if you ask me. If it doesn't have to do with corruption or how bad the government is performing it’s duties, I guess the media really doesn't have anything better to report on.

  • Discussion 1 : 09 Jan 2013 at 01.121

    "Self-censorship means the media has decided to bow its head to political power" - Not necessarily. There are many reasons for self-censorship - perhaps CH3 didn't want to possibly make some viewers or advertisers angry. Or perhaps there still exists some fiber of morality in those making decisions at CH3 that there is a line that shouldn't be crossed when it comes to violence. I can hope.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.