Deadline looms in Panama canal expansion row

Deadline looms in Panama canal expansion row

No end was in sight Sunday to a financial row over cost overruns on Panama's canal expansion that could threaten the megaproject key to world trade.

A bird is seen at the Panama Canal's Gatun locks in Colon 110 km northwest of Panama City, on January 17, 2014

The Grupo Unidos por el Canal consortium, led by Spanish builder Sacyr, has threatened to suspend the expansion work by January 20 unless Panama pays for $1.6 billion in "unforeseen" costs.

GUPC, which includes Impreglio of Italy, Belgium's Jan de Nul and Constructora Urbana of Panama, has agreed to negotiate with the canal authority within the contract.

The overall canal upgrade is costing $5.2 billion, including GUPC's $3.2 billion contract to build a third set of locks for the century-old canal, which currently welcomes ships that carry up to 5,000 containers.

Already facing delays, the project aims to make the 80-kilometer (50-mile) waterway, which handles five percent of global maritime trade, big enough to handle new cargo ships that can carry 12,000 containers.

In the current dispute, GUPC says it ran into costly overruns because the canal authority gave the builders the wrong information regarding the area's geology.

With Monday's deadline looming, canal administrator Jorge Quijano said that contact with the consortium continued over the weekend but that so far no deal had been struck.

"We do help GUPC will find a way that will enable them to move forward on the construction, and continue to make its demands and requests as (the consortium) should under the contract," Quijano told AFP.

He stressed that construction would go ahead with or without GUPC.

The consortium denied that it was in any danger of ceasing construction Monday.

There is "no reason to make any change tomorrow in the status of the construction," the group's statement said, arguing that GUPC could cease work at any time as it deems necessary, and not necessarily on Monday.

Do you like the content of this article?
COMMENT