Burma, North Korea in an unholy military alliance

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Burma, North Korea in an unholy military alliance

  • Published: 29/06/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Burma's burning ambition to acquire modern missile technology and to upgrade its conventional weapons is no longer a secret and, if left unchecked, could pose a destabilising threat to regional stability.

Thailand, its most prominent historical enemy, should be concerned - its military leaders would not like to see a Burma in possession of missiles that could easily lead to a tit-for-tat arms race. Also, of course, there's the generals' chronic fear of the West, heightened last year when foreign navy vessels showed up off the Burmese shore in an effort to deliver relief items and water to cyclone victims in the Irrawaddy delta region.

Since then, Burmese leaders have increasingly been looking for a source of medium-range missiles and sophisticated anti-aircraft and radar systems to deter imagined external threats.

Recent reports suggest Gen Thura Shwe Mann, the regime's No 3 man, made a secret visit to North Korea in November 2008, no doubt with a shopping list for the above items.

Gen Shwe Mann, chief of staff of the army, navy and air force, and the coordinator of special operations, made a secret, seven-day visit to Pyongyang on Nov 22, travelling there via China.

His 17-member, high-level delegation was given an important sightseeing visit to Pyongyang and Myohyang, where secret tunnels have been built into the mountains to store and shield jet aircraft, missiles, tanks and nuclear and chemical weapons.

Accompanied by air defence chief Lt Gen Myint Hlaing, Brig Gen Hla Htay Win, Brig Gen Khin Aung Myint and senior officials from heavy industries, the delegation was clearly on a mission to cement stronger military ties with the reclusive, hermit state.

On Nov 27, Gen Shwe Mann and Gen Kim Kyok-sik, chief of general staff, signed a MoU, officially formalising the military cooperation between Burma and North Korea.

North Korea will reportedly build or supervise the construction of some Burmese military facilities, including tunnels and caves in which missiles, aircraft and even naval ships could be hidden. Burma will also receive expert training for its special forces, air defence training, plus a language exchange programme between personnel in the two armed forces.

Burmese army sources in Naypyidaw confirmed that the secret arms-procurement mission covered most of the generals' wish list.

During his seven-day visit, Gen Shwe Mann, who is presumed to be the heir apparent to take over Burma's armed forces, visited radar and jamming units in Myohyang, a highly sophisticated anti-aircraft unit, air force units and a computerised command control system in Pyongyang.

The delegation also visited a surface-to-surface (Scud) missile factory, partially housed in tunnels, on the outskirts of Pyongyang to observe missile production. Since the late 1980s, North Korea has sold hundreds of Scud-type missiles and Scud production technology to Iran, Syria and Egypt.

The Scud-D missile, with a range of 700 kilometres, and the Scud-E missile, with a range of 1,500km, could easily intimidate Burma's neighbours, including Thailand. It is believed that Burma already has deployed six radar air defence systems along the Thai-Burmese border.

During the visit, the Burmese were also particularly interested in short-range 107mm and 240mm multi-rocket launchers - a multi-purpose missile defence system in case of a foreign invasion, analysts said.

Also of great interest was the latest in anti-tank, laser-guided missile technology that can be deployed within an infantry division. Defence analysts say Burma has already purchased short- and medium-range missiles from North Korea under a barter deal.

It is not known if regime leaders have already put in an order for Scud-D or the more powerful Scud-F missiles, with a range of 3,000km. To suppress ethnic insurgents, the regime doesn't need such sophisticated weapons, but Burma's strong interest in missile, radar, Awac air defence systems, GPS communication jammers and search radar indicates that Naypyidaw's leaders envision both defensive and offensive capabilities.

Historically, Burma has procured small arms, jet fighters and naval ships from the West, namely the United States, Britain and some European countries. But after brutally crushing the 1988 democracy uprising, it faced Western sanctions and Burmese leaders desperately looked for new sources of weapons and ammunition to modernise and upgrade its armed forces. Burma has bought jet fighters and naval ships from China but increasingly it's looked for alternatives because of low quality and poor after-sales service

In the past, Burma purchased a "Pechora" air defence system - a Russian-made, surface-to-air, anti-aircraft system. Analysts say the Russians have provided technical training and language courses to Burmese technicians.

