Country's in for it in a very bad way

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Country's in for it in a very bad way

  • Published: 26/11/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

How will this political mess end? Will Thaksin Shinawatra finally return to haunt us with his bottomless greed? Or will the old, oppressive system that perpetuates social injustice prevail to suffocate us?

Is there any way out of this madness?

Ask historian/thinker Nidhi Eeo-seewong, and his answer is a resounding no. In his latest column in Matichon newspaper, he predicted that the proxy wars between the two ruling elite groups - one led by Thaksin, and the other by the old ruling clique - will not only continue to play out on the streets, but they would also get more violent.

"Thailand will never be the same again," he wrote. "There is no use in being nostalgic. Instead, we must put our heads together to find out how to minimise the damage."

How, indeed? How can normalcy return when the root problem of extreme economic disparity remains unaddressed? How extreme? Prof Pasuk Phongpaichit did not leave room for doubt about our shamelessly unfair society in her recent keynote speech on "Towards a Fair Society" at the King Prachadhipok Institute conference. Among the glaring facts:

- The top 20% own 69% of the country's assets while the bottom 20% own only 1%.

- 42% of bank savings money comes from only 70,000 bank accounts holding more than 10 million baht. They make up only 0.09% of all bank accounts in the country. In other words, less than 1% of the people own nearly half of the country's savings.

- Among the farming families, nearly 20% of them are landless, or about 811,871 families, while 1-1.5 million farming families are tenants or struggling with insufficient land.

- 10% of land owners own more than 100 rai each, while the rest 90% own one rai or less.

- On income distribution, the top 20% enjoy more than 50% of the gross domestic product while the bottom 20% only 4%.

- The average income of the bottom 20% is the same as the poverty line at 1,443 baht per month.

- The gap between the richest and poorest family is 13 times, higher than all our neighbouring countries.

A fairer taxation system could reduce this economic disparity, she said. This can be done by expanding the base of direct taxpayers, introducing progressive land, inheritance, capital gains and interest taxes, for example. Unfortunately, the current taxation system worsens economic disparity by allowing easy tax evasion among the super rich while focusing on direct taxation which treats the poor the same as the rich. Talk about justice!

State expenditure on free education, public health welfare, a comprehensive social security system and better agricultural policies have proven elsewhere to help bridge the gap, she said.

In Thailand, however, the amount of state expenditure is not only too small, most of them benefit the cities, thus worsening the gap between the rich and the poor.

The lack of political will among the power cliques and corruption are apparently Thailand's biggest obstacles. But the decline of public trust in parliamentary/money politics is no reason to debunk it, she insists. It is still the best system to allow democracy to grow more strongly, to effect fair taxation and state spending for the public good, to fight corruption and facilitate peaceful conflict resolution. "We just need to be patient."

Last week, political scientist Seksan Prasertkul also offered his views on how to minimise Thailand's future pain. When society has become fragmented and pluralised by competing economic interests and globalisation pressures, the best damage-control strategy is to institutionalise participatory decision-making from the ground up, give political decentralisation a stronger push, and be more open to civil society voices.

As the clash of the titans looms, we should not let their cautionary advice go unheeded. No matter who wins, their priority is to strengthen their interests and power. Without participatory politics, democracy will continue to be unstable. And without fixing the stark economic disparity through fairer taxation and state expenditure, the country's prospects ahead are indeed grim.

Sanitsuda Ekachai is Assistant Editor (Outlook), Bangkok Post.
Email:
sanitsudae@bangkokpost.co.th

Relate Search: Thaksin Shinawatra, Nidhi Eeo-seewong

About the author

columnist
Writer: Sanitsuda Ekachai
Position: Assistant Editor (Outlook)

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • Peter Quinlan

    Discussion 7 : 27/11/2009 at 07:41 AM7

    At last - the light turns on. The positive outcomes that can be taken from the Thaksin era, derived from short term, self-interested policies, must be separated from the man himself.

    Let's focus on policies, not individuals of any brand, for a change.

  • Aussie John

    Discussion 6 : 27/11/2009 at 04:29 AM6

    Peter you make a great point about foreign investment laws in Thailand.
    There are thousands of foreign husbands married to Thai nationals who are restricted from particpating and contributing to their local areas even at a voluntary level.
    Many of these impoverished areas could benefit enormously giving empowerment to the families these foreigners want to support.
    Yet Thai immigration laws not only forbid land ownership but also deter small business investment as they claim it undermines the opportunities for Thais. Ironically this the elites are already doing as we see from the proven statistics on distribution of wealth in the kingdom. The Poor are still very poor.
    Large foreign investment is welcome as you need wealthy Thai nominees to control the 50% state, something the poor can not obviously compete with.
    When the laws are discussed the government and the elites pull out the 'nationalist card' inciting a 'imperial take over' by foreign entities while in reality the small elite Thai class controls the majority of wealth. They themselves are the domestic IMPERIALISTS .!!
    I'm fascinated by the Thai governments recent push to have Thais invest externally yet at home they go out of their way to restrict opprotunity to the many poor Thai married to foreign nationals.
    Thais in the west are free to not only own land but secure fair PR status/citizenship which gives them REAL SECURITY as well as the opportunity to participate in all kinds of business activities.
    Activities that stimulate the economy, not threaten it.
    Why if the elite wont support the poor are the foreign spouses denied the right to contribute their investment, knowledge and skills in communities that surely need it.
    Is it that the elites need the poor to remain as their foot servants in their lucritve businesses in the capital.
    It seems couter productive to limit the investment to just one area, when in western countries small businesses which many expat Thais own and control have helped contribute not only to the cultural diversity of the country but also ECONOMIC VALUE.
    In a nut shell expat Thais are free to self determine their SECURITY as the western nations' democracy has EMPOWERED them not oppressed them.

