Setting the record straight about a horrific tragedy

GMT +07:00

Send suggestions

Opinion » Opinion

Setting the record straight about a horrific tragedy

  • Published: 7/01/2009 at 12:00 AM
  • Newspaper section: News

I am the guy in the photographs and films in the white shirt covered in blood dragging people out of the window by the main door and the smoking lounge.

 

The fire at the Santika pub on Ekamai road shortly after the New Year left 59 dead and at least 243 injured. The blaze broke out in the early hours of Jan 1 while some 1,000 revellers were celebrating New Year’s Eve and bidding farewell to the pub, which was to be closed after the ‘‘Goodbye Santika’’ party.

I would actually like to take exception to the comments made by some of the press and armchair critics in all forums and to defend some of the people accused of what was a tragic accident.

I think you are all forgetting that this was an accident and it was actually the stampede and the panic that caused the problem for the majority, resulting in the deaths that occurred.

The owner was with us for the whole time, helping us get people out of the club and to say he has crocodile tears or something similar is a gross misrepresentation of a very concerned man and someone I know very well who put his life on the line along with the rest of the helpers (less than 15 people, by the way, out of the 800 or so people who remained outside and felt it better to get their phone cameras out than to help the dying people at the club).

There are also claims that the fire crews could not get to the club for up to 45 minutes. The girls in the toilets, who included one of my best friends, were rescued within 25 minutes as she remained on the phone with her boyfriend throughout the whole ordeal and it took 21 minutes from start to finish of that phone call to when the fire brigade reached them.

In that time the club had burned as much as it was going to, as the emergency services were flooding the place (in a completely disorganised way) and the people in full rescue gear could take over.

The club was my local haunt and the owner is a close personal friend of mine. He is distraught and completely at odds with what has happened. However, I do think the record should be set straight on this, as the people at the club rightly say that the club was engulfed within seconds of the fire starting.

My own theory on this is that the bottles of alcohol on the tables significantly worsened the effect as the heat rose in the club. This is a common feature of Bangkok and all Asian nightclubs, where the alcohol is kept by the customer on their table. Basically, each and every table has a Molotov cocktail on it in a situation of this nature and I witnessed first-hand the bottles exploding as the heat from the fire reached them. I believe this is what caused the majority of the burns and the speed with which the fire spread, regardless of materials used at the club. Within 90 seconds the club was engulfed - now who do you wish to blame for this?

The start was probably by either the pyrotechnic display on the stage or the sparklers and firecrackers which the customers had brought with them. The outside effects, I seriously doubt, could have caused the problem, as being outside by the front of the club no embers came our way from that main display. This use of firecrackers and sparklers is another Thai/Asian tradition. Inside the club it probably set the alcove by the stage on fire, which quickly spread to the upper area of the club which was a mosaic created from gypsum board. However, as the heat descended the bottles started to explode and covered everything in their vicinity in highly flammable liquid.

My friends and I (including the owner), who were outside when the fire started, only noticed the problem inside when the clubbers started to stream through the side and main doors. Again, just to set the record straight, there were three exits and they were all used by the escapees.

The problem was the panic and stampede and the lack of emergency lighting in the club, although I seriously doubt that this would have had any benefit as the club was engulfed in thick, black, acrid smoke that fell immediately onto the floor and caused a lot of the deaths by smoke inhalation.

Downstairs in the toilet area, each toilet was connected to the outside as they are open to the elements; however the boardwalk above covered any means of escape. We did manage to get through that (this is where the owner was ripping his way through to try and reach the toilet area) and rescue the people from the men's and women's toilet areas, again a misreport. My friend Jic was in the ladies' toilet and I sent two firemen down to reach her after they sprayed water on the club entrance area. They chain-led four girls from the toilet and saved them, others were pulled up from the now open boardwalk area at the side of the club.

There was myself, another two foreign guys and about 8-10 Thai guys (mostly staff) who risked going back in; everyone else (a symptom of Thai society) decided that they should take their camera phones out and start filming.

I have to say I am very disappointed in the press and media who were on the scene faster than the emergency services and who got in the way, as you can see from the films. Again, another symptom of the age we live in, when capturing a person's death on your digital device so you can sell it to the press for a few baht, is more important than saving that life.

I do not want recognition for this - all I ask is that the facts are reported correctly. I was frontline and tried to save as many people as possible. There are images I will never forget from going back into the club. This is, and always has been, my favourite place in Bangkok and it was a tragedy which probably could have been lessened but not prevented due to the reasons I have stated.

As for the problems regarding the licensing, etc, let's all be realistic and show we know how this works in Thailand. We all know enforcement or the lack thereof is a paid-for service within this community and that the "tea money" covers a lot of misdemeanours and also protection.

The authorities act as a semi-legal mafia and these sort of protection rackets are an everyday occurrence here; that is not to say that a lot of policemen and emergency services don't risk their own lives. But the facts should come out.

