Santika shareholder says sorry

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

Santika shareholder says sorry

Two charges to be laid against pub owner

  • Published: 5/01/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Major shareholder of the Santika pub Wisuk Setsawat yesterday reported to police to testify about the New Year pub fire, as authorities prepared to press two charges against his managing director.

Wisuk: Questioned by police as a witness

Four days after the blaze, Mr Wisuk, accompanied by his lawyer, met deputy police chief Jongrak Chuthanont and investigators at Thong Lor police station.

Pol Gen Jongrak said Mr Wisuk was questioned as a witness, not a suspect.

But police will file charges against Suriya Ritrabue, the managing director of White & Brothers (2003) Co, who is the registered owner of the pub.

The charges are recklessly causing other people's death, and allowing revellers younger than 20 to enter his entertainment venue.

The  death toll from the blaze rose again to 64 on Sunday night. The badly burned 25-year-old Japanese man Keiichi Wada died of his injuries despite the efforts of Chulalongkorn Hospital doctors to save him.

Police are still investigating the exact cause of the New Year's fire. They believe it could have been caused by either stage effects, or fireworks lit by a customer.

If the fire was caused by stage effects, musicians or the production team would be held responsible. If it was caused by fireworks, police would take legal action against the customer.

Regardless, owners of the pub could not avoid a charge of allowing underaged revellers to enter the venue, said Pol Gen Jongrak.

After testifying to police, Mr Wisuk, in tears, said he was deeply sorry for the tragedy. He apologised to relatives of those who died or were injured.

His lawyer, Poolsak Pongcharoen, said 31 shareholders of the pub had pooled resources to raise a two-million-baht fund for helping the injured and families of the dead.

So far, they had handed out 20,000 baht in cash assistance to 11 families of dead victims, and 10,000 baht in cash to two injured victims, said Mr Poolsak.

Mr Wisuk was criticised by some victims' relatives for disappearing after the fire.

The father of one dead victim called on police to quickly identify the people responsible.

Saksit Thienthong, a cultural expert from the Culture Ministry and father of Wirachat, who has succumbed to injuries from the fire, said he had just paid 100,000 baht for his daughter's medical bills and signed a letter to recognise his debt, at Bangkok hospital where his daughter was pronounced dead, worth 390,000 baht.

Some victims' relatives have also petitioned the Lawyers Council, asking it to help them take legal action against the pub operators.

At the Santika pub, scientific crime detection officers and Bangkok Metropolitan Administration staff pumped water out of the basement to search for more bodies of fire victims and valuables.

Chatree Charoenchiwakul, chief of the Public Health Ministry's Narenthorn emergency centre, said the death toll from the Santika fire rose to 63 yesterday.

The latest dead victim was identified as Songpol Potha.

The Singapore Foreign Ministry confirmed that three Singaporeans died in the fire, according to AFP. Thai authorities identified the bodies of Lu Weiye and Leslie Yeo, the ministry said.

The men were unaccounted for after the blaze. A third Singaporean, Teo Sze Siong, also died and two others were hurt. Dr Chatree said 73 people injured in the fire were still in hospital. Eighteen of them are foreigners.

Among those in hospitals, 32 survive with the help of respiratory systems, according to Dr Chatree. The ministry had also set up teams of psychiatrists to look after relatives who wanted help with grief or distress.

About the author

Writer: POST REPORTERS

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Thaksin is back

    Discussion 50 : 08/01/2009 at 12:31 AM50

    Well you just have to say and look how you are going to be able to run away from responsiblity to be a "Santika was registered only as a night-time food shop and the licence required it to close at midnight."".

    From Skynews;
    "Deputy Commissioner General Jongrak Juthanon of the Royal Thai Police claimed the force had refused to allow Santika to open in 2004.

    "We found it did not confirm to standards," he said.

    However, the venue threw open its doors after launching a legal appeal that would spend four years in the court system.

