Bangkok Post » Poll
- Most recent
- Most viewed
- 03:22 PMSecond chance for rare turtles
- 01:01 PMPoll: Pongsak blamed for blackout
- 10:49 AMUS push on Myanmar in new phase
- 10:40 AMPM hopes for Japan investment
- 10:18 AMGold prices up 50 baht
- 09:50 AMBombs black out Yala district
- 04:49 AMIMF chief ducks scandal charges
Share your thoughts
For more candid, lengthy, conversational and open discussion between one another, use our Forum
Report objectionable comments click here. Include: discussion #, commenter name, comment date / time as it looks on the page. Example: discussion 15: 09/01/2009 at 10:00 AM.
Discussion 12 : 25 Oct 2012 at 19.4312
President Obama will win the election because United States oil-production under the Obama watch has been such a success, that the United States, will soon overtake the oil production of Saudi Arabia and become the world's leading oil producer. Drilling in the western states is producing over 200 new American millionaires every month. There's also been a big reduction in U.S. treasury certificates China, holds against the U.S. debt. The U.S. economic recovery is underway. There's no-way President Obama can lose this election.
Discussion 11 : 25 Oct 2012 at 18.0711
Its a close call that could be decided by a slip up and attack ad. Whoever wins they will not be able to heal the growing divide. Obama has failed and Romney would need more than an economic miracle to get the socialists on board. Before someone points it out.......this problem is not just peculiar to the US.
Discussion 10 : 25 Oct 2012 at 08.3210
Spicemen D9: The world was turning round and round before the US got discovered.
Discussion 9 : 25 Oct 2012 at 08.169
Where is possible answer: They are both bad choices
Discussion 8 : 25 Oct 2012 at 07.518
I don't know what is better for the US, but for the rest of the world, I hope it will be Obama. To me, he appears to be less agressive on the global platform.
Discussion 7 : 25 Oct 2012 at 07.267
Khun Mathew #6, and Obama is not rich? Did you know that he is a millionaire too? The difference is he used his governmental position to make his millions, while Romney earned it the old fashion way, fair and square in the private sector, creating plenty of jobs, and donating plenty of money to charity in the process. Romney was a former Governor of Massachusetts too, who declined his governor's salary of $135,000 a year, during his governorship. Don't you wish we had leader like him leading Thailand?
Discussion 6 : 25 Oct 2012 at 06.366
Yes Most of the people voting in here doesn't have any clues or maybe they are just voting for the rich.
Discussion 5 : 25 Oct 2012 at 03.025
As of today (10/24/12)
Rasmussen Poll: Romney 50% vs Obama 46%
Gallop Poll: Romney 51% vs Obama 46%
Rasmussen Poll in Ohio: Romney 48% vs Obama 48%
Iowa: Romney 48% vs Obama 48%
Florida: Romney 51% vs Obama 46%
Virginia: Romney 50% vs Obama 47%
Colorado: Romney 50% vs Obama 46%Discussion 4 : 25 Oct 2012 at 00.414
No one knows untill 6/7 November 2012. The polls in the US have become biased and can't be trusted. Instead of polls reflecting the views of voters it's become instruments to sway the votes of Americans.
Discussion 3 : 24 Oct 2012 at 20.233
Obama has done nothing to earn a second term. Dragged the country towards socialism and ruined the future for the next several generations. Romney may not be better but he certainly can't be worse.
