EDITORIAL Drug supply and resistance

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

EDITORIAL Drug supply and resistance

  • Published: 31/07/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

The Public Health Ministry has made a high-risk decision in extending its distribution of the anti-viral drug oseltamivir to clinics across the country, to ensure speedy access of the medicine for 2009 flu patients. While Health Minister Withaya Kaewparadai should be commended for his political courage, all Thais now can only hope that his decision in battling the flu is correct and that it will not lead to the problem of drug resistance now widely feared among experts in the field.


There is no doubt that the present flu pandemic has reached an alarming stage and this requires decisive responses by policy-makers holding political power like Mr Withaya. However, doubts have still remained whether his decision to expand the drug distribution network to the clinic level, which may compromise its control, was well thought-out and should actually be reviewed.

It has been obvious from the start that top ministry officials have been split over whether the distribution of oseltamivir should be extended from hospitals to some 7,000 private and state clinics around the country. The pandemic fatalities which jumped from 44 deaths last week to 65 this week has apparently compelled the health minister to act despite the voice of disapproval from virologists. The virus experts are concerned that without proper control of the drug's distribution, the uncontrolled prescription of the medicine may lead to the problem of drug resistance and further complicate their efforts to fight the flu.

The virologists' concern is highly understandable. Reports about drug resistance cases in some countries such as Denmark, Hong Kong, Canada and Japan are a warning sign for more discretion in drug use. The government's decision in ordering 20,000 doses of zanamivir, the second-line flu drug in case patients developed resistance to the first-line medicine oseltamivir, demonstrates that the health authority is aware of this possible problem.

Reports that some of the second-line drug have been sent to Siriraj Hospital to treat patients developing resistance to oseltamivir, show that the problem has actually already taken place here.

In pushing for wider distribution of oseltamivir, the Ministry of Public Health is apparently gambling on the hope that a set of drug distribution guidelines drawn up by a ministerial sub-committee will work.

These guidelines include the requirement that these clinics must have doctors who are trained by the ministry to prescribe the medicine. They are also required to provide daily reports on all cases experiencing drug side-effects to the ministry. The clinics must also be equipped with sterilised rooms and a post-treatment monitoring system.

Provincial public health in each province, under the same guidelines, has to closely monitor treatment standard, the prescription process and the upkeep of the sterilised rooms at clinics joining the programme monthly. These clinics have to strictly follow the standard issued by the Ministry of Public Health at all times.

Despite all these stringent requirements to ensure drug distribution efficiency, no one can rest completely assured that the system set up by the ministry will work as it should.

It is, therefore, the duty of the ministry to make sure that these guidelines are strictly followed.

Without a serious monitoring system and strict enforcement of the measures, the country could risk seeing a deadlier pandemic at hand. And the damage could be far beyond our imagining.

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • John

    Discussion 5 : 02/08/2009 at 09:15 AM5

    @Independent Thai: No, I'm not a doctor, so feel free not to listen to my opinion. I have however a quite good scientific background and follow closely the information available on the flu.

    I understand you feel worried about your health, but we have to think globally, not individually.

    My point is that distribution of Oseltamivir should be decided by a selected list of doctors, specially trained for this new disease and reporting to a centralized administration.

    When your doctor thinks you need the drug, he contacts the "specialized" doctor who will decide to prescribe the drug.

    This might look like loosing time for the patient, but my experience here is that your doctor will prescribe you anything you want as long as you pay for it. The chance that many people are given the drug for no reason at all is great and that's what we should be careful of.

    In most of the countries, the centralization of distribution of tamiflu/oseltalivir has be decided.
    Here, it is the opposite, probably a political decision more than a medical one. It makes the population feel safer, while it actually endangers them.

  • Independent Thai

    Discussion 4 : 01/08/2009 at 10:37 PM4

    @John #3
    You forgot to read my last sentence on my discussion#2.
    The life of the people alway is valuable to anything else.
    I don't know who is John.If Jonh is a doctor,he is a incompetent doctor,he should go back to re -educate again. If he is a patient who is diagnoted H1N1 infection ,he want to risk his life for the drug resistant,I applauded him.

    The golden rule of the the competent doctor is the doctor never prescribe any unneccessary medicine to the patient,otherwise a docror is the incompetent and corrupted person.

    WE need the competent doctor and the effective guild line for the immediately diagnosis and appropitiated treatment on time and the right doses of the medicine.

  • John

    Discussion 3 : 01/08/2009 at 09:00 AM3

    @Independent Thai:
    I'm sorry, but your reasoning is wrong: drug resistance is dangerous for patients life.

    If drugs are prescribed to patients who don't need it:
    - it doesn't help them
    - it increase the risk of creating drug-resistant virus

    Once drug resistant virus is spread, then many many lifes will be lost, simply because there is no other drug that can treat the disease.

    Distributing widely is a short term thinking. In long term, drug-resistant virus will kill more.

    Patients like you , worried (though understandably), will be the ones pressuring their doctors to get this drug the don't need and, without knowing it, endanger thousands of lives.

  • Independent Thai

    Discussion 2 : 31/07/2009 at 12:02 PM2

    It is the foolish thought that we are afraid of the drug redsistant to H1N! more than the life of the patients

    .I read in the news paper few days ago,the doctor are fear to treat the patient because they are afraid that it will increase the incident drug resistant. I think it is a stupid opinion because the life of the patient is more valuable than the drug resistant,

    The most important that the doctor have to make the right diagnosis of the H1N1 flu and then make the propitious treatment.

  • John

    Discussion 1 : 31/07/2009 at 10:48 AM1

    This is clearly a mistake.

    Guidelines will NOT be followed, Doctors will be put under pressure by their customers (not patients) and will deliver to whoever pays the price.

    In French medical schools, Thailand is given as an example demonstrating how over-prescription of antibiotics creates resistant infections.

    Obviously we are on the same path for antivirals.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top