    The Bangkok Post newspaper, claiming a source in the city's metropolitan police, said Santika was registered only as a night-time food shop and the licence required it to close at midnight."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzahVMDBXkY

  • Jomtien Mick

    Discussion 49 : 06/01/2009 at 08:20 PM49

    To Aron and Front Line, my hat is off to you guys. I live in Jomtien, so I could have been no help. But I am sure in a time of crisis I would not have been able to perform as admiradbly as you two did. I have not seen much footage, so I don't recognise either of you. But I don't need to.
    I know in my heart that Thailand has 2 heros, at least. I hope one day you can both sleep well knowing you did the best that you could.
    Chok Dee Kup for the rest of your lifes, you both deserve it.

  • for frontline

    Discussion 48 : 06/01/2009 at 12:20 PM48

    Aron Derms on face book front line ill confirm you, I know who you are your face will be in my head for ever

  • On The Frontline

    Discussion 47 : 06/01/2009 at 03:38 AM47

    Aron

    My friend you are one of the bravest souls i saw that night, I am the other big bald guy with the bloodstained white shirt on.

    You will remember me as I pushed that damn camera man out of the way and down the steps when we got the one girl out that we dragged across the threshold. You will also remember me as we couldnt get both of us to the window I grabbed hold of your hips and we pulled the people out as best we could.

    I have no idea how to get in touch with you through this but I would like to shake your hand as you and I know what happened and I would also like to ensure the tall policeman who was with us is recognised as well.

    I dont think it is wise to post email addresses here but maybe the Bangkok Post administrator can put us in touch.

    Take care my friend

  • Aron Dermer

    Discussion 46 : 06/01/2009 at 01:03 AM46

    Who ever on the front line is, I would love to meet with you and talk with you about our experince, I 2 was on the front line I was the tall white baled headed guy with no shirt on, you would no who I am because I never left that front door and I kicked in that window and caried out alot of people and saw alot of people die within feet of me, I cant sleep cant stop thinking about it and for me the fire is still burning.
    And yes we could of helped more if more people werent to busy taking out the there camara phones alot of people died that could of been saved if there was more man power in those first 5 minutes . now we have to live with it forever and there families are destroyed because not everybody would step up and do there part and for the camera guy who was on my shoulder that i never knew FUCK YOU

  • john k lindgren

    Discussion 45 : 05/01/2009 at 11:55 PM45

    Panta Rei

  • Alex

    Discussion 44 : 05/01/2009 at 10:47 PM44

    Yes David.
    They made 2 million in only a few days. Believe me they can afford to pay 2 million to each victims family. But they will not. They have better places to spend money!!! To save them from the charges !!!
    People die when greed and corruption comes together.

  • Kaweeka

    Discussion 43 : 05/01/2009 at 10:32 PM43

    Frontline: Thanks for the reply. I really appreciate your position and the way I wrote my original comment was not really trying to get you to explain all those issues, but it was my way of making sure that the issues at hand are kept in the forefront.

    As you pointed out, the problem is endemic to the society in general. As long as we have a system that condones corruption, or accepts it as just another one of human evils, society will not flourish enough to were citizen display sufficient concern to demand true changes.

    Citizens in any society need to learn to expect more from their local and national governments, and that can only be done through a culture that allows criticism, has less tolerance for the status quo and moves aggressively to punish misdeeds, especially by those in government. The middle class, the elites and the royalist should stop wasting so much time blaming all things on Thaksin when the real problems of its society are at their door step. These people created the class society that teaches the privileged that they can buy anything and do anything as long as they can afford the price, with the less fortunate people having to resort to corruption and crime in order to get anywhere.

    While we are at it, I would like to get away from the term "tea money" because I feel it minimizes the true terms and size of the rampant corruption that exists within the police force. We aren't talking about a few baht here and there, that being left for the low end traffic cops, but MILLION and MILLIONS of baht that flow down these dirty hands.

    The problem is so endemic that everybody just treats it as if it is a fact of life, where the media and the press are afraid of even touching on the subject - as the price to pay would be swift and brutal for anybody putting their real name to any investigative report. The justice system is in shambles, and this can be seen in every day life.

    In fact, the media facilitates this crooks to go on with their business as usual, reporting every lie the say as facts, with no questions. I cannot imagine any reputable paper in the west just sitting on something as explosive as a business that is frequented by the police not having a proper permit for 4 years. That stuff just doesn't go by as if it was a jaywalking infraction - but here it does. They don't care to question the BMA for their lack of safety measures, nobody is investigating to see how many other establishments might have the same issues - which is essentially ALL OF THEM.

