POSTBAG
Re: ''Nitirat ban splits student body'' (BP, Feb 3).
Having different views on issues and confronting them in vigorous and healthy debate is part of any mature democracy. Important ideas in the political, social or scientific fields have emerged from these dialectic exchanges, where people listen to each other and then enrich their own concepts from the input of others. Saying that contradictory debate must be avoided in the name of national security is preaching for uniformity of thinking and closing the mind, like uniforms clothing the body.
Nidhi Eoseewong is right that citing violence as a reason to bar people from expressing their opinions is to place in doubt the very existence of democracy.
This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

