Why China's nationalism is a threat | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

Why China's nationalism is a threat

The mid-August protests in Chinese cities and accompanying media and internet commentary against Japan over disputed islands in the East China Sea put pressure on Chinese officials to be firm in countering Japanese "intrusions".

They followed calls by prominent Chinese commentators and other constituencies for Beijing to adopt a tougher approach on territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Beijing in that case employed extraordinary measures including repeated use of security forces, economic sanctions, fishing and oil ventures, administrative fiats, diplomatic warnings and other intimidating means short of military force in thus far successful efforts to cow Southeast Asian claimants and preclude Asean from taking a united stand.

Foreign commentators are correct that a good deal of the impetus for popular and elite pressure for a tougher Chinese approach on territorial issues rests with the type of nationalism that has been fostered with increased vigour by the Chinese authorities since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of communism. The nationalistic discourse emphasises that since the 19th century, China has been treated unjustly and its territory and related sovereign rights have been exploited by other powers; China remains in a protracted process of building power sufficient to protect what China controls and regain disputed territory and rights. On the whole, the nationalistic discourse leads to a sense of "victimisation" by Chinese people and elites, who are seen having greater influence on China's foreign affairs decision-making now that the strongman politics of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping have given way to a collective leadership that is more sensitive to popular views.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 2 : 18 Sep 2012 at 12.092

    China dwells on its being exploited by European powers in the 19th century and Japan in the 20th. But China conveniently ignores the years before that, when China was exploiting its own neighbours. Tibet has been independent as often as not, yet China insists it is part of China's integral territory. The same with Xinjiang, with its Muslim non-chinese population. Chinese colonialism apparently it good, western colonialism was not.

  • som

    Discussion 1 : 18 Sep 2012 at 07.091

    The deeper conspiracy that Japan made troubles on
    the Diaoyu Islands issue is to disrupt the strategic plan
    of China to rise peacefully.
    Japan finds it harder to adapt to the rise of China than
    the United States. In 2010, Japan's status as the
    world's second largest economy was replaced by
    China, which made Japan jealous, annoyed and
    depressed.
    from iPhone application.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.