Bangkok Post : 2008 'a nightmare' for Thai journalists

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Local News

2008 'a nightmare' for Thai journalists

Published: 6/01/2009 at 12:00 AM
Newspaper section: News

The Thai Journalists Association (TJA) says the year 2008 was the most challenging year for mass media professionals as they faced various forms of intimidation from different interest groups.

In its 2008 media situation report made public yesterday, the TJA panel on rights, liberties and media reform dug into the 10 most serious media intimidation cases that occurred last year. They are:

1) The murder of two Matichon reporters. Athiwat Chainuwat, a Nakhon Si Thammarat-based reporter who was gunned down on Aug 1, while Jaruk Rangcharoen, another Matichon reporter based in Suphan Buri province, was shot dead on Sept 27.

2) Unkind words against political reporters from Samak Sundaravej were a daily dose for those hounding him for news when he was the prime minister and leader of the dissolved People Power Party (PPP). For most newsmen covering political issues, Mr Samak was viewed as a prime minister who did not recognise the value and integrity of media professionals in a democratic way.

3) A call from Mr Samak urging journalists to side with the then PPP-led government after anti-government protesters, led by the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD), on Aug 26 laid siege to the state-run NBT television station and later stormed and occupied the Government House.

The call prompted the four media organisations to issue a joint statement urging media professionals to report their news in a straightforward manner without showing any prejudice.

4) Intimidation and physical assaults against journalists covering protest rallies of rival political groups.

5) Renaming of the state-owned Channel 11 to NBT by the Samak government in a bid to make the station look more independent, but in fact serving as a propaganda tool for the government.

6) Street protesters' browbeating of television stations on various occasions. Threats to the NBT, a station that was briefly seized by PAD, the surrounding of the TPBS by the pro-PPP Rak Chiang Mai 51 group, and the ASTV station that was attacked by war weapons.

7) Lawsuits demanding 100 million baht compensation from two columnists of Krungthepturakij newspaper filed by Ek-Chai Distribution System, operator of Tesco Lotus in Thailand. The two columnists facing the 100-million-baht lawsuits are Kamol Kamoltrakul and Nongnart Harnvilai, the newspaper's marketing news editor.

8) Thai Rath newspaper's tragic loss of six staff members in Narathiwat. Chalee Bunsawat, a Narathiwat-based reporter for the newspaper was killed in an insurgent bomb attack. Then, a van carrying 10 members of its newspaper's deep South bureau and heading for Chalee's funeral in Sungai Kolok district crashed and caught fire, killing five of them at the crash scene and seriously injuring five others.

9) Removals of several broadcast programmes. Such removals have become a common practice by political groups taking control of state-owned TV and radio stations. Programmes with content critical of the previous governments were replaced again and again.

10) The banning of the TJA shirts by Government House media officers. Journalists entering the compound were requested not to wear shirts bearing the message "Intimidating Media, Intimidating the People" distributed by the TJA on World Press Freedom day on May 3.

Latest stories in this category:

Keep this article in your social bookmark:


Or you can:    print this    mail this    back to top

Share your thoughts

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Michael

    Discussion 14 : 01/02/2009 at 06:27 AM14

    Sunday the 1st February 2002 06:25 AM

    Dear Bangkok Post online moderator,

    How upon earth could you ever let live - for almost a month's time - such an ill instance of vulgarity as the one released off "those to no manner born" like a thing the well lowliest called "Dan" of the discussion no. 12, 07 Jan. 2009 02:36 AM?

    Kindly view, if you please, the statement which was ill-discharged from this bete noire, and take an immediate action.

    Merci bien.

    Regards,
    Michael, a man who loves Her, Thailand : - )

  • NICK

    Discussion 13 : 07/01/2009 at 08:40 AM13

    Anybody want to invest to create a good english media ??

  • dan

    Discussion 12 : 07/01/2009 at 02:36 AM12

    I hate Thailand. We may all write diatribes stating the reasons, but the fact remains. This country is shit.

  • Oh really?

    Discussion 11 : 06/01/2009 at 10:42 PM11

    Why wasn't there an article like this during the military puppet regime in 2006-07? Was there ever objective reporting during then? Before or after?
    By the way ASTV is not a media. It's more like a hate-filled, propaganda-packed shows of the establishment. Everybody knows that.

  • Ronnald

    Discussion 10 : 06/01/2009 at 01:35 PM10

    How you even think about calling this a press? All journalists are under pressure from those that hire them and pay their salaries. And those are almost always siding with the most conservative elements in any society.

    In Thailand no real political or social analysis is possible because of the les majeste laws. It is as if the entire nation pretends everything continues to exist and has nothing to do with the royal family and those close to it.

    You do not have to be anti-royalist to be against the les majeste laws hindering a free press.

    As long as the draconian les majeste laws exist all news will be one-sided and superficial.

    Long live the king.....

    He is loved enough not to need to depend on these archaic laws.

