Hun Sen's harsh words

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Hun Sen's harsh words

  • Published: 1/10/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

Once again Prime Minister Hun Sen of Cambodia has tested the limits of civilised neighbourliness and failed. His rant to the local and international media that he has ordered troops to shoot Thais who cross the border, surely crossed the line of diplomatic language. Any such order from the commander to troops to shoot civilians is both cruel and illegal.

It is understandable that the Khmer premier was angered by the demonstration in Si Sa Ket by fringe elements of the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD). It is neither acceptable nor level-headed to threaten to use deadly force against other people in retaliation.

The latest anti-Thai rant came at a high-profile news conference that was meant to gain wide circulation across his country. And it succeeded, with Cambodian media spreading it. Instead of talking about Cambodia's new tourism initiative, the premier launched irresponsibly into rhetoric that was as inflammatory as it was offensive. And worse, it was even more public and more pointed than the 2003 anti-Thailand tirade that emboldened thousands of so-called Khmer nationalists to trigger murderous and highly destructive riots in Phnom Penh. Mobs shouting Hun Sen slogans torched the Thai embassy, tore down Thai businesses and offices, and attempted to murder Thai diplomats and visitors.

That terrible violence of six years ago was set off by a stupid rumour that a Thai actress had denounced Cambodian ownership of Angkor Wat. Without a pause to try to confirm this ridiculous story, Prime Minister Hun Sen played to the mob and pandered to the rumour-mongers. The result was a night of fires and deadly danger to Thais and Cambodians alike in the capital.

One would think that such an atrocious act would have warned the Cambodian premier of the dangers of going too far with nationalist rhetoric. Today, one wonders if Mr Hun Sen really regrets such mob action.

The Cambodian love of Angkor Wat is as clear as its ownership. No Thai government, no Thai political party or group, no academic department or textbook makes any Thai claim to the iconic temple displayed on the Cambodian flag. Mr Hun Sen has clearly tried to parlay the issue of disputed border land into the tired old claim that Thailand is trying to steal Angkor Wat from Cambodia.

Thailand and Cambodia have property disputes, like virtually all land neighbours in the world. Many places along the border, including the sea border, are claimed by the two countries. Premier Hun Sen, however, has tried to connect totally unrelated dots. The 4.6 square kilometres of disputed land is not the same as the Preah Vihear temple, which is not the same as Angkor Wat.

The government, the foreign ministry, the parliamentary coalition and the loyal opposition of the Thai Parliament all agree: Preah Vihear temple belongs to Cambodia as, of course, does Angkor Wat. There are Thais who disagree with this legal policy, just as there are far too many Cambodians liable to be whipped into another racist, murderous fury when their prime minister speaks violently and irrationally about it.

Mr Hun Sen is threatening to boycott the upcoming Asean summit over this issue, which is almost entirely a figment of his own imagination. The Cambodian leader should be more realistic. He is no longer under the influence of the anti-foreigner, anti-neighbour Pol Pot gang. He should not so clearly and harmfully pander to the misguided and violent "nationalists" of his country, who only aim to harm Thai-Cambodian relations. Instead, he should work a little harder to improve them.

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Bern

    Discussion 30 : 04/10/2009 at 02:44 PM30

    Please do some research of the real facts between Thai and Cambodia before made any comments. Do not base your opinion on the media that may distorted the real facts.

  • CalmKhmer

    Discussion 29 : 04/10/2009 at 02:02 AM29

    Remember 9/11 - the day Thai soldiers shot and burned a Cambodian logger alive. There's no justification for their cruel and inhumane act.

  • Tommy

    Discussion 28 : 03/10/2009 at 07:03 PM28

    I don't totally agree with the news. I think it may be that Hun Sen had tried to warned PAD directly. However, words may have changed through media. I believe that we have political problems over this land and I agree that we should use political ways to do the jobe. I think Hun Sen knows that PAD and Kasit Piromya are somehow close to each other. Could it be that he tries to warn more on Thai foreign policy than anything else.

  • Doris

    Discussion 27 : 02/10/2009 at 03:26 AM27

    Let's hope the PAD and politicians in Thailand also understand "the dangers of going too far with nationalist rhetoric".

  • Doris

    Discussion 26 : 02/10/2009 at 03:24 AM26

    Let's hope the PAD and politicians in Thailand also understand "the dangers of going too far with nationalist rhetoric".

  • John Porntid

    Discussion 25 : 01/10/2009 at 09:55 PM25

    Hun Sen harsh comment is direcly in response to cruel and illegal treatment of Thai soldiers who shot and burn a Cambodian logger while he still alive. Of course, he took the opportunity to give PAD some warning if they try to trespassing into the disputed area. Maybe Thai government itself cannot handle PAD so it asked Hun Sen to send the message on their behave.

  • NESTOR D. FERMIN

    Discussion 24 : 01/10/2009 at 03:07 PM24

    Everything boils down to one thing: The issue of ownership of the disputed temple and land. For those Thais who claim Thailand own the thing in dispute, they can go to Cambodia and apply for Cambodian citizenship so they can stay there forever.

  • BangkokRay

    Discussion 23 : 01/10/2009 at 02:37 PM23

    Seems to me that Hun Sen just took a chapter out of PAD leader/supporter Kasit's playbook.
    This isue was decided nearly 50 years ago, yet a select group of Thai's just can't live with that decision. This same select group took control of GH and 3 International airports last year and are at it again. They can do it with impunity because unlike their opposition, they will not be held accountable.

  • namton

    Discussion 22 : 01/10/2009 at 02:33 PM22

    Hun Sen is right to order to shoot. The PAD is just like gangster that rule the laws. They closed the Airport, Goverment Building and just now, they want to set up a political party, which foreign country would want to invest in Thailand if PAD is the goverment?, Guess what, the last closure of the International Airport show no respect for tourist or any human right group would do that. We, tourist were innocent human which do not involve with your politic but wanted to visited Thailand as a land with thousand smile but instead we get a Thousand Hooglian to stop us from going home and enjoy our hoilday here. Once Bitten twice shy...... Let the PAD be the goverment and let see it leader can last 3 days.
    The whole world is watching. Current goverment is working very hard for all Thai people and both the red and yellow should respect the law. One group will follow what the other group do, like the cancellation of the ASean Summit. They did as bad as the yellow group....make the PM look so bad to all his guest, he is just doing his job.

    Let it Be,
    Namton

  • DDuck

    Discussion 21 : 01/10/2009 at 02:13 PM21

    Meow Meow, most of what you write has nothing to do with the current situation it seems to be a desperate attempt to justify Thailands behaviour. It's true that the Khmer rougue were an abomination but many in Thailand benefited from doing deals with them on things like logging and gem trading I don't see you condeming that.
    As for "Thailand is not a wealthy country" this is a common excuse for uncivilized behaviour. Thailand is a lot richer than it's neighbours and compared to the rest of the world is right in the middle when it comes to wealth.
    "It is not suprising they threaten to kill their neighbours" you say.
    Well at least they warn people first unlike the Thai soldiers who shot and burnt the body of a poor young man trying to make a living.
    Did Thailand warn the Rohinga refugees that they would send them out to sea with no provisions? I don't think so.
    Were the PAD's actions at the border civilized and diplomatic? Most people would say no they weren't
    When you talk so much about uncivilized third world behaviour maybe you should look closer to home.
    As for "arguing over religous temples with threats of death", this was settled by the International Court of Justice. It is Thailand that is arguing and not accepting the judgement and it is backed up with plenty of Thai soldiers. Do you expect the Cambodians to just run away and say ok you have it then?

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top