Bangkok Post : The bright yellow washing detergent

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

The bright yellow washing detergent

  • Published: 1/08/2010 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

If it looks like a Hindu, if it was built by a Khmer and if it has all the characteristics of a Cambodian _ then it must belong to Thailand. But rest assured, the dispute over the 4.6 square kilometre portion of the Preah Vihear temple isn't really about the 4.6 square kilometres.

It isn't even about Preah Vihear itself. Therefore, this commentary will not dwell on who Preah Vihear really belongs to.

Though this must be said, people seems to neglect the fact that another World Heritage site, Vihear Phra Mongkolpitr in Ayutthaya, may be taken off the World Heritage list by Unesco. The reason is because it's so poorly run that it has become more like a weekend market filled with garbage.

And we, Thailand, still have the gall, the audacity, to make claims with the World Heritage Committee.

But this isn't about Preah Vihear or Vihear Phra Mongkolpitr. This is about the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD). This is about the New Politics Party.

This is about the yellow shirts.

In 2005 when the PAD came out in droves and shook the capital city of Bangkok, they managed to bring the poor and elites together.

Covered head-to-toe in sunscreen, high society khunyings put on their Gucci sunglasses and donned yellow silk blouses and flowery hats. Umbrellas in hand, they took to the streets with their prai counterparts.

How was this possible? The PAD's slogans sang to everyone's heartstrings: down with corruption, taking pride in nationalism and - last but not least, in fact, it's definitely the most - protect the royal institution.

It was simple political ingenuity. It was brilliant.

Suddenly, Thaksin Shinawatra making funny faces during an audience with His Majesty the King became a matter of national controversy.

''He made funny faces. He must be a traitor!''

''He made funny faces. He must want to bring down the monarchy and become president!''

Smack it, wrap it and pack it - the people bought it, hook, line and sinker.

If that wasn't enough, there's Preah Vihear - a place most Thais had never even heard of until the PAD mentioned it.

Sovereignty. Pride. Nationalism.

''That traitor is trading our heritage, our land, our history, for a casino in Koh Kong!''

''He's in collusion with a foreign country!''

Oh how that whipped the Thai people into a fury - then and now.

I say then and now, because that is the cow that the PAD will milk until it runs dry. But you see, this cow never runs dry, for her name is ''pride'', ''nationalistic pride''.

Never mind the corruption bit - any old political movement can sing that tune. But nationalism, sovereignty and the royal institution? Now that is some strong detergent for a thorough washing of the brain.

Do not be surprised that the yellow movement, which has been relatively quiet over the past year, is now making plenty of headlines.

They have merely been building their political networks.

Do not be shocked that Major General Chamlong Srimuang can led a political gathering of hundreds of people to the Unesco offices in Bangkok - a city under emergency decree where a political gathering of the red shirts means a police round-up and into the prison they go.

But a political gathering of the yellows? Well, here's a newsflash: the emergency decree has been renamed ''the Emergency Red Only, with Special Exception to His Excellency Chamlong Srimuang the Untouchable Decree''.

Do not even raise an eyebrow that the yellow banners of nationalism, sovereignty and the royal institution are flying again.

After all, they are now the New Politics Party and Bangkok district elections are coming up.

As well, the general election - by all accounts - could be coming as soon as early next year. Not to mention, the Democrat Party might be dissolved by the Constitution Court over alleged illegal donations.

Somebody is licking their chops at filling the vacuum.

On the Preah Vihear issue, if we were to look at the Thai press we would see columns and articles decrying: ''Abhisit is acting too late!''

''The government is losing our sovereignty!''

''Ignorance and lethargy are causing us to lose our national integrity!''

Well, the mind of the media is as easily washed as anyone else's. It is all playing into the hands of the yellow shirts.

Naturally, in the past week the prime minister came out swinging hooks and uppercuts about saving the integrity of 4.6 square kilometres that looks like a Hindu, was built by a Khmer and has all the characteristics of a Cambodian - all of which supposedly stands on Thai soil.

Fortunately for the prime minister, victory to Thai pride was hailed and integrity was safe. We managed to get a delay in the decision because we threatened: ''We're gonna quit and won't play with you guys anymore! Boo hoo!''

At the heart of it, the prime minister didn't have much choice. Failing to act, he may have been branded ''a sell-out'' or even ''a traitor''. No politicians, especially ones in government, can afford that.