  • ricefieldradio

    Discussion 5 : 27/11/2009 at 12:38 AM5

    Siam - I can't say I disagree with much you have said. I do however feel that Thailand does not necessarily need Thaksin back, as such.

    Thaksin is more a rallying cry, like following a flag. A lot of people support his ideas on the poor without actually supporting his comeback.

    My personal feeling is that Thaksin (The ideas) changed the landscape of Thai politics and woke the sleeping tiger in the poor. Until Thaksin's programs, and yes some had problems in implementation, the rural and poor felt as though they were in a patronage system just as in the past. Thaksin's administration worked hard to free these people from that feeling and give them a feeling that they were needed and were an important part of Thai society.

    You can argue that Thaksin did it for himself but you cannot argue that the rural poor now feel empowered to make decisions. It's not Thaksin they follow, it's Thaksin's legacy to them and that is hard for many people to understand, especially those who have never spent any time with the poor.

  • nout

    Discussion 4 : 26/11/2009 at 04:58 PM4

    #3, you forgot 1 thing...
    If Thaksin was still in power, he and his 110 cronies would own ALL of Thailand by now.

  • Siam

    Discussion 3 : 26/11/2009 at 01:07 PM3

    Thailand needs correction but not more corruption.

    The only way for that to happen is to battle this out because the Democrat´s and the Thai elite are much worse then Thaskin is. This has been proven.

    Everyone who voices his opinion brings "risk to national security, is an enemy of the motherland (enemy of the state).

    The present government tries to control the situation, the majority of Thais and the international opinion, by instigating "computer crimes" and leese Majesty" etc. They put Security laws into being that prohibit normal life and gatherings and freedom of speech.

    The Democratic government under Abshit have been proven to be everything but Democratic in reality and can´t fool anyone.

    Thailand is a ticking time bomb and the analyst is 100% right in his estimate about the future of Thailand. Never the same again.

    This does not have to be a bad thing because things in Thailand have been seriously wrong for a long long time for the majority of Thai´s.

    If it takes revolution and bloodshed to get true changes through then that is the cost Thailand has to pay for a better society in the aftermath.

    Many wrong things are said about Thaskin time in power.

    Here are some of the FACTS about Thaskin time in power compared to the situation now:

    1) According to international monitoring agencies, the last election which gave Thaksin and his party an overwhelming majority, was rated as one of the “cleanest” elections in Thai history.

    2) The latest report from Transparency International, which rates every country in the world in regards to corruption, has now ranked Thailand LOWER than it was during the Thaksin years. So the “justification” that the coupe was necessary to get rid of “corruption” is a joke, as corruption is now more rampant than it was then.

    3) Under Thaksin, Thailand paid off the entire interest of their IMF loans, and would have – if things had continued - paid off the entire loan within 5 years. NO leader of ANY country has EVER been able to accomplish that financial feat.

    4) As mentioned in DISCUSSION 16, prior to the coupe Thailand had 5 billion Baht surplus, in less than a year the military backed government managed to wipe that out and bring in a 200 billion baht deficit, and it's growing larger by the day.

    5) After the coupe the good General stated that the coupe was necessary: “….because we couldn’t find any way to remove him (Thaksin) democratically.” Yeah, that’s a real good reason.


    6) During a speech at a U.S. University, Sondhi, the leader of PAD, told the audience that the coupe was necessary “….because the Old Power Elite of Bangkok were losing their power and they wanted it back.” To which Sondhi fully supported.

    The coupe wasn’t to get rid of corruption. It was to get rid of a man who had stepped on the toes of too many rich & elite in Bangkok who hated his populace policies, and for recognizing the poor people of Thailand. He was upsetting the apple cart of the Elite who care only for themselves, and who regard everyone else as 2nd class citizens, and they couldn’t stand that.

    Analysts say the coupe set Thailand back about 12 years. I think that’s a very conservative figure, and that the real one is more like 20 years. And if the divisions in Thai society that the coupe has created continue to worsen, that figure could become even higher.


    According to this and all other facts then Thailand needs Thaskin back ASAP.

  • Peter

    Discussion 2 : 26/11/2009 at 12:50 PM2

    Some very revealing statistics reported here, which reveal the harsh economic reality of the unfair distribution of wealth in Thailand.

    The statistics support my personal hobby horse that forbidding foreign ownership of land in Thailand is a deceptive, nasty law intended to protect the interests of the wealthy minority - 10% of land owners own more than 100 rai each, while the remaining 90% own 1 rai or less, and not about protecting the interests of the majority of Thais.

    While the above statistic looks extremely dubious, it suggests no-one owns between 1 and 100 rai, it supports the general argument that the relaxation or even better the abolition of the foreign land ownership law would create a more open economic space and free up a major restriction on the development of Thai enterprise and entrepreneurship, from which the benefits to the balance in society would be enormous.

  • Aussie John

    Discussion 1 : 26/11/2009 at 10:15 AM1

    Great aricle.
    The 'willingness' to accept what actually goes on the kingdom is quite disturbing.
    It's obvious that both fighting parties are not at battle for the nation and parity among its people, but for those wealthy families behind the scenes who trully control the majority of wealth as the article states.
    The majority of my Thai friends are fixated on the aquisition of wealth at all costs for they have been conditioned to know it buys face and connections needed to further their livelihoods with the ideas of actual ,ethics, morals and fair play seen as a hinderance in aquiring such wealth.
    Not paying taxes is very high on their list of avoidence as they see those above them avoiding it at all costs.
    How do you begin to educate the masses when they accept the deception perpetrated right before their eyes and participate in it willingly.
    The majority are not empowered as they lack the education and most impotantly the guidence of transparent and honest governance.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top