President Barack Obama is now in Myanmar for a three-day visit to attend the Asean and East Asia summit.
Though the priority of Mr Obama's trip is to attend the regional summit, other pressing issues of bilateral ties between the United States and Myanmar are expected to be discussed.
Mr Obama's visit is particularly significant for two reasons. First, the meeting will bring together world leaders, including presidents of the United States, Russia and China, which are permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Second, on Nov 5, the Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi said that her country's democratic reform process is stalling and that the American government is being over optimistic.
As part of preparation for bilateral meetings, Mr Obama on Oct 30 had separate telephone conversations with President Thein Sein and Ms Suu Kyi. Mr Obama expressed the United States' firm commitment to helping the people of Myanmar achieve a more free, open and prosperous nation.
He also stressed the need to address communal tensions, forge a nationwide cease-fire pact, and hold a credible general election, which is tentatively scheduled for late October or early November next year.
In response to Mr Obama's phone call, leaders of Myanmar's political parties and the army held an unprecedented meeting the same day. The meeting was, among others, attended by President Thein Sein, opposition leader Mrs Suu Kyi, and commander-in-chief of the armed forces Senior General Min Aung Hlaing.
The leaders reportedly discussed their commitment to political reforms, peace talks with ethnic armed groups, and the possibility of amending the 2008 constitution through a legislative process, which the parliament is expected to discuss. However, during a press briefing on Nov 5, Mrs Suu Kyi said the meeting achieved little.
On the eve of Mr Obama's trip to Myanmar, US national security adviser Susan Rice said: "We will underscore the United States' commitment to the protection of human rights, tolerance and pluralism, as well as sustaining and deepening the democratic transition".
Given the significance of the 2015 general election for Myanmar's future political landscape, issues surrounding the amendment of the 2008 constitution will be central to the bilateral talks.
Article 436 requires that the constitution shall be amended by a vote of more than 75% of all representatives of the Union parliament. Therefore, unelected soldiers, who make up a quarter of the legislature, have the last say on changes to the charter.
The 31-member constitution amendment committee, which like parliament was dominated by the military and members of the army-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party, had decided not to recommend a change to the controversial provision that bars Mrs Suu Kyi from becoming president.
Despite the democratic transition, the military still dominates key decision-making — whether in negotiating peace with ethnic armed groups or changing the constitution.
Article 59(f) states that "the president shall himself, one of the parents, the spouses, one of the legitimate children or their spouses not owe allegiance to a foreign power, not be subject of a foreign power or citizen of a foreign country. They shall not be persons entitled to enjoy the rights and privileges of a subject of a foreign government and citizen of a foreign country."
The role of United States government is limited in terms of constitutional amendment but it will be a boost for the National League for Democracy (NLD) and other smaller parties if Mr Obama puts pressure on the Myanmar government.
While efforts for constitutional amendment should be continued, the NLD should also explore the possibility of making Mrs Suu Kyi assume a leadership role similar to Sonia Gandhi of the Indian National Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition government.
Though the condition of Mrs Suu Kyi and Ms Gandhi is different, particularly their country of origin, the critics' arguments about their foreign connections is similar, but not identical. Ms Gandhi is Italian by birth who married an Indian, whereas Mrs Suu Kyi is Burmese by birth and married a British husband, Michael Aris.
In the case of Ms Gandhi, she refused to become the Prime Minister of India but exercised enormous power as president of the Indian National Congress and as chairperson of the UPA. Under similar circumstances, what about Mrs Suu Kyi assuming a similar role?
I am fully aware that predicting such a scenario or proposing such political arrangement will yield mixed reactions — both from supporting and opposing groups. Nevertheless, there needs to be a point where political rivals strike a balance and reach compromise for the sake of the entire country.
Nehginpao Kipgen is a political scientist and general secretary of the US-based Kuki International Forum. He is the author of a book entitled 'Democracy Movement in Myanmar: Problems and Challenges'.