Jakrapob, man on a (misguided) mission?

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Jakrapob, man on a (misguided) mission?

  • Published: 6/05/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

The last time I met Jakrapob Penkair was on June 26, 2008. Walking into his office, Malagan Company Limited on Phattanakarn Road, I saw a happy, smiling face greet me. Back then, Mr Jakrapob had just resigned from his post as Prime Minister's Office minister in the Samak government. He had also recently been charged with lese majeste for his speech at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand (FCCT) in August 2007, where he had spoken about democracy and the Thai patronage system.


A garlanded Jakrapob Penkair, with Veera Musikhapong at his side, awaits his turn at the microphone at a UDD gathering earlier this year.

As I interviewed Mr Jakrapob, we exchanged perspectives on politics. He told me that the majority of Thais had a peculiar way of looking at things. If they suspected something, they either accepted it as it was, or moved away from it. But in a democratic society, questions had to be raised. Mr Jakrapob's disagreement with the way Thai politics functioned was essentially his attempt to ask questions.

During the past year, Mr Jakrapob has transformed his abstract questions into concrete measures. He rode on the back of democracy, as he often claimed, in the mission of removing dictatorship from Thai politics. In his mind, he is a true defender of democracy.

But the incident of April 13, 2009 that unfolded the violent side of his campaign under the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), has made some Thais uncomfortable, even worried, about his kind of democracy.

Who really is Jakrapob Penkair?

Mr Jakrapob was born in 1967 into a middle-class family. His upbringing was rather privileged, however. Spending his early education years at Sathit Kaset School and later at the elitist Chulalongkorn University, Mr Jakrapob earned his Master's degree from Johns Hopkins. He once worked at one of Thailand's largest conglomerates, Charoen Pokphand Group (CP), before moving over to the prestigious Foreign Ministry.

He gave up his diplomat job because of his passion for journalism. His coverage of the Apec meeting in Thailand in 2003 attracted the attention of then Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. The latter offered Mr Jakrapob the government spokesperson's post. This was how Thaksin and Mr Jakrapob crossed paths.

Through the years, Mr Jakrapob rose to become one of Thaksin's confidantes. Their relationship could have been forged on a variety of platforms and interests. But Mr Jakrapob made clear that "democracy" was the principle he truly shared with Thaksin. On this ground, Mr Jakrapob was not afraid to take sides.

The military coup of September 2006 called their brand of democracy into question. What Mr Jakrapob has done afterwards is to prove that he still believes in democracy, and that his version of democracy could lead the way for a new Thailand.

His collision with President of the Privy Council, Prem Tinsulanonda, is part of proving his democratic credentials. He revealed at the FCCT that he, with a few others, was planning to set up a government-in-exile in the aftermath of the coup. But the plan collapsed due to intense pressure from extra-constitutional factions.

Mr Jakrapob has never given up, though. He is one of the original founders of the UDD. His mission was clear: toppling the Democrat party's government, getting rid of "dictatorship" and restoring democracy.

Mr Jakrapob told me that Thailand has long been run by khun naang (nobles), and that there is no room for phrai (commoners), supposedly like himself. These khun naang have operated from their ivory towers and never cared to understand the plight of poor farmers. Thaksin became the first leader who opened up political space for the poor and never took their wishes for granted.

It could be that Mr Jakrapob sees a mini-Thaksin in himself. Like Thaksin, Mr Jakrapob is well-educated and highly ambitious. In waging war against the rich Bangkok elites, Mr Jakrapob carefully nurtures his image as an authentic friend of the have-nots, in line with Thaksin's populist campaign designed to empower the grassroots. His self-depiction as a champion of the poor earned him the reputation of being a young leader who is fighting for equality and justice.

But Mr Jakrapob himself lives a comfortable life. He is CEO of an up-and-coming media production house. Some people may question: what is wrong about the rich defending the poor? Argentina's super rich Juan Peron also claimed to work for the have-nots. Mr Jakrapob's political thought has probably been shaped by his exposure to Western ideology during his years in the United States. In fact, his tenure at the Foreign Ministry (known to be run by the aristocracy) could have also moulded his political thinking.

Since the violent clash between the UDD and the security forces last month, Mr Jakrapob has gone into hiding. His periodic interviews with foreign media suggest that the campaign to bring back the so-called Thai democracy is very much ongoing. But his recent statements worry some Thais.

He told the BBC: "I believe the room for unarmed and non-violent means to resolve Thailand's problem is getting smaller every day."

Obviously, he is endorsing an armed struggle against the Thai government.

Is Mr Jakrapob following in the footsteps of past leaders, like those who went underground to destabilise the Japanese occupation of Thailand in the Second World War? Or is he emulating similar tactics used by the Thai Communist Party in its subversion attempt against the Thai state? Whatever the motivation that drives him, Mr Jakrapob's current mission is a zero-sum game. He is now a fugitive from Thai law. He was tainted by his perceived anti-monarchy beliefs. His staunch support for Thaksin fails to cast him in good light, at least in the eyes of the Bangkok elite.

Unless Thailand successfully goes through a revolutionary stage where the tables are turned and Thaksin re-emerges as the true winner in the power struggle, Mr Jakrapob's future looks extremely bleak.

His subversive plan has already been rejected by some UDD members.

As Thailand is heading down the road to reconciliation, Mr Jakrapob's rebellious act may prove counter-productive for Thailand's future.

Mr Jakrapob's last message to me in January this year was that he wished me "all the best in this imperfect world". I honestly wonder if his urge for an armed struggle would really make imperfect Thailand perfect.

  • Dr Pavin Chachavalpongpun is a visiting research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.