  • Boon

    Discussion 9 : 06/01/2009 at 12:50 PM9

    The issuing of TJA 2008 media situation report on rights, liberties and media reform that dug into the 10 most serious media intimidation cases were just another proof that TJA is controlled by people who decide the agenda for TJA.

    TJA is his report made an accusation that Mr Samak was viewed as a prime minister who did not recognise the value and integrity of media professionals in a democratic way. This is defamatory. Samak has his constitutional right and he was trying to focus on the Country not politic. The onus is for TJA to prove those accusation or else they should stay neutral. Apparently they are not here.

    The TJA twisted the truth that Mr Samak urged journalists to side with the then PPP-led government after anti-government protesters, led by the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD), on Aug 26 laid siege to the state-run NBT television station and later stormed and occupied the Government House. Samak was simply saying to the press to report the Government side of the story IN FULL AND IN STRAIGHTFORWARD MANNER WITHOUT SHOWING ANY PREJUDICE.

    When the press make public news related to either individual or organisation, the individual or organisation haS the constitutional right to rebut. Refusal of rebuttal is arrogant and the alternate recourse is through civil lawsuits. The so-called journalists in the Kingdom, are to me propagandists for peoples who controlled them, they are the self-important phonies in the journalism profession.

    TJA mention only the Government that ‘banned’ TJA shirts bearing slogan "Intimidating Media, Intimidating the People" while not mentioning PAD’s attacked on journalists who wore similar type of slogan.

    ASTV remain the most one-sided media and yet the TJA did not mention anything about the way ASTV conducted their news reporting. ASTV has been propagating what I call a ‘politician ethnic cleansing’ or ‘politician genocide’ on politicians of TRT who were popular and well loved by the people. The ASTV has aCTED on behalf of hidden individuals.

    The above are just a few proofs that the TJA is not independent. We need a ‘watchdog’ to scrutinize the TJA. An alternate Journalist Association is my suggestion.



  • John

    Discussion 8 : 06/01/2009 at 12:23 PM8

    When it comes to politics, Thai journalists get what they deserve. They don't have principals or morals. They're also useless at analysis.

    I was chatting with a room of journalists at the time that the PAD member died on Oct07th and I mentioned that one red shirt had already been killed by the PAD and they all said no. Nobody could remember that an old man was killed by the PAD at the end of August. They swore PAD hadn't killed anyone...

    We need a bit more analysis, and unbiased reporting. If you want to make it biased then back it up with facts and intelligence. Readers will respect this regardless of their views.

  • PROMMA

    Discussion 7 : 06/01/2009 at 11:09 AM7

    Member of the media,
    PLEASE remember.......you report the facts, let the people decide what is right and wrong.

  • Pridi's Ghost

    Discussion 6 : 06/01/2009 at 10:27 AM6

    The TJA is a sick joke of a media organization.

    These so-called journalists, more like shameless propagandists, are the biggest bunch of self-important phonies in the journalism profession.

    Nobody trusts Thai journalists. They are a disgrace to the profession.

    They either just regurgitate quotes from the puuyaai without question and fact checking or they write worthless opinion pieces based on sick fantasies which are clouded by their hatred for Thaksin.

    The Thai media is mostly controlled by the Bangkok Chinese elite, who think they are the smartest people on the planet(you can stop laughing now), even though are the group most responsible for sending Thailand straight into the toilet. They are always bleating on about Democracy, but when the tanks roll into Bangkok, they are the first to goosestep behind the generals, or it shamelessly propagates for a fascist movement like the PAD.

    Further, the Thai media thinks it is on the cutting edge of democratic development, but these worthless phonies are cowards who are afraid of going after important people in the military, the bureaucracy and corporate Thailand. However, we should acknowledge the handful of brave souls who risk their lives while most of their colleagues sit at their air conditioned desks pontificating about Thaksin conspiracy theories.

    Even with the Santika fire still smoldering, do you think the BP will ever do an expose on fire safety, building codes, and corruption in Bangkok?
    We all the know the answer to that.

  • Not_Amused

    Discussion 5 : 06/01/2009 at 10:07 AM5

    I've said it before, but it's worth saying again. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press (which includes all media forms)are the two most effective means of assuring all the people's freedoms are protected.

    Your opinions as posted for the world to see, whether they be pro or con toward the BP journalists or a particular political group is proof enough that the Bangkok Post is unbiased and is not selective in deciding who's opinion to print.

    However, publishing an individual's opinion, commentary or an analysis of a situation is quite different than reporting a news event. Political influence and intimidation have been and continue to be serious obsticles to the Thai press corps in obtaining critical information needed to keep the public accurately informed about government and politics. So, the bottom line is this; Government censureship of the news media in any degree is just as unacceptable to a free society as the inuendos that harm a person's character and the irresponsible and false statements made by a government owned/controled/operated media outlet. This is not the way a democracy works.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • If you have further comments or want to discuss more, you can create the topic in our forum. Click here