Hun Sen blames Thailand (and Abhisit) all the way

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Hun Sen blames Thailand (and Abhisit) all the way

  • Published: 12/11/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

What drives Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen's foreign policy towards Thailand? Here are excerpt from an interview Hun Sen gave to the press on Nov 8, after returning from the Mekong-Japan summit.

This picture taken Nov 8 and released by China’s Xinhua news agency shows Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen holding a press conference at the airport in Phnom Penh, during which he lambasted the present Thai government.

Thai-Cambodian relations

What is going on in Thai-Cambodian relations is essentially a problem between me and Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva. I would urge people who wish to comment on this issue to do their research. When I started to work in the political arena, the Thai PM was still a child running around.

Close the border if you want to

The Thai side has been quoted in the press saying that it would pressure Cambodia by sealing off the border. I say, close it if you want to. Cambodia will follow suit.

If Thailand orders the border shut, don't stop at blocking the flow of people. Because Cambodia would close it too, and we will block economic activities as well. We will forbid all Thai goods from coming into the Cambodia market. Even one pig would not be able to cross.

Cambodia can import every Thai product from other countries. Let me cite as an example the statistics on Thai-Cambodian trade in 2008. Thailand's export to Cambodia was worth about US$2 billion while Cambodia's export to Thailand was only US$90 million.

Still, I agree with the Thai PM's statement that [foreign relations] measures to be issued won't affect people in the two countries because I myself do not wish to do so [shut the border] either. It is not in line with the idea of cooperation under the Asean framework.

Although I do not want to have to resort to such a measure, the Thai leader is threatening me so much. Therefore, I am giving an order to all relevant Cambodian officials to be prepared for it [closing the border and banning Thai products].

On the appointment of Thai adviser

On the issue of the appointment of former Thai PM as adviser, I would like to declare, loud and clear, to the Thai people so they realise that as far as this problem is concerned, it is PM Abhisit who has meddled with Cambodia.

Think about it carefully and determine who is at fault here, Hun Sen or Abhisit? There is no way I will retreat.

Cambodia has appointed many foreigners as advisers, both Korean and Australian nationals. What does the Thai PM have to fear if Thaksin resides in Cambodia?

Thaksin has been around the world and he [Abhisit] has done nothing about it. He has just been to Sri Lanka and nothing was done about that. Only after Thaksin said he would come to Cambodia that our country has been targeted.

I already explained this at the meeting in Hua Hin on Oct 23. I have tried to be patient and remain silent. But the Thai PM and Thailand have kept on criticising me.

As for the revocation of the MoU, it is Mr Abhisit who has put the common interest of both countries under harm.

Who is using whom?

Regarding the statement issued by the Thai Foreign Ministry on Nov 5, in which Mr Abhisit claimed he could not stay put when Thailand was humiliated, I will tell you what do the Thai people really think.

The Red Shirts support the appointment [of Thaksin as adviser]. The Yellow Shirts are angry and have expressed their opposition and protest. There is also another group which is indifferent and stays silent. These people know that the Hun Sen government is a good one, that we made them feel comfortable _ with money to spend _ when Thaksin was prime minister. The harder PM Abhisit pushes us, the stronger the reaction will be.

PM Abhisit warned me not to become a pawn in Thaksin's game. We are nobody's tool. I also wonder who is being used by whom. Abhisit let himself be used by Thaksin. When Thaksin made an opening, Abhisit jumped out and retaliated without thinking, without considering the national interest.

[He] said from Tokyo about the MoU cancellation. Thai people should consider the issue for themselves: the assets belong to the state but it is the personal matter that caused the cooperation to stop. Can Thai people accept that? Can someone like this serve as the Asean leader?

In 2012, Asean will cooperate in many areas. Member states will open the borders so that people can travel freely. We will adopt the same currency.

But Thailand is evidently attacking Cambodia. It sent troops to occupy Cambodian land.

Where was Thailand during the Angkor era? They claimed that Cambodia trespassed into Thai territory, but how could we? Study your history and see who the aggressor is.

