Suu Kyi trial an indication of junta's panic

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Suu Kyi trial an indication of junta's panic

  • Published: 15/05/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

In Burma, things just keep going from bad to worse. Last week, the country's revered democracy leader and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi was taken ill. Her doctor reported she was short of breath, had low blood pressure and needed an intravenous drip.


Burmese citizens living in Japan hold portraits of Aung San Suu Kyi as they protest outside the Burmese embassy in Tokyo yesterday.

That was just before he was detained.

Then there was news of US national John William Yettaw, 53, who swam across Rangoon's Inya Lake to Daw Suu Kyi's house, where he stayed for two nights in her basement.

Now Daw Suu Kyi has been taken to the notorious Insein prison to be tried on clearly trumped up charges.

See also Suu Kyi in court.

This presents an opportunity for the international community to act. To anyone with even a passing notion of Burma's Orwellian political context, this latest development is oddly predictable, even given the surreal circumstances.

To reach an understanding of this awful turn of events, one has only to reach back a few months. In April, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that Aung San Suu Kyi's incarceration was not only in violation of international law, it was in contravention of Burmese law.

Since then it has been incumbent on the Burmese military regime to find a means to justify the continued imprisonment of the country's leading democracy figure. This compulsion became particularly pressing as Daw Suu Kyi's current period of house detention was scheduled to end on May 27.

Desperately reaching for an excuse to put the country's legitimate democracy leader in prison, the regime has cooked up a bizzare scheme to use the uninvited visit of the American and to then apply Article 22 of the State Protection Law, which prohibits any Burmese from accepting a foreign visitor for an overnight stay without state permission.

This is quite apart from the fact that it is the regime which should be on trial for failing to protect someone supposedly under their watch.

The trial looks set to drag on for days yet. It will be behind closed doors, of course, and likely removed from any connection to basic legal due process. This development highlights a number of issues.

For one, it should not be forgotten that Aung San Suu Kyi's fate mirrors that of Burma's many other political prisoners. There are now some 2,100 political prisoners in Burmese prison cells and each and every one has landed there on the back of unfounded charges and hollow legal processes.

Her fate is that of so many in Burma.

The second issue is that Daw Suu Kyi's widely reported health problems have clearly driven the regime to seek ways to take her even further away from scrutiny. This is clearly a dangerous course, but it does at least suggest that the regime is increasingly reactionary and that international pressure to release Daw Suu Kyi is gaining traction.

While we all fear the health consequences should she be imprisoned, we can at least find some motivation in this fact.

A third point highlighted is that this situation is as clear an indication there ever was - if one were needed - that the proposed 2010 national elections are an absolute sham. Finding scant reason to lock up the country's bona fide democracy leader is this regime's obsession, not democracy. This election has zero credibility and zero democratic accountability.

As the regime has seen fit to look to imprison their greatest threat, we can all be emboldened by her spirit and by her fortitude. That she has stayed in Burma to face such threats to her safety and well-being, despite being allowed to leave Burma at any time (so long as she does not return), shows she has chosen a harsh course.

For her, it is the only course, for she must be where her people are.

Over the last months, there has been debate over policy on Burma among the international community. The case of Aung San Suu Kyi underlines that any policy must have at its core a push for the release of all political prisoners and to be driven by the need for a democratic transition to be initiated in Burma immediately.

Moreover, Daw Suu Kyi's arrest offers a firm basis for the continuation of targeted economic sanctions and for ongoing international pressure, as this is an obvious motivator for the regime and is a sign that they fear the opprobrium of global governments and institutions.

The solution to Burma is, and has always been, a combination of carrot and stick.

What we learn from the case of Aung San Suu Kyi, as she awaits her fate in Insein prison, is that there is hope even in disaster and that her sacrifices are at last undermining the regime. Perhaps this appears paradoxical and counter-intuitive, but such is the shape of politics in today's Burma.

The world must not let this moment pass without swift and sure action. It is time for the international community to end Burma's descent into hell and to use Daw Suu Kyi's kangaroo court trial as a base upon which to build greater democracy in our country.

