UDD will rally until Abhisit calls an election

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » Politics

UDD will rally until Abhisit calls an election

Red-shirts to start gathering on Sunday

  • Published: 26/12/2008 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Anti-government forces yesterday promised to begin a mass rally that would continue until Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva calls a general election.

 

"I do not think it’s necessary to fix the timeframe." PRIME MINISTER ABHISIT VEJJAJIVA

Leaders of the red-clad pro-Thaksin Shinawatra group, the United Front of Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), said they would start their demonstration on Sunday, the day before the government is due to deliver its policy statement to parliament. It would continue until the prime minister dissolved the House.

They said they did not believe Mr Abhisit and his cabinet would run the country honestly.

The UDD leaders and hosts of Truth Today, a political talk show recently removed from state-run television station NBT, said their protest would be peaceful.

Key UDD leader and veteran politician Veera Musikhapong, one of the Truth Today hosts, said the protest would start at Sanam Luang on Sunday about 3pm.

Supporters would show their disapproval of Mr Abhisit.

"Mr Abhisit is not qualified for the job as he avoided military conscription. His behaviour violates the constitution and the UDD cannot trust him to lead the country," Mr Veera said.

Puea Thai MP Jatuporn Promphan, another Truth Today host, said attempts to prevent UDD members in the provinces from joining the protest rally in Bangkok would not be successful.

Natthawut Saikua, a former government spokesman and leading UDD member, said a new strategy had been planned and a House dissolution was the only target.

Mr Natthawut said some UDD members would rally at parliament on Monday, but would not resort to the tactics used by the People's Alliance for Democracy, which seized Government House and both of Bangkok's airports.

Mr Abhisit said yesterday it was far too soon to think about setting a date for a general election.

The government's priorities were to turn the economy around and bring about peace and reconciliation. Only when the job was done would he consider whether to dissolve the House.

"I do not think it is necessary to fix the timeframe," said Mr Abhisit.

When the time was right power would be returned to the people, he said. People needed to be realistic. There were several factors to consider and several pressing matters, including political reform.

He dismissed concerns that conflict within the party over the distribution of cabinet seats could be his government's undoing. The government's stability would depend mainly on its ability to solve the country's problems, Mr Abhisit said.

If the government could not regain the confidence of the public and foreigners, its stability could be at risk.

The prime minister said he had impressed upon his cabinet ministers that they were working against time to achieve those aims and he required a total commitment from them.

He stressed that the government would press ahead with political reform and would bring in people acceptable to all sides to work together on the political reform.

Responding to a warning by social critic Prawase Wasi to beware of adopting the populist policies of the Thaksin government, Mr Abhisit said other countries had also taken necessary measures to jump-start their economy.

Failure to maintain the purchasing power of the people could lead to a severe economic slump, he said.

Dr Prawase warned that embracing Thaksin-style populist policies aimed at helping rural people could be "addictive" without proper management.

Mr Abhisit said urgent measures were needed to ensure people have ready money in their pockets. But disbursements must be controlled with a clear aim to generate returns.

He said his frequent interviews with the foreign press were necessary to clarify the country's situation to the world and win back foreign investor confidence.

Deputy Prime Minister Sanan Kachornprasart was confident the Abhisit administration would remain in power far longer than most people expected.

After the government's policy statement is delivered in parliament, dissident members within coalition parties, particularly the Democrats, could be tamed, he said. He was confident the military would not meddle in politics.

About the author

Writer: Post Reporters and TNA

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Mike Austin

    Discussion 30 : 30/12/2008 at 05:37 PM30

    Having visited Thailand several times i am now in serious doubt as to whether to visit again as there seems to be so much unrest with PAD then UDD i fear it will damage Thailands tourist trade. Thailand is such a beautiful country but now full of unrest. so very sad

  • VETO

    Discussion 29 : 28/12/2008 at 09:02 AM29

    It's called corporate fascism. It's not democracy as you believe. Even Thaksin ruled via corporate fascism. The current corporate leaders in control won't allow any kind of further disruption as we witnessed with the Thaksin/PAD "siamese twins". If UDD-redshirts persist in more Thaksin style unrest, there's always more PAD, and more criminal charges on Thaksin, let alone military and police support. No wonder Thaksin supporters jumped the sinking ship.