Red Shirts' Permission

Thaksin is not our tool. I want to employ Thakin's experience, to ask him for help on Cambodia's economic affairs. I would like to take this opportunity to ask for permission from the Red Shirt brothers and Puea Thai Party to allow me to bring Than Thaksin to Cambodia to help with our economy.

Asean's deliberation, once and for all

Asean Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan issued a statement urging for a solution to the problem. I agree with him. But it seems the Asean Sec Gen's proposal is not in line with the Thai government's stance.

The truth is, Cambodia is always ready for a dialogue, whether it is a bilateral or multilateral one. But the Thai government rejected it.

Than Surin has to understand, though, that Asean should consider these problems comprehensively and solve them all in one go. These include the Thaksin problem, the Sept 19 coup, the intrusion into Cambodia's territory, the appointment of Thaksin as Cambodia's adviser. Cambodia is prepared to engage either at a bilateral or multilateral level.

I actually wanted to raise this issue at the Hua Hin summit but I restrained the urge. Think of it as my consideration towards Thailand and Mr Abhisit.

To solve this issue, we must tackle it from the origin. Since this has to do with Thaksin, we have to start at the Sept 19, 2006 coup.

If Abhisit is so sure of himself, then he should call an election. What are you afraid of? Is it that you are afraid you will no longer be the PM? Are you afraid that Puea Thai party will win the election?

I am Prime Minister of Cambodia who has received two-thirds of the vote in the Cambodian parliament. How many does Than Abhisit have? You've stolen somebody else's chair to seat yourself in. You claim other people's property as your own. How can we respect that?

Thai military and intelligence

Abhisit is so buried in problems himself he may not survive. He has problems with all the neighbouring countries _ Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia and Burma. He also has problems in the South of Thailand, problems about the Yellow Shirts, Red Shirts, Blue Shirts, White Shirts, and Puea Thai. The Yellow Shirts aren't in harmony themselves. What does Thailand have that Cambodia has to respect?

Thaksin's appointment has nothing to do with Thailand. I told Abhisit when I met him that Thaksin is my friend. Friends do not betray friends. Friends cannot feed friends to the tiger.

So, if you want to tear up anything, do so. If you want to shut down anything, do so. It's probably not convenient to keep things open anyway.

We will probably have to withdraw the 911 [special force] unit within this week. A small force should be enough.

As for the rumour that Thaksin has been in Cambodia many times, I deny it. It is evident that your intelligence is flawed. It reflects the weakness in your information gathering ability.

Respect for international law

Referring to the accusation that Cambodia does not respect the Thai court, I don't see any value in the Thai justice system worthy of respect.

In the past, Khieu Samphan or Noun Chea [of the Khmer Rouge] were allowed to live [given refuge] in Thailand before they were arrested upon entering Cambodia. Thailand had signed a pact not to support the Khmer Rouge.

Thailand did more than violate international law. It had signed a peace pact. And it violated many things. Thai people should consider this. If Thailand does not respect international law, how can you expect us to respect Thai law?

The above has been translated from a summary published Nov 11, 2009 in Matichon.

Relate Search: Hun Sen, Abhisit Vejjajiva, Thaksin Shinawatra, UDD

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • oh civilized!

    Discussion 12 : 12/11/2009 at 05:29 PM12

    @ discussion 11

    you should have pointed out where PM Hun Sen speak like an immature and uncivilized teenager.

    you suggested that PM Hun Sen should have used more civilized language while you did not try to be civilized. This is the real Thai problem, despite your being labeled yourself as Khmar Man.

    just my two cents.

  • Khmar Man

    Discussion 11 : 12/11/2009 at 03:42 PM11

    I think, PM Hun Sen need to take more time to learn to speck the mature, high level and civilized language. I can not believe my ear and my eye to hear and see country leader speaking immature teenage words. May be some one in Cambodia should provide him some training to speak and react as civilized and mature adult person.

