Standing his ground | Bangkok Post: news

News > Politics

Standing his ground

An architect behind the rice pledging scheme defends the programme, insisting losses should be on a par with what the previous government spent, writes Parista Yuthamanop

The Pheu Thai Party-led government's rice pledging scheme has faced a barrage of criticism among pundits, who have come up with several versions of calculated losses that will later become public debt.

Rice pledging can be abolished when it is no longer needed and when farmers get the prices they deserve, says Mr Olarn. (Photo by Chanat Katanyu) Other concerns include negative effects on sustainable aids to farmers, oversupply, eroding competitiveness of Thai rice exports, smuggling to take advantage of the scheme and corruption in sales.Some have drawn a comparison with the rice price guarantee of the previous Democrat-led government, which seemed to have the advantage of not having to handle massive rice stockpiles and market interference.But Olarn Chaipravat, an economist and architect of the rice pledging policy, maintains that the pledging programme can serve as a long-lasting farm price-support tool that increases income for farmers.In an interview with the Bangkok Post, he said the government has prepared to sell the rice in big lots this year, which will help repaid short-term loans to finance the scheme."The government would be able to sell more than 2.5 million tonnes of medium-grade 100% and 5% white rice in 2012/13, compared to just 1.4 million tonnes in 2011/12," he said.The amount would be sold at world market price of about US$600 per tonne quoted by US rice exporters in government-to-government (G2G) deals, compared to $450 quoted by other countries such as Vietnam, said Mr Olarn, who is also chairman of the Thai Trade Representative Office.The deals, if they go through, would vindicate the government from accusations that its G2G rice deals are fabricated."We expect import orders for 100% and 5% white rice from new customers in Asia to rise to more than one million tonnes in 2013 from less than 100,000 tonnes in 2012. We have secured the orders. There are more orders coming for Hom Mali as well as 100% and 5% white rice in 2013," Mr Olarn said.Total rice shipments increased 22% year-on-year to about 665,000 tonnes a month from October to November 2012.If the trend continues, Thailand would be able to export 8.5 million tonnes from October 2012 to September 2013 compared to 6.7 million tonnes in 2011/12, a 21% year-on-year increase."The 8.5-million-tonne export volume is close to 8 million tonnes estimated by the US Department of Agriculture in December 2012," he said.While the pledging paddy price at 40% above the previous year level could result in losses, the extent of such losses would depend on many variables including the world price of milled rice and the carrying stocking costs in 2013," Mr Olarn said.The country's rice policy should aim at increasing the supply of higher-quality rice such as Thai Hom Mali premium to serve the changing tastes of more affluent consumers in China and other Asian countries. Their incomes have risen in line with a shift of economic driver to domestic demand from exports.While Thailand has yet to produce enough Thai Hom Mali rice, prospective buyers might opt for good-quality 100% and 5% white rice.Of 30 million tonnes of paddy produced by Thai farmers each year, six million tonnes are Thai Hom Mali rice which Thailand, as the world's largest producer, sets the sustainable and long-term price of $1,100 per tonne.Another 6 million tonnes the country's paddy production are of glutinous variety typically consumed by the Japanese, Thais, and Laotians. When converted into milled product, the glutinous rice normally fetches a market price of about $800 a tonne. The remaining 18 million tonnes of paddy yield medium-quality products such as 100% and 5% white rice, low-quality broken white rice of 25-30% and extremely low-quality rice used as animal feeds."Thai Hom Mali is definitely not an issue in calculating losses from the pledging scheme. We might continue to keep medium-quality white rice until the price meets our target," Mr Olarn said. "He said the decline in Thai rice exports in 2012 did not stem from pledging policy...

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 7 : 03 Jan 2013 at 07.027

    D5 Most of the palm oil comes from the South which oddly enough is the Democrats area which is why the government wants to import it as it will ruin palm oil producers in the South and erode Democrat support.
    As for believeing ANY PTP economist and especially the one behind it all is on a par with me seeing 1,000 pigs all flying in formation.

  • Discussion 6 : 03 Jan 2013 at 06.556

    He speaks fine words, but then we are used to all of the Pheu Thai people doing this. These people have no credibility because of their continuous lack of integrity, so how can one believe this man who has most probably had an instruction from Thaksin to put a brave public face on the rice scheme so as to buy time. What he is saying is totally at odds with what is on the Thai Rice Exporters Association website and what the World Bank is predicting about Thailand's upcoming losses, which is reckons will be 150 billion Baht per harvest. The world is awash with rice. Why would anyone want to buy the world's most expensive rice, i.e. Thai rice?

  • Discussion 5 : 03 Jan 2013 at 04.305

    This is nothing more than an income redistribution scheme from the middle-class professionals to the poor rice farmers, with all kinds of corruption schemes along the way. So, this is a double whammy for the taxpayers. I can't really blame him for doing the same thing that all the previous Govts have done, the difference is in a much bigger scale. So, the losses incurred by the taxpayers will be greater. Well, palm oil price is collapsing because of this Govt purposely flooding the market with imported palm oil, buy why? Why does PTP wants to help rice farmers, while hurting palm oil farmers? At least, be consistent and fair, OK?

  • ggh

    ThailandPost : 697

    Send message

    Discussion 4 : 03 Jan 2013 at 03.554

    To my knowledge, this is the most comprehensive explanation we have heard so far about the rice pledging scheme. Time will certainly tell us if it is beneficial or simply another burden. New milling facilities may be required to deal with the increased rice production. Nothing wrong with building quality infrastructure that will last as opposed to substandard construction.

  • Discussion 3 : 03 Jan 2013 at 01.403

    I hope, think, believe, it could turn out and many IFs.
    Well, he's an economist and even one by PTP's grace.
    Are there real figures published, known by now?

    Something else. Am I alone to get rather bad rice in the little food stalls nowadays?

  • geoffo

    ThailandPost : 2,919

    Send message

    Discussion 2 : 03 Jan 2013 at 01.172

    I saw a new rice mill a month ago. Stainless gate and fencing, paved driveway , stainless silos , a/c at every window, nice cars in the tar sealed car park. Yep , the millers are sure getting the prices the farmers deserved.

  • Discussion 1 : 03 Jan 2013 at 00.331

    "Rice pledging can be abolished when it is no longer needed and when farmers get the prices they deserve,says Mr Olarn".
    So the rice scam is here to stay? Because the reasons farmers don't get a fair price is the politically connected millers and middle-men who cheat them and the chemical/fertilizer companies that raise their prices everytime the rice-prices goes up. These issues have not been addressed. Hence,the farmers will never get what they deserve.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.