Journalists must re-examine their own prejudices | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

Journalists must re-examine their own prejudices

When we, the mass media, are at work, we must constantly find ways to prevent editorial interference from the state and the industry. But there is one far more dangerous interference which the mass media do not like to talk about. This meddling does not come from the government or the industry. This most dangerous interference in the media profession is our own prejudices, particularly political prejudice.

Yellow- and red-shirt supporters throw objects at each other and trade blows in a clash outside the Crime Suppression Division office on Phahon Yothin Road. By taking sides, the mass media is blamed for aggravating political divisiveness and losing professionalism. SURAPOL PROMSAKA NA SAKOLNAKORN

We know when the government tries to interfere with our work because the moves are clear to us all. The same with the industry. But political prejudice is within our hearts. We can put up walls to protect ourselves from outsiders. We tell each other we can protect ourselves from interference from the government and money power. But when we work, many of us are defeated by our own prejudice. Ideals in the journalistic profession no longer matter. What matters is what side you are on, what side you have chosen to sympathise with.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 5 : 18 Mar 2013 at 22.375

    I think this particular journalist has a rather lofty view of their profession. The reason husbands, wives etc argue their points of view is because they're able to take the information that is given by the media (both sides are portrayed in one paper/channel or another) and make up their own minds which side they prefer. Journalists, whether it's liked or not will be invariably biased but it's up to the public themselves to chose whether they approve of that particular point of view or not. Not all of the public are brainless sheep.

  • Discussion 4 : 18 Mar 2013 at 18.354

    Very well said. The press themselves are part of the problem, a protagonist to a greater and lesser degree. And now you have the amateur press, on Facebook, blogs etc.

  • Discussion 3 : 18 Mar 2013 at 17.303

    D2 : The short answer is the House of Rothschild.

  • Discussion 2 : 18 Mar 2013 at 13.372

    At the fall of the Soviet empire one general visiting America asked how it was possible to get all the TV and newspapers on the governments side as was the case in the USA. Despite arrests, torture, long jail terms and remote gulags they failed in the USSR. Good question.

  • Discussion 1 : 18 Mar 2013 at 06.431

    Outstanding essay. Realize however, that journalistic bias is a worldwide phenomenon. The bias is so blatant in America and other more advanced countries that it is shameless. Reading almost anything, or seeing it, leads one to doubt the veracity of reporting. When people cannot have faith in journalists, one of the last bastions of integrity has disappeared.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.