    Just empty promises of this and that other thing, but within a couple of weeks relegated to yet another story that never got anywhere. The average non-thinker will just blame all this on bad Karma and other nonsense like that.

  • On The Frontline

    Discussion 42 : 05/01/2009 at 08:50 PM42

    I am sorry if it sounds like any sort of justification, that is not what I am trying to portray in my summing up of the events as they actually happened.

    All I am trying to do is ensure that the facts as I saw them on the night were handled and for some closure for my own purposes.

    I completely agree with your summing up of the Thai "situation" and yes I have been there on many occasions when the police have entered for their own purposes.

    My intention has not, nor will it be, to justify the lack of emergency procedures. I think that the summing up of those will be a matter of public record fairly swiftly and there will be several "scapegoats" put to the wall for it.

    I actually agree that the local authorities are as much to blame for the blatant disregard of safety as anyone else involved in this tragedy. We all know that to remain open there must have been deals upon deals and everyone taking their "tea money". This is the point I am making here, it is endemic to Thai society and actually systematic to the day to day operations of entertainment venues.

    My goal is not to justify your questions Kaweeka, some of them can only be answered by the owners and the authorities (which I am guessing, especially on the police front, will absolve them of any blame - even though we all know they "protect" us), that was never my intention, all I am putting here is the actual facts of the tragedy itself.

    There is no absolution for anyone from what I have wrote only the actual facts of the evening itself. Only the authorities and God (if you believe in one) can do that

  • Kaweeka

    Discussion 41 : 05/01/2009 at 08:22 PM41

    Frontline:

    While I appreciate your recollection and you are to be commended for your heroic efforts and success in saving several lives - and while you have done a good job at explaining this sensless tragedy with first hand experience, you did not answer some of the most fundamental issues at hand, nor are you applying sufficient critical thinking to some of the issues you discuss:

    a) Why was Zantika running without a proper permit - 4 years and going?

    b) Why was Zantika allowed to operate past midnight, if the original registration request defined that this place should close by midnight?

    c) Why did Zantika allowed 1,000 people to be inside of a building that probably can not properly handle half that many?

    d) You claim that thick black smoke engulfed the whole place within second, making any potential emergency lightning useless. Well, any half-bit fire expert will tell you that proper fire-retardant materials do not behave that way.

    e) So, with that in mind, care to discuss the building permits, inspections and codes that were followed during construction? As owners and managerss of a public place like this the responsibility lies on them. If the construction company needs to be investigated as well, then it should be done. If the building inspector needs to be investigated, so be it.

    f) How much money does Zantika have to pay the police on a daily/weekly/monthly basis to operate?

    g) Where you there in January of 2007 or any other times when the police came in to do their little 'drug raids' just to see how much money they could colelct from customers? I have been there, I have witnessed that corruption first hand.

    h) Was there a fire alarm that would have alerted people in the toilets that something was very wrong just on the other side of the door? Ware there flashign emergency lights at least? I guess you can explain that one as well?

    In short you are trying to build a story in which you portray the owner as a concerned person - and I am sure he is and was extremely concerned for the safety of people at the time - but how concerned was he before this happened to where all of the above issues occurred?

    Now, to go back to the oringal report - 2 million baht fund! WOW, that's a whole 66K USD! dispersed 20K and 10K baht in CASH to some of the victims. Wow, USD 300 and USD 600 respectively. How are they trying to fool?

    31 partners can only come up with 2 million baht - that's probably the amount of money that flows through that place on a single night.

    Now, the truth of the matter, at least for me, is that the owners of Zantika are just the symptom of the rampant corruption in Thai society. Everything is just a bribe away, and as long as people know that this is how things 'WORK' there is never going to be any proper incentive or penalty for the typical owner to do things the right way. As long as politicians, judges, the police, etc, are all looking for their 'edge' to get ahead there is little to nothing that will change this behavior and things will be 'business as usual'.

    This tragedy needs to be remembered and become the catalyst for change - but what are the chances of that? Near nil, and that's a stretch.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top