Bangkok election gets dirty | Bangkok Post: news

News > Local News

Rival parties swap threats of legal action

The Bangkok governor race has turned ugly with the two main parties exchanging legal threats.

Pheu Thai Party spokesman Prompong Nopparit said he would discuss with party lawyers a possible petition to the Election Commission (EC) seeking the prosecution of Democrat Party list MP Watchara Phetthong for mudslinging against Pheu Thai candidate Pongsapat Pongcharoen.

Mr Watchara had asked the House committee on police affairs to probe a 10-billion-baht vehicle lease contract of the Royal Thai Police Office (RTPO) which Pol Gen Pongsapat signed while he was deputy national police chief.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 15 : 08 Feb 2013 at 07.2615

    Say no to the military !

  • Discussion 14 : 07 Feb 2013 at 20.2814

    Boontong; your denial of the red thugs burning and terrorizing Bangkok is as immoral and a big LIE as denying the holocaust or the killing fields of the Khmer Rouge....You ought to be ashamed on yourself...unless you are living on another planet where 36 buildings start burning by the heat of the sun...LOL and LOL

  • Discussion 13 : 07 Feb 2013 at 19.5813

    Someone needs to cut down on the daily doses of Truth Today/Voice of Thaksin.

  • Discussion 12 : 07 Feb 2013 at 19.4412

    Disc 11 Boontong " There is still no conclusive evidence that Redshirt/UDD burnt BKK"
    There is HEAPS of evidence showing UDD and Red Shirts burning Bangkok. There have been verdicts proving it.

    The problem is, people like you won't look for it. There are videos on Youtube. There are thousands of photos. There are days of speeches of UDD leaders outlining their plans (which then came to fruition). If you had any intention of being impartial, you'd Google it. But you've already decided to cling to the ridiculous notion that someone else carried out UDD's plans for them.

  • Discussion 11 : 07 Feb 2013 at 17.5311

    bkksim # 8 - You are absolutely right. There is no conclusive evidence that Redshirt/UDD Did not burnt BKK. Therefore, at the moment, the use and/or referring it is scandalous and defamatory.

  • Discussion 10 : 07 Feb 2013 at 17.1910

    .

    I still do not believe those who ;

    1. Burnt Bangkok
    2. Worsen Bangkok traffic
    3. Bullied citizen while wearing uniform

    Will the above please stand up ! Thank you !



    .

  • Discussion 9 : 07 Feb 2013 at 11.169

    He who is speculating a defeat carries chip on the shoulder. Pot calling the kettle black! I will not vote for a party whose campaign strategy is to attack an opponent instead of talking on how to improve the country. " those who pull up the past, never build the future"

  • Discussion 8 : 07 Feb 2013 at 08.598

    Boontong " There is still no conclusive evidence that Redshirt/UDD burnt BKK."
    More importantly there is no conclusive evidence that Redshirt/UDD Did not burnt BKK.

  • Discussion 7 : 07 Feb 2013 at 08.047

    Worse than school kids "I am going to tell on you"!

  • Discussion 6 : 07 Feb 2013 at 08.036

    OldThaiHand #4 - I wrote yesterday that the game has just begun. There is still no conclusive evidence that Redshirt/UDD burnt BKK. The same tactic that the DEM used during GE did not help them to win more BKK seats. In fact, MR Sukhumbhand Paribatra said after the result that if it was not the BMA, the DEM would have had lost even more seats - you tell me what that meant. How about having a backdrop of AV killing peaceful demonstrators and draft dodging?

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.