On Aug. 6, a call to disarm | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

On Aug. 6, a call to disarm

Tomorrow marks the 67th anniversary of an event that has changed the world perhaps more than any other, when on Aug 6, 1945 a United States army plane dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The bomb killed an estimated 80,000 people immediately and the horrible effects of the radiation from the explosion are still with us today. The event is past the memory of the great majority of people alive, but to a large extent the incredible destruction unleashed that day has shaped modern history and continues to do so. While some believe that the use of the bomb was necessary to end World War Two in the Pacific, everyone knows that such weapons must never be used again.

Yet today there are thousands of thermonuclear bombs which are much more powerful than the ones dropped on Hiroshima and shortly later on Nagasaki, fitted onto guided missiles in fortified shelters around the world, most of them under the control of the US and Russia.

A key component of the 1968 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), aside from the unsuccessful aim of keeping the possession of nuclear weapons from spreading beyond the original five nuclear-armed states, was that these states must take progressive steps to disarm until the day comes when there are no more nuclear weapons in the world. But although the US and Russia have each decommissioned thousands of nuclear warheads, this part of the NPT is a distant and some say an impossible dream.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 3 : 05 Aug 2012 at 19.073

    If the Imperial Japan did not invade China and Manchuria, there won't be a Japanese (surprised) attack on Pearl Harbor, and the US won't drop nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A man reaps what he sows, and if he sows atrocity against his fellow human beings, he will get nuked PERIOD.

    "The ultimate objective in war is not necessarily to kill all the enemies, but rather to destroy their will to fight." (Sun Tzu, the Art of War)

    And that was exactly the US' goal behind its decision to use atomic bombs against Japan, to crush its will to fight, as Japan was prepared to fight until the last man, woman, and child. Therefore, the two atomic bombs dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended up saving tens of million of live on the parts of both the Japanese and the Americans alike.

  • Discussion 2 : 05 Aug 2012 at 13.462

    my son likes the cartoon pic showed mr. dubai

  • Discussion 1 : 05 Aug 2012 at 10.471

    It is strange how little anyone knew of the effects of the bomb at the time. GIs and reporters walked through the bombed cities with no idea that there could be any danger to them. I remember one of my teachers years later bringing an alarm clock and pieces of melted glass to class and letting us handle them. He had been a young sailor in World War II and had picked them up in Hiroshima a week or so after Japan's surrender. He said they were still radioactive. Can you imagine anyone bringing radioactive material into a classroom today!

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.