  • Ting Tong Farang

    Discussion 28 : 26/12/2008 at 09:58 PM28

    I am one of the "Farangs" who comment on Thai politics, and at the risk of insulting people I tend to understand Thai politics better than most of my Thai friends and family.

    The vast majority of Thai language media continues to be yellow press, at best, and gossip rags at a more realistic assessment. I'm sorry--but the majority of Thais have no clue what is happening in their country, and the majority of Farangs I know (living here--Not tourists) are better informed than our local hosts on local affairs.

    Ting tong, ching ching.

  • Pippo

    Discussion 27 : 26/12/2008 at 06:56 PM27

    Who of sword hurts... of sword perishes.
    This is the result to have allowed the PAD to deal the government the house, to close the parliament and to close the two airports... now how to prevent this group to do the same? Thanks PAD, thanks Mr Abhisit !!!

  • Jim

    Discussion 26 : 26/12/2008 at 06:05 PM26

    Did i read correctly? The UDD is worried about corruption in the government? Isn't that funny considering they support Taksin and his friends?

  • Wladyslaw Ratuszynski

    Discussion 25 : 26/12/2008 at 06:04 PM25

    ...well... it is ok for democrats to block the airports... and stop the county... right?

  • Andre M.

    Discussion 24 : 26/12/2008 at 05:30 PM24

    To keep it all in perspective I post the following:

    Millions of words have been written about democracy, its blessings and its failings but little changes because if Democracy as we all realise by now, is so wonderful. Therefore these straightforward questions must be asked.

    "Why do governments only rarely or never use referendums (referendums are 'democratically' prohibited in Germany) on important matters and allow the majority to make the decisions that affect their lives?"

    "Why is democracy not used in the military system anywhere in the world? We know that the military uses the utmost dictatorial form of control in order to maximise its efficiency. Hence, if democracy does not work in the most efficient form of existence, in the military, why should it work in our daily lives?"

    "Why is democracy never used in the corporate business system, which is the financial engine of the world and especially the democratic system?"

    "Why do businesses of all styles and sizes have bosses running them, and not their employees having a say in the management by using a democratic vote?"

    Test: Ask any voter, in any democratic country, about his or her own democratic system the simple question. "How many seats does your Parliament hold?" and wait for the answer.
    Answer: The vast majority of the population has no idea at all.
    Democracy is a clever scam that persuades the many, that by having a right to vote for who is elected to represent them, that they hold the keys of power. In reality its real purpose is to give the power to the few for the sole benefit of the few. Thus the few have the protection of the many that voted for their elected representative.

    OK, now take a deep breath and contemplate instead of rambling on.

  • C.S. Campbell

    Discussion 23 : 26/12/2008 at 03:15 PM23

    I am one of those farangs living in Thailand. Some of us actually follow Thai politics with great interest because what happens in your politics could effect us also. I watch and listen and keep my views to myself. I do realise that I am a guest here. It's not my right or place to be involved. Just observe. But, please don't consider those of us that are here to be uninformed or stupid tourists. Many of us are very far from that. Not all of us are rich either. Just average people like the rest of you looking for a good life and happiness. Thank You and good luck, and a good New Year, to you all.

  • Sam

    Discussion 22 : 26/12/2008 at 02:49 PM22

    Hmmm, it seems that Thailand has a long way to go before it sees the light... The country is clearly divided and anyone should understand that the big loosers are the thai people; whether they are red, yellow or any color they wish to wear. Meanwhile, thai peopliticians are taking advantage of this division to get into power and fill up their pocket. Don't get me wrong; I don't support any side; I don't have the right to vote so this isn't my democracy. I'm just an observer like all the farangs around.
    The only way to end this musical chair routine, is for the Thai people to re-unite and become seriously and wisely involved in Thai politics. Selecting good leaders has never been an easy task but it is quite obvious that politicians with a dirty history should be kept out of the political scene by the voters themselves without waiting for the justice system to prove them guilty. Politicians honesty and ethics sould be beyond doubt.

  • mickey berry

    Discussion 21 : 26/12/2008 at 02:37 PM21

    I think what Thailand needs,is less uninformed,useless, comments from farongs who realy have no idea of what the Thai people are going thru. I we mind our own buisness and quit trying to but in our dumb comments, the people will be able to get on with fixing the problems. And anyone who thinks Thaksin is good for Thailand, does not see what has been done to this friendly, peacefull country by hie greed.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top