Bo Hla Tint is Foreign Affairs Minister for the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, headquartered in Washington, DC.

About the author

Writer: BO HLA TINT

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • isan farang

    Discussion 15 : 17/05/2009 at 05:21 AM15

    As long as their fellow dictators and financial sponsors in China keep lining the pockets of the junta and using their slaves to plunder the resources nothing, other than violent struggle, will free the people of Burma.Western nations should be rearming the various groups that have been fighting the murdering junta as quickly as possible.The generals "road map to democracy" has too many crooked roads and potholes and any vehicle that takes it is heading for a head on collision.

  • toby

    Discussion 14 : 16/05/2009 at 01:28 PM14

    Since they are ruled by rag team military all the USA has to do is have a general call them and lean on them.

  • dumbwhitey

    Discussion 13 : 15/05/2009 at 11:40 PM13

    Thailand's government and military don't give a damn about their own people's human rights (extra-judicial killings of drug suspects, Tak Bai etc...) so why should they care about Aung San Suu Kyi. They already showed how little they care about anything to do with Burma, besides making telecommunications and hydroelectric business deals, by the way the Thai military treated the Rohingya, and all illegal Burmese immigrants here. Thailand barely has more right to be a member of ASEAN than Burma.

  • m.barriss

    Discussion 12 : 15/05/2009 at 05:17 PM12

    when Burmese monks were trying to free their country, where was the mass support of Thai monks. SHAME! Apparenly they didn't have the stomach for protesting, or speaking out against the non-Buddhist activities of the reds or yellows either. SHAME!!

  • gobi de garuda

    Discussion 11 : 15/05/2009 at 03:20 PM11

    to "boris"
    be careful when you use a figure about others.
    Su Kyi's party only won a little bit over 80% of total votes but not a ridiculous over 90% as the country's junta claimed they did at their last refereundum.

  • supattana

    Discussion 10 : 15/05/2009 at 02:30 PM10

    Asean made the gravest mistake of allowing Myanmar to be a member. Even after signing the Asean Human Rights Charter,Myanmar still continue to violate the rules. Time for Asean leaders to re-consider Myanmar status as a member. Otherwise,it's a joke for Asean to exist.

  • SWS

    Discussion 9 : 15/05/2009 at 02:25 PM9

    Panic stricken might not be the right words, so far as the Burmese junta is concerned. From its point of view, it is only one of the many acts in trying to consolidate and continuation of its power monopoly.

    While the saffron revolution might have pushed the junta out of balance for a period of time, it is now confident enough to jail the most popular democracy icon, without having to fear any hostile reaction from the cowed population.

    It will now take more than peaceful mass demonstration to root out this tyrannical dictatorship.

    But the influential international stakeholders still need to come up with more innovative approach than just muddling through, with rhetoric like "if you can't win them, join them".

    Until real humanitarian concern could triumph over the notion of non-interference and territorial integrity, the people of Burma will continue to suffer under SPDC's tyrannical rule.

  • charlie

    Discussion 8 : 15/05/2009 at 11:57 AM8

    The junta rule Burma with a gun .I hope one day the people of Burma can rise up against the Junta .Its sad to note that since Burma doesnt have anything of benefit to the other countries how nobody is willing to help it free itself .Thailand and China especially .Says a lot about human values doesnt it .

  • Wombat

    Discussion 7 : 15/05/2009 at 11:52 AM7

    My guess is that the international community, including Thailand, will not raise a finger in protest at the latest abuse of this Nobel Peace Prize winner. Hope I'm wrong.

    The fact that she has been abused for nearly 20 years without any meaningful intervention from any other country of organization proves that we just don't care.

    Why are we so afraid of the Burmese military goons?
    Why do we put up with their thuggery?

  • Godon

    Discussion 6 : 15/05/2009 at 11:09 AM6

    Not to worry,China will tell you what to do. They own that part of the world now anyway.Why not?

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top