I really would like to set the record straight on this, as the emergency services - while completely disorganised due to the lack of a consensus in Bangkok and Thailand as a whole (this is a point for a much longer conversation on how to ensure organisation is maintained, which is sorely lacking, I am afraid) - were onsite fairly quickly given the traffic conditions on Ekamai road, which is notoriously busy at night. And they included some of the bravest people I have ever seen.

About the author

Writer: Julian Bulman

Share your thoughts

For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum

Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.

  • yassin

    Discussion 48 : 12/08/2009 at 11:56 PM48

    hey

  • joe

    Discussion 47 : 20/04/2009 at 02:25 PM47

    I find it too coincidental that this fire occured on the last day that Santika was to be operational. It was supposedly to be closed down the very next day, just a couple of hours away from its closing, a tragedy of this magnitude occurs. The owners, almost successfully got away with, virtually no fire prevention or protection methods at all. I dont know, maybe im just a bit too skeptical, but i smell something fishy here.. it was mentioned earlier in one of the comments.. maybe it was a prank gone wrong or maybe even some sort of insurance fraud...insurance not paid?? But everyone is right though, it was a tragedy waiting to happen...

  • Rene

    Discussion 46 : 11/01/2009 at 12:01 PM46

    Guys,

    I have been to Santika a number of times my self since I lived in that area. After the club was renovated in 2006 or so, it was not the same any more. It was way past it peak. The renovation had added some proof elements to the ceiling, some kind of a sponge or Styrofoam thing. I always wondered whether it would be of fire retardant material and if you ever experienced Bangkok, the answer is simple. Of course not, anybody will have ever heard about something like that. If that starts to burn the burning parts will detach from the ceiling and drop down on the crown igniting the whole place – a disaster scenario.
    In addition, when now some officials say that they are ‘surprised to learn that there is only one exit’ then this is the right wording. They know that most likely the building will only require one exit because some messed with the building licence and therefore used some loophole to avoid having more exits – if they were at all required in the first place. Just look at a few other clubs in that area and it is all the same. We were lucky that Santika was not a hot spot (at least amongst the Thais). A fire in one of the hot spot clubs would have harmed many more people and the very sad death toll had been a multiple. The officials know that and none of the other clubs will be hardmed. The party goes on. Mai pen rai krab.

    Now I read some guys talking about fire exits and sprinkler system. Not sure whether you are idealists or ignorants. I give you the benefit of the doubt so there’re idealists. Guys wake up. You are not in the UK, Germany or Australia (ignore the US, most of you guys never understand anybody else anyway). All high standards you know do not apply here. It’s more like Spain or Greece and a bit worse. However, the guys who mention the high fstandards have the advantage to understand that they are exposed when visiting clubs in Bangkok. Other who have never heard about that will wrongly think that fire prevention standards are OK.

    Are Bangkok’s clubs safe? No, of course they are not. (The hot spot clubs are even worse but most likely you will not know them anyway, so lucky you.) You are not in an environment with western standards and that is one of the reasons why drinks are cheap and the party is on every day. We all know that, enjoy it and every now and then when faced with making the call if we want to take the risk, then deliberately decide to go for the booze i.e. push aside the risk consideration. Bangkok is and will remain fun. You know what deal you buy in so if a tragedy like that happens my thoughts are all with the friends and families. It is very sad. At the same time, I know that we all move on and the party never stops.

    Wake up guys !

  • Hyperinflation

    Discussion 45 : 08/01/2009 at 04:21 AM45

    We are asked to believe in this story that the owner and shareholders were forced to participate in corruption. That may in fact be true, however NOTHING prevented the owners from installing proper sprinkler systems and emergency lighting. The fact that there was no fire safety equipment was pure greed on the part of the club owners.

    Next, we are told that exit signs would not have helped because of acrid smoke, as if this justifies not having them. This is as ridiculous as telling a scuba diver you didn't fill his tank because he might run out of air anyway. Is this supposed to be a justification?

    I'm sorry. Yes, Thailand is a corrupt country, and the police require you to jump through some pretty crazy hoops on the licensing issue. However, the decision whether or not to put profits or the safety of your patrons as your priority is entirely within your domain. You don't need the police to install a sprinkler system or proper exit lighting. You don't need the police to make sure you don't allow more people inside a building that it was designed to handle. You don't need the police to tell the band no pyrotechnics will be allowed because it violates common sense.

    Oh, and trying to blame this on exploding beer and whiskey bottles is quite novel. Unfortunately, 80 proof whiskey can barely even burn. Didn't you ever try and blow a fireball when you were at university? Have any idea why you needed Bacardi 151 or better to make it work? And that's when it is already vaporized. The explosions you witnessed were nothing more than pressure building up inside bottles that were sealed. Pure ater would have burst the bottles. I highly doubt you would try and claim water was the accelerant responsible for the blaze.

    Please, be humble. Be contrite. Do not try and justify your hideous acts. You definitely should go to jail for what you have done. The fact that you're sorry now does not excuse your reprehensible behavior. To the editors of the Bangkok Post, I suggest you read some of these comments, and publish a follow up story to the Santika shareholders listing some of these issues.

