|
Picking
the winners
Property, building and commerce sectors ride consumption-led
recovery to deliver best returns to shareholders over 12 months,
but many other good-value stocks exist for investors who know
how to judge them
CHIRATAS NIVATPUMIN
Stock investors have enjoyed a pleasant surprise for the year
to date, with the Stock Exchange of Thailand index up 20%
since January.
This despite investor jitters over corporate
accounting in the United States, relatively disappointing
export performance and growing questions about the country's
medium-term competitiveness. Gains have helped spur a revival
in interest in the capital markets.
Credit the rises to a growing consumer-led
recovery, plentiful market liquidity and a concerted effort
by regulators and policymakers to promote the exchange as
a funding source for companies and a stable long-term savings
vehicle for individuals. With listed companies posting nearly
a 30% increase in profitability in the first half from the
year before, it comes as little surprise to see share prices
rising for almost all sectors on the exchange.
But a closer look at the numbers shows a more
diverse picture, suggesting that investors _ and corporate
executives _ would do well to consider the factors affecting
share prices.
Shareholder returns ultimately hinge on two
factors, dividends and capital gains. Corporate profits and
a firm's financial structure provide the main drivers for
dividends, while market expectations about a company's future
position steer long-term share prices.
The Shareholder Scorecard prepared by L.E.K.
Consulting and the Bangkok Post aims to help investors pick
winners by ranking listed firms by their total shareholder
returns, using market prices and dividend performance as of
the end of June 2002, ranging from a one-year to a 10-year
basis.
Leading the one-year sector performance figures,
property stands dominant, with a total shareholder return
of 163.9% compared with a gain of 21.3% for the overall market.
Other top winners, such building and furnishing
materials and household goods, reinforce the message that
the economy has turned the corner, driven by Thai consumers,
according to J. Sharad Apte, a director of L.E.K.'s Bangkok
office.
``We see two sides of the spectrum. On one
hand, you have banks, still in a recovery mode from the crisis,
and telecommunications, which has been struck by the global
downturn,'' Mr Apte said.
``And on the other hand, there's property,
commerce and construction, all sectors which have benefited
from the domestic recovery.''
Hardest hit among all sectors was communications.
While the market leader in 10-year sector returns, telecoms
was down an average of 24.2% at the end of June on a one-year
basis. Even the best sector performer, cellular operator and
perennial blue-chip Advanced Info Service, posted a 10% decline
in total shareholder value for the year.
While some blame can go to the general aversion
investors worldwide have had to telecoms following the collapse
of the dot.com bubble, some of the problems industry giants
are facing in North America or Europe are the same as those
confronting local players.
``The transformation of the competitive landscape
has been a big factor,'' Mr Apte said.
Indeed, 2002 has been a tumultuous year for
the telecoms sector, led by the entry of TA Orange in the
cellular market. Competition for users has led operators to
unlock handset codes, causing an erosion in margins and revenue.
Market liberalisation and the privatisation of the state-owned
Telephone Organisation of Thailand and the Communications
Authority of Thailand has introduced additional uncertainties
about the future position of local operators.
``The competitive position of some of these
players has eroded a bit. But has the sell-off been irrational,''
Mr Apte said.
``Perhaps. But just as the Internet boom saw
irrational gains in share prices for dot.coms, here, we're
seeing the response on the opposite side.''
Bob Neapole, another director in L.E.K.'s
Bangkok office, notes that several local players were suffering
from the same issues as larger telecom firms overseas.
``Take France Telecom, which is struggling
under a high debt and interest burden. Well, TelecomAsia has
the same problems,'' Mr Neapole said.
Indeed, AIS, which accounts for over half
of the total market capitalisation for the telecom sector,
has seen a steady erosion in its total shareholder returns
over the past few years. While on a 10-year basis, returns
stand at 23%, this falls to 12% for five-years and just 4%
over three-years.
``There's been a steady levelling off in share
price performance. How much is this from the investment community
realising that the firm's dominant position is being continuously
eroded,'' Mr Neapole asked rhetorically.
Mr Apte agreed. ``When margins decline, it
is reflected in the forward share price. This is a case of
investors looking down the road to the future.''
Banking, accounting for over 27% of total
market capitalisation, showed a more mixed picture. The one-year
sector return stood at just 4.7%, although this was heavily
affected by sector giant Krung Thai Bank's -7% return, dragging
down the group.
Mr Neapole noted that the top-tier banks _
Bangkok Bank, Thai Farmers Bank and Siam Commercial Bank _
all posted total shareholder returns of over 40% on a one-year
basis.
``When you talk to people about the banking
sector, it's these three banks that come to mind. These banks
are the ones thinking of retail strategy, about product development
and cross-selling,'' he said.
``These are the ones which are consistently
being mentioned by investors, as proactive in trying to build
a position for themselves in the future.''
Mr Apte said agriculture was one sector which
had been a steady performer over the past few years, reflecting
one of the core strengths of the Thai economy.
``When you think of Thailand, you think of
agriculture. It doesn't necessarily appear in the top-five
performers, but the sector has delivered consistently for
investors,'' he said.
``It reflects agriculture's role as a fundamental
driver of the economy. In rice, in sugar, Thailand performs
very well, on a globally competitive scale.''
But executives who see their share price fall
as part of a sector sell-off fail to understand that there
are concrete steps which can be taken to manage investor expectations.
While an economic downturn does affect everyone, a successful
strategy can ensure that the impact is less relative to investors.
``It's very important to be proactive in managing
your share price. That means reaching out to the investor
community,'' Mr Apte said.
``Not retail investors. Retail investors don't
drive your long-term share price. It's the lead or `steer'
analysts, the fund managers, whom you need to reach. You need
to manage the perceptions they have of your strategy, or of
your quarterly results.''
Mr Neapole agreed. ``Some companies, when
bad news hits, tend to close their doors. But you can argue
that that's the time when you need to go out and talk to people.''
He paused. ``Markets tend to discount shares
in the absence of information. Without information, people
tend to turn conservative. Getting your story out on the street
is critical.''
But the roots of many listed firms as family-owned
businesses have made the concept of active investor management
slow to catch on in the local market.
``Many really don't care about capital gains.
They are happy to take their dividends, and so they ask, `Why
spend money on managing the share price?''' Mr Apte said.
Yet putting into place the mechanisms and
systems to track the drivers of shareholder value remains
a critical need for many Thai and Asian firms if they are
to step up in the global arena.
``For many firms, management remain unaware
of what it is that drives their shareholder value,'' Mr Apte
said.
``This isn't just information technology systems.
It's more on what information to collect, what to present.
Only now are some companies beginning to be aware of this.''
Mr Neapole echoed the sentiments. ``Many companies
are not as aware as they could be about what investors want.
It's not just sales and profit figures, or earnings-per-share
figures, but much much more.''
Back to index page
|