Shouting the slogans of pride, nationalism, sovereignty and the royal institution worked out wonderfully for the yellow shirts four years ago in helping to bring down Thaksin Shinawatra. Today, the same slogans will help to expand their political power.

Patriotism is the love of one's country. Nationalism is the vanity of one's country. You see, dear readers, it is not about 4.6 square kilometres. It is not about Preah Vihear.

It's about the yellow shirts. It's about the PAD.

It's about the New Politics Party making its move to win the Thai people's hearts and minds, and hence our votes, by appealing to that basest of society's instincts - nationalism.


Email

: voranaiv@bangkokpost.co.th

Give us your ideas!

What do you want to see at the website? We need your input! We appreciate your suggestions.

Take survey

About the author

columnist
Writer: Voranai Vanijaka
Position: Editor

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • MART

    Discussion 57 : 09/08/2010 at 12:38 AM57

    A lot of criticisms on the PAD which are all relatively true, but I'd like to hear some on the opposite faction.

  • real hindu

    Discussion 56 : 08/08/2010 at 02:38 PM56

    It's a pile of rocks! Real Hindus would kick Unesco out and let nature take its course. Buddha, also, taught impermenance. Why allow Western preservationists to dictate over the religious principals. It's a sacrelege to HOLD on to these sites, anyway. It's forcing Western Concepts; it's meddling.
    World Heritage Siting won't be found in vedas or Buddhist teachings, just the Opposite!

  • Dave Williams

    Discussion 55 : 04/08/2010 at 02:46 PM55

    To Jake Elwood: Hun Sen needs no help in winning an election, my friend, trust me. Hun Sen has got Cambodia and the international community wrapped around his little finger. Thaksin needs him far more than he needs Thaksin.

    On the article -my thoughts entirely. The PAD are the reason it's so "important" to Thais. My advice, focus on your own ailing heritage sites and let Cambodia screw up Preah Vihear on its own.

  • wantmymoney

    Discussion 54 : 03/08/2010 at 09:30 PM54

    Dangerous article, watch out for those yellow or red bullets, you are too good looking to die young. But if young men are not brave, there is no future for him. Now its on to a game of waiting and predictions for Thailand future after the election. Either thailand goes the way of philippines with multiple political killings in the hundreds or the way of Indonesia during Suharto stepping down time, nationalism which strain all foreign relationships. Why do lemers jump off the cliffs in doves? Because its leaders was first to fall off the cliff into the deep ocean below, so beware who you follow.

  • tima9x

    Discussion 53 : 03/08/2010 at 06:46 PM53

    If the people don't know, don't want to know or simply can't find out other possibilities how can Thailand move forward? Which one is it?

  • shuggy

    Discussion 52 : 03/08/2010 at 06:22 PM52

    @Jake Elwood disc50
    Thaksin was not the Prime Minister in 1962. He was not even a politician. Try again.

  • Right

    Discussion 51 : 03/08/2010 at 01:19 PM51

    I agree. It also implies that Thailand is too nationalism and extremed!

  • Jake Elwood

    Discussion 50 : 02/08/2010 at 04:37 PM50

    Very well written piece and it highlights the problems in Thai society (as with other countries), namely extremism.

    One point which was not stressed was that this whole issue came about because Thaksin (through his lackeys) engineered the land hand-over to Cambodia to help Hun Sen win an election so that Thaksin could get favours from him. This is what irks most thinking people, that he was willing to give up Thai sovereignty of a piece of land for personal gain. It's the principle, not just a low-brow nationalism issue.

  • Angelo Michel

    Discussion 49 : 02/08/2010 at 01:49 PM49

    @D43 :
    Short memories ...

    Before the PAD evezr existed, I remember some anti-thaï pogroms in Cambodia !

    The Cambodians I now do not know why, but they hate Thaïland, with or without PAD !

    Then I am sorry, but the fact that the Temple was obviously built by the Khmer Empire does not make it a Cambodian property ... (whe, french, have Roman ruins in Paris and it does NOT make Paris italian).

  • moonoi

    Discussion 48 : 02/08/2010 at 12:54 PM48

    Hello info warrior,
    I quote:"A sovereign, self-sufficient, nationalistic nation is the foundation of individual freedom."
    this is almost 1:1 form the party program of the NSDAP in germany from 1933.(at least it's a program)
    But tzhat is absolutely nonsense. i think North korea is amost there where you want to see Thailand. the Khmer Rouge tried it too. please.. "sovereign, self-sufficient, nationalistic nation" is politics out of the 20th century recycle bin.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar


  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top