About the author

Writer: DR PAVIN CHACHAVALPONGPUN

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Albert Park

    Discussion 22 : 13/06/2009 at 09:41 AM22

    Should Pavin reveal that he works for the government (MFA)?

  • Israphan

    Discussion 21 : 08/05/2009 at 07:27 AM21

    Dr Pavin forgot something. People behave one way or another for a reason. When one is feeling injustice, it is dangerous he or she will do wrongly. Mr Jakrapob is included. He has heart and mind. His self-exciled life is a result of frustration the red-shirted people are being treated. Be fair Thailand. Be fare to everyone serving and loving this country.

  • Metha

    Discussion 20 : 07/05/2009 at 10:28 AM20

    Edward R. Murrow on CBS-TV "See It Now" March 9, 1954 said: "... But we cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home... he didn't create this situation of fear, he merely exploited it, and rather successfully..."

    The paraphrase is:

    We cannot defend democracy externally by deserting it internally... he didn't create this situation of media, he merely exploited it, and rather successfully..."

    Media here-and-now are very much ready "for exploitation" regardless which side you're on. You can pick up easy suspicions such as, say, when Bangkok Post on May 7, 2009 printed an article by Jan-Uwe Ronneburger (of ???) on Evita Peron with "... The self-styled advocate of the 'shirtless' workers herself wore extremely expensive clothes from Paris and extravagant jewelery..." while Dr. Pavin just a day before wrote in the very same newspaper section that "...But Mr Jakrapob himself lives a comfortable life. He is CEO of an up-and-coming media production house. Some people may question: what is wrong about the rich defending the poor? Argentina's super rich Juan Peron also claimed to work for the have-nots..."

    Many of us today are naturally talented in media "arrangement". It's a new branch of the art of journalism that'd surprise Murrow, and excite Dan Rather. The fault may not be with the editor though, sometimes you just get "exploited" expediently, readers or publishers.

    Guess Murrow would have said "Good Coincidence, and Good Luck!"

  • SWS

    Discussion 19 : 07/05/2009 at 05:41 AM19

    There are many Che-wannabe in this world and Jakrapob is one of them.

    In Germany, we have a left wing party leader, Oskar Lafontain, who lead a luxury life but claimed to work for the working class.

    The problem with such idealism is that the world is not ready for such blood-letting revolution. And any kind of change for better redistribution of national wealth will have to come through evolutionary approach and not Cold War era revolutionary act.

    Jakrapob could swallow his false pride and backtrack his firebrand rhetoric and come back to be of service for the poor, or he could choose to live an exiled life, after his stint to become a Che-like revolutionary, which is programmed to be doomed given the unfavourable and illogical circumstances prevailing in today's Thailand.

  • Scott

    Discussion 18 : 07/05/2009 at 02:11 AM18

    What is the purpose of this article? You have not met this man since last year, the last you have heard from him was in January. This appears to be just another opinion piece being put out by the media as news... or else I missed something of relevance in your serman.

  • Independent Thai

    Discussion 17 : 07/05/2009 at 01:46 AM17

    Dr.Pravin;What kind of the doctor are you?What do the research you do?You are like the intelligent man but your faced is in the mud.You can't see the reality of the world.you only see the selfishnees and the benifits for yourself and associates.You don't care their action is unlawful or wrongdoing as long as the results are advantageous to you and your associates.
    What is your definition of democracy?
    What is the corruption,abuse of the power and murder,and greed?Did you see that in Thaksin's government?
    Did you see Mr, Thaksin do every thing for the poor or he want to use the poor for his benifit?
    Wake up Dr.Pravin to see the reality of the life and universe.Intelligence dosen 't lead you to a harmony and peaceful world,you have to develop the wisdom in your heartedmind then you can see the truth of life.

  • Dike

    Discussion 16 : 06/05/2009 at 02:42 PM16

    “Thailand is heading down the road to reconciliation.” Ohh, really? Seems as if it is just another Thai non-solution for social problems; just sweep the dirt under the carpet or a white shirt, and hope it’s vanishing sooner or later. You as a political scientist from SOAS should know better.

  • Fairthought

    Discussion 15 : 06/05/2009 at 02:31 PM15

    I commend the author of this article - well written and with fair analysis.

    Democracy in Thailand won't work unless the Thai voters refused to sell their votes to the "false messiah" who professes to champion the poor and the down-trodden but who is now enjoying the "loot" he stashed away during his years in power.

    Yes, why ride a rickshaw when you can jet set around the world in your own private jet??!!! Is that the true champion of the poor?

  • Supachok Chattanuchai

    Discussion 14 : 06/05/2009 at 02:29 PM14

    Very good article Dr.

  • Michael

    Discussion 13 : 06/05/2009 at 01:48 PM13

    Before April 13 incidence, Jakrapob, with lots of strong backing from the reds and politicians of the opposition party, strongly believe that he can turn the tide against the government. When the situation was not in his favor, he resulted to more hardcore action. Comparing Jakrapob to those experienced politicians like Chalerm, Jakrapob is just a frog in a well. Khun Chalerm knows well that Politics is a strange bedfellow where there is no forever enemy or friend. Khun Chalerm knows how to use people and situation to benefit himself; whereas, Jakrapob has strong pride and refuses to admit his mistake even though some of his words and actions are not acceptable to the Thai culture. Now, he is also alienated by some of the opposition party politicians and red leaders for no one wants to be labeled himself as "I am the one that destroy Thailand."

    I think Jakrapob should now be fully awakened and contemplate on his deed and action. He now should realize that there is no true friend in politics.

    It is still not too late for Jakrapob to swallow his pride and get back to the path of reconcilliation where majority of the Thais want to see peace and prosperity in Thailand.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top