The junta continues to strengthen its military capacity and spends the country's precious foreign reserves on more and more sophisticated weapons.

When Gen Maung Aye, the regime's number two, visited Moscow in April 2006, he told Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov that Burma wished to order more Russian-made MiG-29 jet fighters (in addition to the 12 it had already secured), as well as 12 secondhand MI-17 helicopters.

During the Moscow visit, the deputy chief of the armed forces also expressed a desire to build a short-range guided missile system in central Burma with assistance from Russia.

Curiously, say analysts, Gen Shwe Mann and his delegation also studied the subway system in the North Korean capital - in theory an underground subway is an effective way to deploy and mobilise troops during a conflict in an urban area.

As early as 2002-2003, Burma begun to build underground tunnels and caves to hide and protect aircraft and weapons, as well as to house a central command and control facility.

Foreign analysts note that Burma was humiliated when it lost serious military skirmishes with Thailand in 2001 and 2002.

Thailand employed F-16 jet fighters along its border and successfully disrupted Burma's communication system between its troops in the front line and its central command.

The generals seem determined to go into the next field of battle with equal if not superior forces.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine - http://www.irrawaddy.org

Relate Search: Burma, North Korea, military

About the author

Writer: AUNG ZAW

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Balan Oakenring

    Discussion 3 : 29/08/2009 at 05:39 PM3

    It has been suggested that Burma's Gen Thura Shwe Mann's recent study of North Korea's subway systems is for the defense of cities by the swift transportation of troops underground. This is an enormously expensive system to put into place and maintain for that kind of purpose.
    The subway system that Burma is interested in is unlikely to be for moving troops beneath a city. This is especially so if the subway is constructed in the country rather than in an urban area.

    For countries without nuclear submarines a subway system is the next best thing to disguise the location of nuclear missiles. Missiles transported by rail on individual rail-cars that are also launching platforms can be difficult to detect by air surveillance or satellite. The cars can be frequently in motion and their location spread over a wide underground area making them unlikely to be eliminated by a first nuclear strike.

  • Bill Canada

    Discussion 2 : 29/06/2009 at 10:39 AM2

    Khun Samuel,
    Many people would like to see the whole world get together to do a lot of needed things. Two world wars ended with the establishment of organizations that were chartered to do that. Both organizations have failed miserably. In the area of your concern, which I’ll call proactive Burmese regime change, democracy did not work. A noble prize winner legally voted to lead the country has been kept under house arrest for years. I hesitate to use the phrase, regime change, because of the widespread use of it to negatively describe the United States’ removal of Saddam Hussein from power. At best, the League of Nations’, successor, the United Nations is a slow moving reactive organization that does not resort to action until the damage is done. For instance: the Chinese attempt to communize the entire Korean peninsula in the 50s, the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in the 90s and I won’t bother to mention the numerous failures to even react or miserable token reaction during numerous African crises.
    Your suggestion to remove Burma from ASEAN is good from a security standpoint, but will it make the SDSC more belligerent? I don’t think anything, short of a regime change, will keep the Generals from their belligerent intentions. They need to protect their narcotics and other nefarious businesses. Martial rule is their chosen means.
    I am neither privileged nor knowledgeable enough to pretend to have access to information about how to bring about this regime change. My message is simply to compliment you for caring and wanting peace in this part of Asia. I’m sorry that my only helpful idea is a proactive regime change without any idea how to make it happen.

  • Samuel Sims

    Discussion 1 : 29/06/2009 at 06:29 AM1

    I have said before, the Burmese are secretly dangerous in the region especially to its traditionally enemy Thailand, first of all Burma should be kicked out of ASEAN, Thailand should shut off all its borders from Burma which should deters all its intelligence sneaking into Thailand for information. ASEAN by now should be aware of Burma secret communist ambition but it seems that they are not doing enough to contain the Burmese, when things erupts, the first to suffer is Thailand especially to its border towns in Mae Sai and Kanchanaburi. Burma at the moment is too poor to establish nuclear arms but with weapons coming from North Korea in bulk recently is enough to cause intense hurt to its own people and damage to its neighbours especially Thailand. I think the whole world should get together to get rid of the present military generals and their cronies before it becomes another North Korea, then it would be too late.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top