  • Chan

    Discussion 10 : 12/11/2009 at 12:34 PM10

    The hornet's nest was unnecessarily stirred when the present government and the dark forces behind it tried to discredit the elected pro-Thaksin government back then. Lives and limbs were lost when Thailand and Cambodia battled it out. The people who suffered were the Thai and Cambodian residents near Phra Vihear. The people manipulated into this whole fiasco were nationalists living thousands of km from the border.

    Can Cambodia ever work with such a government?

  • Ramon

    Discussion 9 : 12/11/2009 at 11:19 AM9

    Thanks BP for the excerpt. However, there are some misleading information (perhaps due to translation).
    An example:
    "[He] said from Tokyo about the MoU cancellation. Thai people should consider the issue for themselves: the assets belong to the state but it is the personal matter that caused the cooperation to stop. Can Thai people accept that? Can someone like this serve as the Asean leader?"

    In the original message (verbal, Khmer) he asked the question "who is mixing personal interest and the two countries' interest? Hun Sen or Abhisit?
    He said Hun Sen just appoint an individual (Thaksin) to be an economic adviser, it's an personal issue. But Abhisit takes this the interest of the two countries and put in trush bin, by downgrade diplomatic relations and concellation of MoU.

    Regarding the MoU, Hun Sen said, if you terminate MoU unilaterally, it meams that you are respect the "state legacy". If you don't respect the state legacy how can other countries trust you?

    "State legacy" he refers to: agreements signed by previous governments with other governments have to be respected by the succeeding government, whether the previous governments were good or bad, the succeeding governments have to live with it. If you want to amend, it must be mutual agreement to do so.

    Once again, thanks BP for this.

  • Pope

    Discussion 8 : 12/11/2009 at 10:50 AM8

    Danish Dinamit and Boonisback's are well stated. I mean we living in an era of co-existence and integration, the rule of law and will of an electoral government body.

    Thailand could have been a good example for neighboring countries to learn from: that respect is washed away. However, this current episodes of political charade has destroyed that country's credibility and trust within the population and neighbors. Thailand has gone backward

  • A Khmer

    Discussion 7 : 12/11/2009 at 10:35 AM7

    Danish Dinamit, you are right!

  • A Khmer

    Discussion 6 : 12/11/2009 at 10:32 AM6

    Mr. Bangkok Post,

    You have wrongly translated some points of Mr. Hun Sen's speech. You should not add or fake his speech. This will lead more misunderstanding between the two nation. If you don't know Khmer Language, try to learn more.

    For example:

    - Mr. Hun Sen did not say "Cambodia can import every Thai product from other countries", but he says "Cambodia can import other countries'products"

    - He did not say "ven one pig would not be able to cross."

    - He did not say "Friends cannot feed friends to the tiger."

    - He did not say "I don't see any value in the Thai justice system worthy of respect." He just said "thai court decision is not covering in cambodia..."

    So you are A BIG FAT LIAR to ur country.

    visit this:

    http://svichet.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-nation-the-big-fat-liar/

  • a Khmer in Phnom Penh

    Discussion 5 : 12/11/2009 at 10:31 AM5

    maybe not all of what hun sen said are undeniable or incontestable, but there are some facts and objectivity in substance.

    abhisit, the Democrats, PAD and thai people in general should learn to accept thing as it is.

    there is a khmer saying: "the truth is always bitter (to swallow/accept)"

  • Hirata

    Discussion 4 : 12/11/2009 at 07:52 AM4

    Key message has been translated.

  • boonisback

    Discussion 3 : 12/11/2009 at 07:41 AM3

    The title of this translated interview should be 'Hun Sen talked from his heart and mind'. As usual all those associated with the democrats and dictated by the dictators would continue to blame for the problems they created.

    I don't like to use strong word but I have to. This illegitimate government and its masters are putting Thailand to shame. It is a disgrace to Thailand. Our relationship with neighboring countries is getting worse. Don't push your problems associated with the success of TRT and Thaksin to your neighbours.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top