Slower population growth to help environment: UN study

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

News » World

Slower population growth to help environment: UN study

  • Published: 18/11/2009 at 11:03 PM
  • Online news: World

Braking the rise in Earth's population would be a major help in the fight against global warming, according to an unprecedented UN report published on Wednesday that draws a link between demographic pressure and climate change.

Pedestrians cross a busy road in Sydney. Braking the rise in Earth's population would be a major help in the fight against global warming, according to an unprecedented UN report that draws a link between demographic pressure and climate change.

"Slower population growth... would help build social resilience to climate change's impacts and would contribute to a reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions in the future," the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) says.

Its 104-page document emphasises that population policies be driven by support for women, access to family planning, reproductive health and other voluntary measures.

"It really is the first time that a United Nations agency has looked hard at the connections between population and climate change," lead researcher Bob Engelman, vice president for programmes at the green group Worldwatch Institute, told AFP.

"People are at the root of the problem and at the solution of it, and empowerment of women is the key."

The report, the 2009 State of World Population, paints a grim tableau of the peril of climate change and the likely impact on humans, in terms of floods, drought, storms and homelessness.

But it notably puts distance between a decades-long tradition in the UN arena whereby population growth and its part in environmental destruction were rarely -- if ever -- evoked.

"Fear of appearing supportive of population control has until recently held back any mention of 'population' in the climate debate," the document admits.

Things, though, are starting to change. More than three dozen developing countries have already included population issues in national plans on climate, it says.

Negotiators, including the European Union (EU), have tentatively suggested that the question be considered in talks, designed to culminate in Copenhagen next month, for a 192-nation post-2012 global climate pact.

Today, the world's population stands at around 6.8 billion. By mid-century, it will range between 7.959 billion to 10.461 billion, with a mid-estimate of 9.15 billion, according to UN calculations.

The difference between eight billion and nine billion is between one and two billion tonnes of carbon per year, according to research cited in the report.

That would be comparable to savings in emissions by 2050 if all new buildings were constructed to the highest energy-efficiency standards and if two million one-gigawatt wind turbines were built to replace today's coal-fired power plants.

"[P]opulation growth is among the factors influencing total emissions in industrialised as well as developing countries," it says.

"Each person in a population will consume food and require housing, and ideally most will take advantage of transportation, which consumes energy, and may use fuel to heat homes and have access to electricity."

Mitigating population rise would have a double benefit, it says.

It firstly reduces greenhouse-gas output, especially if the decline occurs in developed countries, whose per-capita emissions are up to 10 times those of poor countries.

And it also helps countries -- especially poor nations with high population growth -- adapt to the impacts of climate change.

"The growth of population can contribute to freshwater scarcity or degradation of cropland, which may in turn exacerbate the impacts of climate change," says the report. "So too can climate change make it more difficult for governments to alleviate poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals."

The report says taking demographics into account can help national policies and the quest for a UN climate agreement.

Women are not only more vulnerable than men to the effects of climate change but also hold the key to helping resolve it through fertility control and involvement in the economy, it adds.

Thus helping women will entail access to reproductive health care, education and gender equality.

About the author

columnist
Writer: AFP News agency
Position: Agence France-Presse

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Percy Kelland

    Discussion 1 : 20/11/2009 at 05:01 PM1

    At last a bit of common sense.

    Good to see the link between rising human populations and increasing levels of climate change and environmental degradation being recognised and talked about in a sensible manner. Lets hope this results in positive and urgent action to reduce population growth via voluntary measures as outlined in the article.
    With a proven link between rising economic prosperity and declining fertility rates, the focus should be on increasing the wealth of developing countries and ensuring that this is fairly distributed amongst their people. This can be aided by developed countries trading more fairly and at increased levels with developing nations and with the provision of more assistance, both financial and non financial. Rising prosperity in the developing nations will result in improved medical provision, lower levels of infant mortality, improvements in the provision of family planning services, in the education and empowerment of women and ultimately in falling birth rates.
    With the majority of developed countries’ populations stabilising or (in the absence of net immigration) falling, their role should be to:
    • set an example on population management, by having policies encouraging women to stop at 2 children;
    • have balanced migration policies, which maintain the economic potential of the country whilst permitting sustainable levels of immigration; and
    • Provide both financial and non financial assistance to developing countries.
    With regard to the provision of financial assistance, in the same way that taxes are used within countries to redistribute wealth from the relatively rich to the poorer sections of society, a Planet Enhancement Tax (PET) should be put in place to do this at an international level. The richest nations, starting with the G20 countries, should pay a PET of 1% of GDP which is used to fund projects in developing nations. Based on G20 GDP for 2008, a PET of 1% would raise approximately $500bn per annum. Focusing and spending this money in the right manner would make a significant contribution to improving the planet for all people and life on earth, both now and in the future.
    It’s time we got to grips with this problem and we need to act NOW to avoid an otherwise inevitable catastrophe which will cost hundreds of thousands of lives, bring starvation and misery to millions and cause irreparable damage to the planet, its habitats and biodiversity.
    You can help by:
    1. Leading by example and limiting your own family size to 2 children;
    2. Campaigning to support the policies set out above;
    3. Supporting charities which provide aid and financial assistance to people in developing nations; and
    4. Supporting charities such as the Optimum Population Trust, who campaign for policies to achieve a sustainable population.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top