UDD out to ruin image

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

UDD out to ruin image

  • Published: 11/04/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

The red-shirted protesters of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) brought shame on themselves and the whole country when hundreds of their supporters stormed through the police cordon and besieged the venue of the Asean summit in Pattaya yesterday.

It escapes logic why the red shirts would want to ruin the country's hard-earned reputation and prestige as chair and host of the regional bloc, with their reckless actions. Do they think they can achieve the kind of democracy they are hollering for by shaming the Abhisit government in the eyes of foreign heads of state and government leaders? Do they think Thailand's duties and obligations in ensuring that the summit proceed smoothly and successfully are not theirs to honour as well?

While the red shirts have the legal right to assemble and air their grievances peacefully under our democratic constitution, that permit expired once they took their liberty so far that it trampled on other people's rights. The closure of major streets in Bangkok on Thursday which caused severe traffic jams and essentially kept city people, including patients and doctors at hospitals, trapped was unacceptable.

The brazen breach of the security cordon to get to the summit venue _ to what purpose only the protesters and their leaders know _ risks reducing the mass protest from an altruistic campaign for democracy (as they claim) into a self-serving endeavour with no regard for the national interest.

For the UDD's protest leader in Pattaya, Arismun Pongreungrong, to assert that the protesters ''are civilised'' and that they were not there to disrupt the summit, is plain poppycock. If the protesters were true to their claim _ that they were doing all this for the sake of Thai democracy _ then what was the point of demanding that a representative from one of the 15 countries participating in the meeting _ excluding Thailand _ come out to receive a letter from them? Is the protest not supposed to be a problem between them and the Abhisit government? Also, if they did not plan to disrupt the meeting, why was there the need to break through the barricade and soldier lines until they were directly outside the convention centre?

If they had wanted to tell the world that they did not consider this government as their representative, a peaceful gathering should have been enough.

The summit, which officially started yesterday, brings together the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations along with China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand. It is by all means an important event and a forum in which problems can be solved, agreements forged and relations strengthened _ all for the benefit of both the Thai people and those in the region.

The focus of this summit will be on how best to tackle the global financial crisis which has affected all the countries in the region. But with the red-clad protesters clamouring just outside the foyer of the meeting hall, and with the government's attention divided between the discussions at hand and the need to ensure that the summit proceeds safely and smoothly, that worthy aim could be diminished.

The UDD and its red-shirted supporters have crossed a few lines in this latest leg of their protest, offences for which they must be held accountable.

But with the sanctity of national interest held therein, the Asean summit venue is the one inviolable line which the red shirts cannot be allowed to cross.

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Joey

    Discussion 19 : 11/04/2009 at 12:05 PM19

    When the yellow shirts took over the airport, I hope you wrote the same opinion. This is why elections are supposed to sort these things out. Hold another elections and at least that leader will have the vote of the people.

  • jamstock

    Discussion 18 : 11/04/2009 at 11:56 AM18

    Yes, and the PAD did nothing to tarnish Thailand's image when they occupied the airports.

  • fg Liong

    Discussion 17 : 11/04/2009 at 11:36 AM17

    Doesn't blocking airport have the same impact?

    Come on, be fair Bangkok Post.

    They are all the same, be it red or yellow.

    Government should accept the challenge to go for one more round of election. Let the people decide who they choose.

  • p

    Discussion 16 : 11/04/2009 at 11:33 AM16

    half as bad as the pad..and the bangkokpost was not as much a shame...this is thailand..thai people reation...anyone supriesd...

  • Onlooker

    Discussion 15 : 11/04/2009 at 11:06 AM15

    This is a very good point where you can summon the red. The condition is " So long as you don't take obvious action against the yellow who occupied the internaitonal airport whatever you say would be unrealistic or unreasonable to the red.

    Mr Abhisit has also been doing very well so far, but i opine that he is overconfident in dealing with the protesters. He should be more careful wiht the protest.

    Underestimation and overcofidence is only one step away from total devastation.

  • well done

    Discussion 14 : 11/04/2009 at 10:48 AM14

    well done red. i dont see you critising yellow when they closed down the airport. abhisit is a stooge, if he had convicted the yellow then red and the masses in bangkok and thailand would not have the reason to protest. to say police is still investigating is a joke. TV and press pictures showed they were there. what prove do you need ??? bias against reds cause the country to go down. abhisit should just resign. he cannot run the country this way

  • Mike

    Discussion 13 : 11/04/2009 at 10:32 AM13

    The UDD only continues what the PAD started. The damage level, done by PAD, has yet to be reached.

  • KAweeka

    Discussion 12 : 11/04/2009 at 10:29 AM12

    LOL - was a piece of biased junk! Did I ever read anything even close to this when the PAD was down much worse from these so called editors?

    Go back to journalism school and learn a thing or 20 about how to be a NEWSpaper. All you are is a propaganda machine for the government - I don't need to pay for that.

  • Jenny

    Discussion 11 : 11/04/2009 at 10:04 AM11

    They're just doing exactly what the PAD did. You don't think the PAD absolutely DESTROYED Thailand's image when they took over the airports for almost 2 weeks? The UDD are mild compared to what the PAD did to Thailand's reputation and image.

  • adamitinerant

    Discussion 10 : 11/04/2009 at 09:56 AM10

    "If they had wanted to tell the world that they did not consider this government as their representative, a peaceful gathering should have been enough."

    Yet more consistently partial analysis. Unfortunately, as any social or political campaign veteran will tell you (if you were interested) only two things get mainstream coverage, which is essential to the success of campaigns. The first is money, which the red-shirt campaign has in abundance I'm sure and the second is drama/theatre/spectacle. Pushing and shoving and breaking through police lines, blocking traffic, shouting and carrying on is a spectacle, it gets coverage in mainstream sources even if if some of it is as shallow and dull as this piece.

    Thai people have to decide whether or not they believe in democracy and what democracy means to them. Much of what Thais accept and respect is inherently undemocratic. But if it is electoral democracy the people want then, call a free and fair election and then accept the result. Most observers and participants know who will win a democratic election, rightly or wrongly, which is why the reds are demanding it and the yellows, true to their name, are running from it.

    Of course another option is to say that one doesn't like what democracy delivers and explore the alternantives, but we all know that Thailand has soundly rejected some of those alternatives already.

    Where to now?

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top