  • Alan Oz

    Discussion 44 : 07/01/2009 at 10:08 PM44

    I wonder how much did he receive from the owner !!
    He tries to make an ugly man a hero.

  • dumb icon

    Discussion 43 : 07/01/2009 at 08:05 PM43

    The Bangkok Post Sucks! I knew it when they lead with the head line "Club Opened Illegally". That's like a paragraph 10 sidenote as we all know that is commonplace in this country. Way to miss the point Bangkok post.

  • wc

    Discussion 42 : 07/01/2009 at 07:28 PM42

    How could you let this thing published????
    Guess the owner of Santika is a good friend of the head of Bangkok Post too.
    Shame on you Bangkok Post!

  • Kaweeka

    Discussion 41 : 07/01/2009 at 05:34 PM41

    It really is hard for me to understand how the Bangkok Post can contemplate publishing this rubbish without at least offering some sort of editorial analysis of the many statements made by this guy.

    When he posted this as a rebutal to many comments made on another story on this fire I rebutted his arguments on various fronts. He replied stating that he was not trying to deflect blame away from the owners and that he was just trying to illustrate how this problem was part of an edemic problem in Thai Society. Point taken and I agreed with it, but it did not address nor does it deflect the issues at hand such as those addressed by many of the commentators here.

    It is just unimaginable to me how a newspaper, with supposedly intelligent people working there, can think that a statement about exploding bottles of alcohol, thick smoke and a stampeded of people being the primary cause of so many dead can go unchallenged.

    It really doesn't take that much critical or analytical thinking to realize that his account of the 'facts' is incredibly erroneous. Alcohol bottles do not explode like that so quickly, and if they do this effect is only the symptom of a much bigger problem - such as extremely flammable products within the premises.

    I am not about to lambast this guy too much, he can believe all he wants about how sorry the owner feels, but that is the case for just about any other human being out there. The point is that the owner DID NOT care about these issues BEFORE the tragedy, and that is the issue at hand.

    Sure enough, the root of this problem lies outside of this unscrupulous owner alone, and can be traced to the massive corruption within the government and the police force. Thai society has created this environment in which the rich and priviledged know they can get away with anything, and if it is not legal, well, it can be made legal, one way or the other. That is the edemic problem that needs to be resolved, yet that does not ABSOLVE the owner in any shape or form. He is just another piece of the problem, and in this case, he IS a major player in this particular tragedy.

    But I go back to what really has me disgusted - that the so called media in this country seems to be absolutely and uterly clueless about how to get to the bottom of problems. They have yet to write anything truly critical of the system that has allowed this to happen in the first place. They are a bunch of spineless cowards that truly should just go and write children's books or something that is more in light with their ability to do any sort of investigative journalism. Shame on them, of the grandest scale.

  • Ben

    Discussion 40 : 07/01/2009 at 05:13 PM40

    Sorry but I disagree with most comentators here. It's easy to blame this pub owners as the accident arrived here. Should law be enforced, it should be evenly.

    Following strict(probably even just "basic") safety rules, almost all entertainment venues of Bangkok should be closed.

    Anyone disagree on that?

    So instead of blaming these guys, the blame should be on society that allowed this. Every problem that caused this event is common practice in Bangkok.

    If we put the blame on the owners, they will pay/go to jail, and the problem will be quietly forgotten in 6 month.

    Don't blame, push for a change in the rules, at least it will save lives in the future. It's a good moment to do so, with this tragedy still fresh in all minds.

    And no stupid "easy fix" rule like "Oh, we should forbid fireworks in night clubs then"... I'm talking about a complete overhaul.

  • obs

    Discussion 39 : 07/01/2009 at 03:54 PM39

    While I agree with some of your points such as corrupted law enforcement allowing illegal pubs to be open, stating several times that you are so close to the owner, makes your article seem biased and lacking credibility.

    There were indeed more than one exit there, actually, it had 4 exits there. The main entrance, the 2 smokers lounge exits on left and right of the main entrance and a back door exit where the staff (and band/VIP guests) would enter/exit.

    However, it still does not justify the tragic that ensued. The place was a death trap from day one (as is most of the pubs in Thailand). With too many customers allowed to enter (again, as is the case of most pubs in Thailand) and the lack of fire prevention equipment and trained staff.

    I would suggest you to tell your friend to cough up the money to pay to the victims rather than paying off the police to put this under wrap. The place on a good Friday/Saturday night would make about 4-500,000THB. The profit margin on mixers at these pubs runs about 90%. They buy the Soda at 5 THB and sell them for 70-80 THB. Whisky is sold at 1,500THB with a cost of 800 THB. So, adding revenue and deducting cost of staff/utilities/rent etc., should bring profit of about 2-3 Million THB per month. This is about 20-30 Million THB per year. So rather than doing a charity raiser (I know the share holders are running around town with white envelopes to ask friends for charity to help the victims), your friend should really pay his own money, if not, karma will eventually catch him.

Reply

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  • As a courtesy to our readers, please use proper punctuation and correct spelling.

back to top